The Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcomes After Knee Cartilage Repair

被引:50
|
作者
Chahal, Jaskarndip [1 ,2 ]
Lansdown, Drew A. [1 ,3 ]
Davey, Annabelle [1 ,4 ]
Davis, Aileen M. [1 ,5 ]
Cole, Brian J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Womens Coll Hosp, Orthopaed Sports Med Program, 7430-76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Midwest Orthopaed, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[5] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2021年 / 49卷 / 01期
关键词
clinically important difference; Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State; patient-reported outcome measures; cartilage restoration; cartilage repair; knee;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520969883
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In patients undergoing cartilage restoration of the knee, limited information is available regarding clinically important difference (CID) and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) estimates for commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine the CID and PASS in the population with knee cartilage restoration for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) score, and the Lysholm score. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Between 2012 and 2017, patients who underwent a cartilage restoration procedure were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed the KOOS, IKDC, and Lysholm, all of which were scored from 0 to 100, and completed relevant anchor questions at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to determine CID and PASS cutoff points. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of age, sex, and baseline score on likelihood of achieving CID and PASS. Results: Of the 113 patients enrolled, 53 (47%) were male, and the mean age was 36 years. The CID values for the PROMs were 10.7 for KOOS Symptoms, 8.3 for KOOS Pain, 8.8 for KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL), 30.0 for KOOS Sports and Recreation, 18.8 for KOOS Quality of Life (QOL), 9.2 for IKDC, and 13.0 for Lysholm. The PASS values were 71.5 for KOOS Symptoms, 72.2 for KOOS Pain, 86.8 for KOOS ADL, 43.8 for KOOS Sports and Recreation, 50.0 for KOOS QOL, 62.1 for IKDC, and 70.0 for Lysholm. Patients with higher baseline scores were more likely to achieve PASS for the IKDC (odds ratio, 2.28; P = .03). Baseline score did not have an effect on the likelihood of achieving CID. Younger age was an independent predictor of achieving PASS and CID across all outcomes (P < .05), but sex did not have such an effect. Conclusion: This study determined CID and PASS values for the KOOS, IKDC, and Lysholm scores among patients treated with knee cartilage restoration. Younger age was a positive prognostic variable, and higher baseline scores implied achieving PASS for the IKDC. The information in this study can be used in designing randomized controlled trials, counseling individual patients as to anticipated outcomes, and conducting responder analyses when evaluating new cartilage technology from a regulatory perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 199
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-Reported Outcomes After Tetralogy of Fallot Repair
    Kovacs, Adrienne H.
    Lebovic, Gerald
    Raptis, Stavroula
    Blais, Samuel
    Caldarone, Christopher A.
    Dahdah, Nagib
    Dallaire, Frederic
    Drolet, Christian
    Grewal, Jasmine
    Friesen, Camille L. Hancock
    Hickey, Edward
    Karur, Gauri Rani
    Khairy, Paul
    Leonardi, Benedetta
    Keir, Michelle
    McCrindle, Brian W.
    Nadeem, Syed Najaf
    Ng, Ming-Yen
    Shah, Ashish H.
    Tham, Edythe B.
    Therrien, Judith
    Warren, Andrew E.
    Muhll, Isabelle F. Vonder
    Bruaene, Alexander Van de
    Yamamura, Kenichiro
    Farkouh, Michael E.
    Wald, Rachel M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (19) : 1937 - 1950
  • [32] Patient-reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair
    N. van Veenendaal
    M. M. Poelman
    B. van den Heuvel
    B. J. Dwars
    W. H. Schreurs
    J. H. M. B. Stoot
    H. J. Bonjer
    Hernia, 2021, 25 : 1677 - 1684
  • [33] The minimal clinically important difference of app-based electronic patient-reported outcomes for hay fever
    Nagino, Ken
    Sung, Jaemyoung
    Midorikawa-Inomata, Akie
    Eguchi, Atsuko
    Fujimoto, Keiichi
    Okumura, Yuichi
    Yee, Alan
    Fujio, Kenta
    Akasaki, Yasutsugu
    Huang, Tianxiang
    Miura, Maria
    Hurramhon, Shokirova
    Hirosawa, Kunihiko
    Ohno, Mizu
    Morooka, Yuki
    Kobayashi, Hiroyuki
    Inomata, Takenori
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [34] Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement and Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Hand Surgeons
    Garcia, Brittany N.
    Tyser, Andrew
    Roca, Hernan
    Kazmers, Nikolas H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (15) : 756 - 765
  • [35] Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Sedaghat, Ahmad R.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2019, 161 (04) : 551 - 560
  • [36] Patient-reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair
    van Veenendaal, N.
    Poelman, M. M.
    van den Heuvel, B.
    Dwars, B. J.
    Schreurs, W. H.
    Stoot, J. H. M. B.
    Bonjer, H. J.
    HERNIA, 2021, 25 (06) : 1677 - 1684
  • [37] Determining a Minimum Clinically Important Difference Between Treatments for a Patient-Reported Outcome
    Kirby, Simon
    Chuang-Stein, Christy
    Morris, Mark
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2010, 20 (05) : 1043 - 1054
  • [38] Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for KOOS After Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Emara, Ahmed K.
    Pasqualini, Ignacio
    Jin, Yuxuan
    Klika, Alison K.
    Orr, Melissa N.
    Rullan, Pedro J.
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2024, 106 (09): : 793 - 800
  • [39] Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiligament Knee Injury: MCL Repair Versus Reconstruction
    Hanley, Jessica M.
    Anthony, Christopher A.
    DeMik, David
    Glass, Natalie
    Amendola, Annunziato
    Wolf, Brian R.
    Bollier, Matthew
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (03):
  • [40] Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Patient-Reported Outcomes After TKA Depend on Central Sensitization
    Kim, Man Soo
    Koh, In Jun
    Choi, Keun Young
    Seo, Jeong Yong
    In, Yong
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (15): : 1374 - 1382