An integrated framework for analysing performance indicators of Indian microfinance institutions: a multi-stakeholder perspective

被引:8
|
作者
Bardhan, Amit Kumar [1 ]
Nag, Barnali [1 ]
Mishra, Chandra Sekhar [1 ]
Tarei, Pradeep Kumar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Vinod Gupta Sch Management, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
[2] Gandhi Inst Technol & Management, GITAM Inst Management, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Performance measurement; Microfinance; Decision-making; DEMATEL; ANP; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL EFFICIENCY; DETERMINANTS; OUTREACH; PRODUCTIVITY; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; STRATEGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/BIJ-09-2020-0470
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose An amalgamation of Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Analytical Network Process (ANP) has been performed to develop a decision-making framework for improving the overall performance of the microfinance institutions. A primary survey was conducted to collect real-time data from the heterogeneous stakeholders of microfinance institutions across India. The validation of the proposed framework is performed by comparing the results against the conventional method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Design/methodology/approach This study identifies various dimensions and indicators for measuring the performance of Indian microfinance institutions. Additionally, the ranking and prioritisation of the performance dimensions and indicators is obtained by considering the mutual interrelation between them. Findings The study indicates that there exists a significant dyadic relationship between financial performance and social performance for improving the overall performance of the microfinance institutions. Governance is found to unidirectionally influence both financial and social performance. Among all the considered dimensions, financial performance of a microfinance institution is the most critical dimension for improving the overall performance. The top five performance indicators of the Indian microfinance institutions are funding source, borrowing and overhead cost, size of the firm, end-use of the money and depth of outreach. Research limitations/implications The study was conducted in the context of Indian microfinance institutions; hence the scope of generalisation of the results is limited. This research considers both subjective and objective aspect of the performance dimensions and indicators from the perspective of multiple stakeholders (i.e. firm, society and regulator). The integrated framework is expected to aid in improving overall performance of microfinance institutions by focusing on the most critical (high prioritised) performance indicators. Originality/value An integrated DEMATEL-ANP framework is used in the domain of microfinance to assess the performance dimensions. This study is unique in terms of analysing performance of microfinance institutions from the perspective of heterogeneous stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:2711 / 2740
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The core of secondary level quantum education: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Merzel, Avraham
    Bitzenbauer, Philipp
    Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, Kim
    Stadermann, Kirsten
    Andreotti, Erica
    Anttila, Daria
    Bondani, Maria
    Chiofalo, Maria Luisa
    Faletic, Sergej
    Frans, Renaat
    Goorney, Simon
    Greinert, Franziska
    Jurcic, Leon
    Koupilova, Zdenka
    Malgieri, Massimiliano
    Mueller, Rainer
    Onorato, Pasquale
    Pospiech, Gesche
    Ubben, Malte
    Woitzik, Andreas
    Pol, Henk
    EPJ QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [42] An Integrated and Multi-Stakeholder Approach for Sustainable Phosphorus Management in Agriculture
    Colombo, Federico
    Pesenti, Michele
    Araniti, Fabrizio
    Pilu, Salvatore Roberto
    Nocito, Fabio Francesco
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [43] Implementing sustainable tourism: A multi-stakeholder involvement management framework
    Waligo, Victoria M.
    Clarke, Jackie
    Hawkins, Rebecca
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 36 : 342 - 353
  • [44] A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards
    Pereno, Amina
    Eriksson, Daniel
    FUTURES, 2020, 122
  • [45] Options for imaging cellular therapeutics in vivo: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Helfer, Brooke M.
    Ponomarev, Vladimir
    Patrick, P. Stephen
    Blower, Philip J.
    Feitel, Alexandra
    Fruhwirth, Gilbert O.
    Jackman, Shawna
    Mouries, Lucilia Pereira
    Park, Margriet V. D. Z.
    Srinivas, Mangala
    Stuckey, Daniel J.
    Thu, Mya S.
    van den Hoorn, Tineke
    Herberts, Carla A.
    Shingleton, William D.
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2021, 23 (09) : 757 - 773
  • [46] Discursive Tensions in CSR Multi-stakeholder Dialogue: A Foucauldian Perspective
    Christiane Marie Høvring
    Sophie Esmann Andersen
    Anne Ellerup Nielsen
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 152 : 627 - 645
  • [47] Multi-stakeholder perceptions of drought utilizing a conceptual framework for drought
    Lottering, S. J.
    Mafongoya, P.
    Lottering, R. T.
    SOUTH AFRICAN GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 105 (01) : 115 - 133
  • [48] A framework for multi-stakeholder decision-making and conflict resolution
    Dowling, Alexander W.
    Ruiz-Mercado, Gerardo
    Zavala, Victor M.
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 90 : 136 - 150
  • [49] Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi-stakeholder perspective on causes and effects
    Severin, Anna
    Chataway, Joanna
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2021, 34 (04) : 537 - 546
  • [50] Multi-stakeholder involvement and urban green space performance
    Azadi, Hossein
    Ho, Peter
    Hafni, Erni
    Zarafshani, Kiumars
    Witlox, Frank
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 54 (06) : 785 - 811