Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: A randomized clinical trial

被引:104
|
作者
Benassi, L [1 ]
Rossi, T [1 ]
Kaihura, CT [1 ]
Ricci, L [1 ]
Bedocchi, L [1 ]
Galanti, B [1 ]
Vadora, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Neonatol, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
fibroid tumor; enlarged uteri; vaginal hysterectomy;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.127596
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes in patients who undergo vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for enlarged symptomatic uteri. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective, randomized study, 60 vaginal hysterectomies (study group) were compared with 59 abdominal hysterectomies (control group); all of the hysterectomies were performed for symptomatic uterine fibroids from January 1997 through December 2000. We excluded from the study the other common causes of hysterectomy such as prolapse, bleeding, adenomyosis, and endometrial or cervical carcinoma. In both groups, uterine weights ranged from 200 g to 1300 g. For enlarged uteri, vaginal hysterectomies were performed with the use of volume reduction techniques: intramyometrial coring, corporal bisection, and morcellation. The evaluated parameters included patient age, weight, parity, uterine weight, operative time, blood loss, demand for analgesics, eventual surgical complications, length of admission, and hospital charges. The Mann-Whitney U test and chi(2) tests were applied for statistical analysis. Probability values of <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no major differences in patient age, weight, parity, and uterine weight between-the two groups. Operative time was significantly lower for the vaginal route as compared with the abdominal route (86 minutes vs 102 minutes, P < .001). No intraoperative complications were noted both in the study and control groups or the control group. Surgical bleeding (expressed by hemoglobin loss) was not significantly different between the two groups. In the postoperative period, we found a higher incidence of fever (30.5% vs 16.6%, P < .05) and demand for analgesics (86% vs 66%, P < .05) in the abdominal group as compared with the vaginal group. Significant advantages of vaginal hysterectomy were a reduction in the hospital stay (3 days vs 4 days, P < .001) and cost. CONCLUSION: These results should lead to the choice of vaginal hysterectomy as a valid alternative to the abdominal hysterectomy, even for enlarged uteri.
引用
收藏
页码:1561 / 1565
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy outcomes: a prospective non-randomized trial of two hundred women
    Souayeh, N.
    Hsayaoui, N.
    Jaafar, W.
    Bettaieb, H.
    Khedija, M. A. B.
    Oueslati, H.
    Mbarki, C.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 61 - 61
  • [22] TECHNIQUE OF VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR MYOMA UTERI
    COUNSELLER, VS
    WELCH, JS
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1958, 1 (02): : 475 - 486
  • [23] VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF DESCENSUS UTERI
    DANFORTH, WC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1945, 50 (04) : 376 - 384
  • [24] Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus
    Sesti, Francesco
    Ruggeri, Velia
    Pietropolli, Adalgisa
    Piccione, Emilio
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2008, 12 (03) : 246 - 251
  • [25] A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Ribeiro, SC
    Ribeiro, RM
    Santos, NC
    Pinotti, JA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2003, 83 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [26] Comparison of the Effect of Laparoscopic and Abdominal Hysterectomy on Lower Urinary Tract Function, Vaginal Length, and Dyspareunia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Polat, Mesut
    Kahramanoglu, Ilker
    Senol, Taylan
    Senturk, Baki
    Ozkaya, Enis
    Karateke, Ates
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 26 (02): : 116 - 121
  • [27] Is Vaginal Hysterectomy Safe for an Enlarged Uterus?
    Bahat, Pinar Yalcin
    Gulova, Sibel
    Ozgor, Bahar Yuksel
    Cakmak, Kubra
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [28] Chlorhexidine Versus Iodine for Vaginal Preparation Before Hysterectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Hill, Austin M.
    Pauls, Rachel N.
    Basil, Jack
    Tam, Tiffanie
    Yook, Eunsun
    Shatkin-Margolis, Abigail
    Kleeman, Steven
    Yeung, Jennifer
    Aldrich, Emily
    Crisp, Catrina C.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 28 (02): : 77 - 84
  • [29] Postoperative complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy for uteri weighing ≤250 g
    Mou, T.
    Das, D.
    Brown, O.
    Mueller, M. G.
    Kenton, K.
    Bretschneider, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (06) : S758 - S759
  • [30] Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial
    Allam, Ihab Serag
    Makled, Ahmed Khairy
    Gomaa, Ihab Adel
    El Bishry, Gasser Mohammad
    Bayoumy, Hassan Awwad
    Ali, Doaa Fouad
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (06) : 1341 - 1345