NCBO Ontology Recommender 2.0: an enhanced approach for biomedical ontology recommendation

被引:55
|
作者
Martinez-Romero, Marcos [1 ]
Jonquet, Clement [1 ,3 ]
O'Connor, Martin J. [1 ]
Graybeal, John [1 ]
Pazos, Alejandro [2 ]
Musen, Mark A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford Ctr Biomed Informat Res, 1265 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ A Coruna, Dept Informat & Commun Technol, Comp Sci Bldg,Elvina Campus, La Coruna 15071, Spain
[3] Univ Montpellier, LIRMM, 161 rue Ada, F-34095 Montpellier 5, France
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Ontology selection; Ontology recommendation; Ontology evaluation; Semantic Web; Biomedical ontologies; NCBO BioPortal; NATIONAL-CENTER; BIO-ONTOLOGIES; SEARCH; SYSTEM; TOOL;
D O I
10.1186/s13326-017-0128-y
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Ontologies and controlled terminologies have become increasingly important in biomedical research. Researchers use ontologies to annotate their data with ontology terms, enabling better data integration and interoperability across disparate datasets. However, the number, variety and complexity of current biomedical ontologies make it cumbersome for researchers to determine which ones to reuse for their specific needs. To overcome this problem, in 2010 the National Center for Biomedical Ontology (NCBO) released the Ontology Recommender, which is a service that receives a biomedical text corpus or a list of keywords and suggests ontologies appropriate for referencing the indicated terms. Methods: We developed a new version of the NCBO Ontology Recommender. Called Ontology Recommender 2.0, it uses a novel recommendation approach that evaluates the relevance of an ontology to biomedical text data according to four different criteria: (1) the extent to which the ontology covers the input data; (2) the acceptance of the ontology in the biomedical community; (3) the level of detail of the ontology classes that cover the input data; and (4) the specialization of the ontology to the domain of the input data. Results: Our evaluation shows that the enhanced recommender provides higher quality suggestions than the original approach, providing better coverage of the input data, more detailed information about their concepts, increased specialization for the domain of the input data, and greater acceptance and use in the community. In addition, it provides users with more explanatory information, along with suggestions of not only individual ontologies but also groups of ontologies to use together. It also can be customized to fit the needs of different ontology recommendation scenarios. Conclusions: Ontology Recommender 2.0 suggests relevant ontologies for annotating biomedical text data. It combines the strengths of its predecessor with a range of adjustments and new features that improve its reliability and usefulness. Ontology Recommender 2.0 recommends over 500 biomedical ontologies from the NCBO BioPortal platform, where it is openly available (both via the user interface at http://bioportal. bioontology. org/recommender, and via a Web service API).
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Towards a BPMN 2.0 Ontology
    Natschlaeger, Christine
    BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL AND NOTATION (BPMN 2011), 2011, 95 : 1 - 15
  • [22] Web 2.0 and the Ontology of the Digital
    Evens, Aden
    DIGITAL HUMANITIES QUARTERLY, 2012, 6 (02):
  • [23] An ontology based recommendation system
    Zinnikus, I
    Fraser, C
    Fischer, K
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1AND 2, 2004, : 748 - 753
  • [24] Correction to: An ontology supported hybrid approach for recommendation in emergency situations
    Sonia Mehla
    Sarika Jain
    Annals of Telecommunications, 2021, 76 : 115 - 116
  • [25] An Ontology-based Approach on Intelligent Recommendation in Movie Field
    Nie Guihua
    Xia Huan
    Li Xiaofei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 1489 - 1494
  • [26] An Approach to Ontology Integration for Ontology Reuse
    Caldarola, Enrico G.
    Rinaldi, Antonio M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION (IEEE IRI), 2016, : 384 - 393
  • [27] Ontology Editors Approach for Ontology Engineering
    Siricharoen, Waralak V.
    CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS (ICCAR), 2018, : 373 - 378
  • [28] The National Center for Biomedical Ontology
    Musen, Mark A.
    Noy, Natalya F.
    Shah, Nigam H.
    Whetzel, Patricia L.
    Chute, Christopher G.
    Story, Margaret-Anne
    Smith, Barry
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2012, 19 (02) : 190 - 195
  • [29] Biomedical Ontology Matching as a Service
    Amin, Muhammad Bilal
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Khan, Wajahat Ali
    Lee, Sungyoung
    SMART HOMES AND HEALTH TELEMATICS, 2015, 8456 : 195 - 203
  • [30] Methodology for Biomedical Ontology Matching
    Vatascinova, Jana
    SEMANTIC WEB: ESWC 2019 SATELLITE EVENTS, 2019, 11762 : 242 - 250