Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: A randomized clinical trial

被引:104
|
作者
Benassi, L [1 ]
Rossi, T [1 ]
Kaihura, CT [1 ]
Ricci, L [1 ]
Bedocchi, L [1 ]
Galanti, B [1 ]
Vadora, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Neonatol, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
fibroid tumor; enlarged uteri; vaginal hysterectomy;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.127596
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes in patients who undergo vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for enlarged symptomatic uteri. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective, randomized study, 60 vaginal hysterectomies (study group) were compared with 59 abdominal hysterectomies (control group); all of the hysterectomies were performed for symptomatic uterine fibroids from January 1997 through December 2000. We excluded from the study the other common causes of hysterectomy such as prolapse, bleeding, adenomyosis, and endometrial or cervical carcinoma. In both groups, uterine weights ranged from 200 g to 1300 g. For enlarged uteri, vaginal hysterectomies were performed with the use of volume reduction techniques: intramyometrial coring, corporal bisection, and morcellation. The evaluated parameters included patient age, weight, parity, uterine weight, operative time, blood loss, demand for analgesics, eventual surgical complications, length of admission, and hospital charges. The Mann-Whitney U test and chi(2) tests were applied for statistical analysis. Probability values of <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no major differences in patient age, weight, parity, and uterine weight between-the two groups. Operative time was significantly lower for the vaginal route as compared with the abdominal route (86 minutes vs 102 minutes, P < .001). No intraoperative complications were noted both in the study and control groups or the control group. Surgical bleeding (expressed by hemoglobin loss) was not significantly different between the two groups. In the postoperative period, we found a higher incidence of fever (30.5% vs 16.6%, P < .05) and demand for analgesics (86% vs 66%, P < .05) in the abdominal group as compared with the vaginal group. Significant advantages of vaginal hysterectomy were a reduction in the hospital stay (3 days vs 4 days, P < .001) and cost. CONCLUSION: These results should lead to the choice of vaginal hysterectomy as a valid alternative to the abdominal hysterectomy, even for enlarged uteri.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1561 / 1565
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vaginal hysterectomy or laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged myomatous uterus:a randomized clinical trial
    范融
    朱兰
    郎景和
    史宏晖
    龚晓明
    生殖医学杂志, 2011, 20 (S2) : 8 - 12
  • [2] Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance:: Randomized study
    Daraï, E
    Soriano, D
    Kimata, P
    Laplace, C
    Lecuru, F
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (05): : 712 - 716
  • [3] Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy
    Falcone, T
    Paraiso, MFR
    Mascha, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (04) : 955 - 962
  • [4] ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS TRANSVAGINAL MORCELLATION FOR THE REMOVAL OF ENLARGED UTERI
    HOFFMAN, MS
    DECESARE, S
    KALTER, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (02) : 309 - 315
  • [5] Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy and Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kongwattanakul, Kiattisak
    Khampitak, Kovit
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 19 (01) : 89 - 94
  • [6] Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri with or without laparoscopic assistance: A retrospective study
    Ferrari, MM
    Grijucla, B
    Gaita, S
    Taricco, E
    Rossi, G
    Minghetti, D
    Giovannini, N
    Pardi, G
    WORLD MEETING ON MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY IN GYNECOLOGY, 2003, : 81 - 86
  • [7] Abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged myomatous uterus compared with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation
    Taylor, SM
    Romero, AA
    Kammerer-Doak, DN
    Qualls, C
    Rogers, RG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) : 1579 - 1582
  • [8] Vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri between 280 and 700 g: a randomized controlled trial
    Walid E. Mohammed
    Fekrya Salama
    Ahmed Tharwat
    Ibrahim Mohamed
    Ahmed ElMaraghy
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2017, 296 : 77 - 83
  • [9] Vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri between 280 and 700 g: a randomized controlled trial
    Mohammed, Walid E.
    Salama, Fekrya
    Tharwat, Ahmed
    Mohamed, Ibrahim
    ElMaraghy, Ahmed
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 296 (01) : 77 - 83
  • [10] Abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged myomatous uterus compared with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation - Discussion
    Gallup, D
    Taylor
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) : 1582 - 1583