NCBO Ontology Recommender 2.0: an enhanced approach for biomedical ontology recommendation

被引:53
|
作者
Martinez-Romero, Marcos [1 ]
Jonquet, Clement [1 ,3 ]
O'Connor, Martin J. [1 ]
Graybeal, John [1 ]
Pazos, Alejandro [2 ]
Musen, Mark A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford Ctr Biomed Informat Res, 1265 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ A Coruna, Dept Informat & Commun Technol, Comp Sci Bldg,Elvina Campus, La Coruna 15071, Spain
[3] Univ Montpellier, LIRMM, 161 rue Ada, F-34095 Montpellier 5, France
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Ontology selection; Ontology recommendation; Ontology evaluation; Semantic Web; Biomedical ontologies; NCBO BioPortal; NATIONAL-CENTER; BIO-ONTOLOGIES; SEARCH; SYSTEM; TOOL;
D O I
10.1186/s13326-017-0128-y
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Ontologies and controlled terminologies have become increasingly important in biomedical research. Researchers use ontologies to annotate their data with ontology terms, enabling better data integration and interoperability across disparate datasets. However, the number, variety and complexity of current biomedical ontologies make it cumbersome for researchers to determine which ones to reuse for their specific needs. To overcome this problem, in 2010 the National Center for Biomedical Ontology (NCBO) released the Ontology Recommender, which is a service that receives a biomedical text corpus or a list of keywords and suggests ontologies appropriate for referencing the indicated terms. Methods: We developed a new version of the NCBO Ontology Recommender. Called Ontology Recommender 2.0, it uses a novel recommendation approach that evaluates the relevance of an ontology to biomedical text data according to four different criteria: (1) the extent to which the ontology covers the input data; (2) the acceptance of the ontology in the biomedical community; (3) the level of detail of the ontology classes that cover the input data; and (4) the specialization of the ontology to the domain of the input data. Results: Our evaluation shows that the enhanced recommender provides higher quality suggestions than the original approach, providing better coverage of the input data, more detailed information about their concepts, increased specialization for the domain of the input data, and greater acceptance and use in the community. In addition, it provides users with more explanatory information, along with suggestions of not only individual ontologies but also groups of ontologies to use together. It also can be customized to fit the needs of different ontology recommendation scenarios. Conclusions: Ontology Recommender 2.0 suggests relevant ontologies for annotating biomedical text data. It combines the strengths of its predecessor with a range of adjustments and new features that improve its reliability and usefulness. Ontology Recommender 2.0 recommends over 500 biomedical ontologies from the NCBO BioPortal platform, where it is openly available (both via the user interface at http://bioportal. bioontology. org/recommender, and via a Web service API).
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NCBO Ontology Recommender 2.0: an enhanced approach for biomedical ontology recommendation
    Marcos Martínez-Romero
    Clement Jonquet
    Martin J. O’Connor
    John Graybeal
    Alejandro Pazos
    Mark A. Musen
    Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 8
  • [2] Building a biomedical ontology recommender web service
    Jonquet C.
    Musen M.A.
    Shah N.H.
    Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 1 (Suppl 1)
  • [3] NCBO Resource Index: Ontology-based search and mining of biomedical resources
    Jonquet, Clement
    LePendu, Paea
    Falconer, Sean
    Coulet, Adrien
    Noy, Natalya F.
    Musen, Mark A.
    Shah, Nigam H.
    JOURNAL OF WEB SEMANTICS, 2011, 9 (03): : 316 - 324
  • [4] Ontology Based Scientific Keywords Recommendation System under Web 2.0
    Xue, Na
    Jia, Su Ling
    Hao, Jin Xing
    Wang, Qiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2013, 8 (04) : 17 - 22
  • [5] An ontology supported hybrid approach for recommendation in emergency situations
    Mehla, Sonia
    Jain, Sarika
    ANNALS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 75 (7-8) : 421 - 435
  • [6] An ontology supported hybrid approach for recommendation in emergency situations
    Sonia Mehla
    Sarika Jain
    Annals of Telecommunications, 2020, 75 : 421 - 435
  • [7] An Ontology-based Approach for Mobile Personalized Recommendation
    Xu Yingchen
    Gu Junzhong
    Yang Jing
    Zhang Zhengyong
    2009 IITA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICES SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 336 - 339
  • [8] Exploiting Ontology Recommendation Using Text Categorization Approach
    Sarwar, Muhammad Azeem
    Ahmed, Mansoor
    Habib, Asad
    Khalid, Muhammad
    Ali, M. Akhtar
    Raza, Mohsin
    Hussain, Shahid
    Ahmed, Ghufran
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 27304 - 27322
  • [9] Mechanisms in biomedical ontology
    Johannes Röhl
    Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 3 (Suppl 2)
  • [10] The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations
    Bandrowski, Anita
    Brinkman, Ryan
    Brochhausen, Mathias
    Brush, Matthew H.
    Bug, Bill
    Chibucos, Marcus C.
    Clancy, Kevin
    Courtot, Melanie
    Derom, Dirk
    Dumontier, Michel
    Fan, Liju
    Fostel, Jennifer
    Fragoso, Gilberto
    Gibson, Frank
    Gonzalez-Beltran, Alejandra
    Haendel, Melissa A.
    He, Yongqun
    Heiskanen, Mervi
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina
    Jensen, Mark
    Lin, Yu
    Lister, Allyson L.
    Lord, Phillip
    Malone, James
    Manduchi, Elisabetta
    McGee, Monnie
    Morrison, Norman
    Overton, James A.
    Parkinson, Helen
    Peters, Bjoern
    Rocca-Serra, Philippe
    Ruttenberg, Alan
    Sansone, Susanna-Assunta
    Scheuermann, Richard H.
    Schober, Daniel
    Smith, Barry
    Soldatova, Larisa N.
    Stoeckert, Christian J., Jr.
    Taylor, Chris F.
    Torniai, Carlo
    Turner, Jessica A.
    Vita, Randi
    Whetzel, Patricia L.
    Zheng, Jie
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04):