An integrated framework for analysing performance indicators of Indian microfinance institutions: a multi-stakeholder perspective

被引:8
|
作者
Bardhan, Amit Kumar [1 ]
Nag, Barnali [1 ]
Mishra, Chandra Sekhar [1 ]
Tarei, Pradeep Kumar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Vinod Gupta Sch Management, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
[2] Gandhi Inst Technol & Management, GITAM Inst Management, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Performance measurement; Microfinance; Decision-making; DEMATEL; ANP; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL EFFICIENCY; DETERMINANTS; OUTREACH; PRODUCTIVITY; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; STRATEGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/BIJ-09-2020-0470
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose An amalgamation of Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Analytical Network Process (ANP) has been performed to develop a decision-making framework for improving the overall performance of the microfinance institutions. A primary survey was conducted to collect real-time data from the heterogeneous stakeholders of microfinance institutions across India. The validation of the proposed framework is performed by comparing the results against the conventional method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Design/methodology/approach This study identifies various dimensions and indicators for measuring the performance of Indian microfinance institutions. Additionally, the ranking and prioritisation of the performance dimensions and indicators is obtained by considering the mutual interrelation between them. Findings The study indicates that there exists a significant dyadic relationship between financial performance and social performance for improving the overall performance of the microfinance institutions. Governance is found to unidirectionally influence both financial and social performance. Among all the considered dimensions, financial performance of a microfinance institution is the most critical dimension for improving the overall performance. The top five performance indicators of the Indian microfinance institutions are funding source, borrowing and overhead cost, size of the firm, end-use of the money and depth of outreach. Research limitations/implications The study was conducted in the context of Indian microfinance institutions; hence the scope of generalisation of the results is limited. This research considers both subjective and objective aspect of the performance dimensions and indicators from the perspective of multiple stakeholders (i.e. firm, society and regulator). The integrated framework is expected to aid in improving overall performance of microfinance institutions by focusing on the most critical (high prioritised) performance indicators. Originality/value An integrated DEMATEL-ANP framework is used in the domain of microfinance to assess the performance dimensions. This study is unique in terms of analysing performance of microfinance institutions from the perspective of heterogeneous stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:2711 / 2740
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A multi-stakeholder IMC framework for networked brand identity
    Orazi, Davide C.
    Spry, Amanda
    Theilacker, Max N.
    Vredenburg, Jessica
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2017, 51 (03) : 551 - 571
  • [22] Practice of Sustainability Leadership: A Multi-Stakeholder Inclusive Framework
    Jayashree, Payyazhi
    El Barachi, May
    Hamza, Feras
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [23] Expanding Neonatal Bloodspot Screening: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective
    van Dijk, Tessa
    Kater, Adriana
    Jansen, Marleen
    Dondorp, Wybo J.
    Blom, Maartje
    Kemp, Stephan
    Langeveld, Mirjam
    Cornel, Martina C.
    van der Pal, Sylvia M.
    Henneman, Lidewij
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2021, 9
  • [24] THE INTRODUCTION OF PROGRAMMING IN COMPULSORY SCHOOL - A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVE
    Mozelius, P.
    Hoff, C.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI 2019), 2019, : 2032 - 2040
  • [25] Organizational politics and employee performance in the service industry: A multi-stakeholder, multi-level perspective
    Takeuchi, Riki
    Yu, Nadia Yin
    Lin, Cheng-Chen
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2022, 133
  • [26] A guiding framework for multi-stakeholder contracting in executive coaching
    Burger, Zelda
    Van Coller-Peter, Salome
    SA JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 17
  • [27] Multi-stakeholder perspective on the role of universities in place branding
    Bisani, Shalini
    Daye, Marcella
    Mortimer, Kathleen
    JOURNAL OF PLACE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 15 (02) : 112 - 129
  • [28] Implementation of Pharmacogenetics in Primary Care: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective
    Rigter, Tessel
    Jansen, Marleen E.
    de Groot, Jordy M.
    Janssen, Susan W. J.
    Rodenburg, Wendy
    Cornel, Martina C.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2020, 11
  • [29] Media Education in Turkey: Toward a Multi-Stakeholder Framework
    Orhon, E. Nezih
    COMUNICAR, 2009, 16 (32) : 157 - 166
  • [30] PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FRAMEWORKS IN THE CONTEXT OF INDIAN MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS
    Balammal, Aruna
    Madhumathi, R.
    Ganesh, M. P.
    FOUNDATIONS OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 11 (01) : 209 - 228