NCBO Ontology Recommender 2.0: an enhanced approach for biomedical ontology recommendation

被引:55
|
作者
Martinez-Romero, Marcos [1 ]
Jonquet, Clement [1 ,3 ]
O'Connor, Martin J. [1 ]
Graybeal, John [1 ]
Pazos, Alejandro [2 ]
Musen, Mark A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford Ctr Biomed Informat Res, 1265 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ A Coruna, Dept Informat & Commun Technol, Comp Sci Bldg,Elvina Campus, La Coruna 15071, Spain
[3] Univ Montpellier, LIRMM, 161 rue Ada, F-34095 Montpellier 5, France
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Ontology selection; Ontology recommendation; Ontology evaluation; Semantic Web; Biomedical ontologies; NCBO BioPortal; NATIONAL-CENTER; BIO-ONTOLOGIES; SEARCH; SYSTEM; TOOL;
D O I
10.1186/s13326-017-0128-y
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Ontologies and controlled terminologies have become increasingly important in biomedical research. Researchers use ontologies to annotate their data with ontology terms, enabling better data integration and interoperability across disparate datasets. However, the number, variety and complexity of current biomedical ontologies make it cumbersome for researchers to determine which ones to reuse for their specific needs. To overcome this problem, in 2010 the National Center for Biomedical Ontology (NCBO) released the Ontology Recommender, which is a service that receives a biomedical text corpus or a list of keywords and suggests ontologies appropriate for referencing the indicated terms. Methods: We developed a new version of the NCBO Ontology Recommender. Called Ontology Recommender 2.0, it uses a novel recommendation approach that evaluates the relevance of an ontology to biomedical text data according to four different criteria: (1) the extent to which the ontology covers the input data; (2) the acceptance of the ontology in the biomedical community; (3) the level of detail of the ontology classes that cover the input data; and (4) the specialization of the ontology to the domain of the input data. Results: Our evaluation shows that the enhanced recommender provides higher quality suggestions than the original approach, providing better coverage of the input data, more detailed information about their concepts, increased specialization for the domain of the input data, and greater acceptance and use in the community. In addition, it provides users with more explanatory information, along with suggestions of not only individual ontologies but also groups of ontologies to use together. It also can be customized to fit the needs of different ontology recommendation scenarios. Conclusions: Ontology Recommender 2.0 suggests relevant ontologies for annotating biomedical text data. It combines the strengths of its predecessor with a range of adjustments and new features that improve its reliability and usefulness. Ontology Recommender 2.0 recommends over 500 biomedical ontologies from the NCBO BioPortal platform, where it is openly available (both via the user interface at http://bioportal. bioontology. org/recommender, and via a Web service API).
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Biomedical Ontology on Genetic Disease
    Iqtidar, Aamna
    Muzaffar, Abdul Wahab
    Qamar, Usman
    Rehman, Saad
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS, DATA AND CLOUD COMPUTING (ICC 2017), 2017,
  • [32] OntoBa: Ontology of Biomedical Analysis
    Moussaoui, Nabil
    Dennai, Abdeslem
    Benali, Khaled
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 21 (04)
  • [33] The SWAN biomedical discourse ontology
    Ciccarese, Paolo
    Wu, Elizabeth
    Wong, Gwen
    Ocana, Marco
    Kinoshita, June
    Ruttenberg, Alan
    Clark, Tim
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2008, 41 (05) : 739 - 751
  • [34] A Personalized Ontology Recommendation System to Effectively Support Ontology Development by Reuse
    Abdelreheim, Marwa
    Soliman, Taysir Hassan A.
    Klan, Friederike
    FUTURE INTERNET, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [35] Ontology for biomedical investigations (OBI)
    Peters, Bjoern
    Overton, James
    Vita, Randi
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [36] Interactive biomedical ontology matching
    Xue, Xingsi
    Hang, Zhi
    Tang, Zhengyi
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04):
  • [37] A Methodology for Biomedical Ontology Reuse
    Zulkarnain, Nur Zareen
    Meziane, Farid
    Crofts, Gillian
    NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, NLDB 2016, 2016, 9612 : 3 - 14
  • [38] DAEOM: A Deep Attentional Embedding Approach for Biomedical Ontology Matching
    Wu, Jifang
    Lv, Jianghua
    Guo, Haoming
    Ma, Shilong
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (21): : 1 - 17
  • [39] An approach to automatic ontology-based annotation of biomedical texts
    Diallo, Gayo
    Simonet, Michel
    Simonet, Ana
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED ARTICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4031 : 1024 - 1033
  • [40] Biomedical Ontology Quality Assurance Using a Big Data Approach
    Cui, Licong
    Tao, Shiqiang
    Zhang, Guo-Qiang
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY FROM DATA, 2016, 10 (04)