A model for coal supplier evaluation of coal-fired power plant based on fuzzy DEA (ID: 6-045)

被引:0
|
作者
Li Wei [1 ]
Cheng Limin [1 ]
Wang Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] N China Elect Power Univ, Dept Econ Management, Baoding 071003, Peoples R China
关键词
power plant; index system; fuzzification; fuzzy DEA model; supplier evaluation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
There have been great changes in the whole electric supply chain due to electric power system reform in China. Power plants are the main blocks of power market'competition. They must reduce production cost and combine internal and external resources to gain continuable competitiveness. Since coal is the most important material for coal-fired power plants and possesses a large portion in total cost, it has been a key strategic issue for power plants to evaluate and select upstream coal suppliers. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been widely used in evaluating decision making units' (DMUs') relative efficiency, but it has several limitations as below: being sensitive to errors; excluding qualitative and moderate indices. This paper is based on a 'simulation example to assess the relative efficiency of coal suppliers. In that process, an evaluation index system is constructed, including quantitative and qualitative indices; positive, negative and moderate indices as well. Specifically, fuzzification models are formulated for every kind of indices. With the index fuzzification results, a fuzzy DEA model is constructed, taking qualitative and moderate indices into account, providing a more comprehensive evaluation method than traditional DEA model.
引用
收藏
页码:2359 / 2365
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simulation of Emission from Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Nemalipuri, Pruthiviraj
    Das, Harish Chandra
    Pradhan, Malay Kumar
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, ICRIDME 2018, 2020, : 975 - 986
  • [32] Coal-fired power plant costs will plunge by 2005
    不详
    POWER ENGINEERING, 1996, 100 (01) : 5 - 5
  • [33] Should a coal-fired power plant be replaced or retrofitted?
    Patino-Echeverri, Dalia
    Morel, Benoit
    Apt, Jay
    Chen, Chao
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (23) : 7980 - 7986
  • [34] Mercury emissions of a coal-fired power plant in Germany
    Weigelt, Andreas
    Slemr, Franz
    Ebinghaus, Ralf
    Pirrone, Nicola
    Bieser, Johannes
    Boedewadt, Jan
    Esposito, Giulio
    van Velthoven, Peter F. J.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2016, 16 (21) : 13653 - 13668
  • [35] Economics of a coal-fired power plant - exergy approach
    Ziher, D
    Poredos, A
    Zager, M
    Proceedings of ECOS 2005, Vols 1-3: SHAPING OUR FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2005, : 519 - 525
  • [36] Risk assessment of explosion in coal-fired power plant
    Lebecki, K.
    Rosmus, P.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY FOR MANAGING RISK, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 2185 - +
  • [37] Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of a coal-fired power plant
    Uysal, Cuneyt
    Kurt, Huseyin
    Kwak, Ho-Young
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2017, 117 : 106 - 120
  • [38] Radionuclide emissions from a coal-fired power plant
    Amin, Y. M.
    Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin
    Shyen, A. K. S.
    Mahat, R. H.
    Nor, R. M.
    Bradley, D. A.
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2013, 80 : 109 - 116
  • [39] High efficiency coal-fired power plant of the future
    Lobachyov, KV
    Richter, HJ
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 38 (15-17) : 1693 - 1699
  • [40] Robustified optimal control of a coal-fired power plant
    Simon, E.
    Stoica, C.
    Rodriguez-Ayerbe, P.
    Dumur, D.
    Wertz, V.
    2010 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2010, : 1217 - 1222