The Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcomes After Knee Cartilage Repair

被引:50
|
作者
Chahal, Jaskarndip [1 ,2 ]
Lansdown, Drew A. [1 ,3 ]
Davey, Annabelle [1 ,4 ]
Davis, Aileen M. [1 ,5 ]
Cole, Brian J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Womens Coll Hosp, Orthopaed Sports Med Program, 7430-76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Midwest Orthopaed, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[5] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2021年 / 49卷 / 01期
关键词
clinically important difference; Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State; patient-reported outcome measures; cartilage restoration; cartilage repair; knee;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520969883
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In patients undergoing cartilage restoration of the knee, limited information is available regarding clinically important difference (CID) and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) estimates for commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine the CID and PASS in the population with knee cartilage restoration for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) score, and the Lysholm score. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Between 2012 and 2017, patients who underwent a cartilage restoration procedure were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed the KOOS, IKDC, and Lysholm, all of which were scored from 0 to 100, and completed relevant anchor questions at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to determine CID and PASS cutoff points. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of age, sex, and baseline score on likelihood of achieving CID and PASS. Results: Of the 113 patients enrolled, 53 (47%) were male, and the mean age was 36 years. The CID values for the PROMs were 10.7 for KOOS Symptoms, 8.3 for KOOS Pain, 8.8 for KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL), 30.0 for KOOS Sports and Recreation, 18.8 for KOOS Quality of Life (QOL), 9.2 for IKDC, and 13.0 for Lysholm. The PASS values were 71.5 for KOOS Symptoms, 72.2 for KOOS Pain, 86.8 for KOOS ADL, 43.8 for KOOS Sports and Recreation, 50.0 for KOOS QOL, 62.1 for IKDC, and 70.0 for Lysholm. Patients with higher baseline scores were more likely to achieve PASS for the IKDC (odds ratio, 2.28; P = .03). Baseline score did not have an effect on the likelihood of achieving CID. Younger age was an independent predictor of achieving PASS and CID across all outcomes (P < .05), but sex did not have such an effect. Conclusion: This study determined CID and PASS values for the KOOS, IKDC, and Lysholm scores among patients treated with knee cartilage restoration. Younger age was a positive prognostic variable, and higher baseline scores implied achieving PASS for the IKDC. The information in this study can be used in designing randomized controlled trials, counseling individual patients as to anticipated outcomes, and conducting responder analyses when evaluating new cartilage technology from a regulatory perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 199
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Minimum Clinically Important Difference A Metric That Matters in the Age of Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Karhade, Aditya, V
    Bono, Christopher M.
    Schwab, Joseph H.
    Tobert, Daniel G.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (24): : 2331 - 2337
  • [12] MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE OF TOTAL KNEE ARTROPLASTY PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES
    Kacmaz, K. S.
    Unver, T.
    Unver, B.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 : 1614 - 1614
  • [13] Effect of Patient Characteristics on the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
    Pasqualini, Ignacio
    Tanoira, Ignacio
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Ranalletta, Maximiliano
    Rossi, Luciano Andres
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (01): : 174 - 180
  • [14] Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis
    Puzzitiello, Richard N.
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Agarwalla, Avinesh
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Forsythe, Brian
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (04) : 639 - 647
  • [15] Rethinking dental research: the importance of patient-reported outcomes and minimally clinically important difference
    La Rosa, Giusy Rita Maria
    EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY, 2024, 25 (03) : 117 - 118
  • [16] Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state
    Tubach, F
    Ravaud, P
    Baron, G
    Falissard, B
    Logeart, I
    Bellamy, N
    Bombardier, C
    Felson, D
    Hochberg, M
    van der Heijde, D
    Dougados, M
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 (01) : 34 - 37
  • [17] Defining patient acceptable symptom state thresholds for commonly used patient reported outcomes measures in general orthopedic practice
    Wright, Alexis A.
    Hensley, Craig P.
    Gilbertson, Jennifer
    Leland, John M., III
    Jackson, Steven
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2015, 20 (06) : 814 - 819
  • [18] Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair
    Okoroha, Kelechi R.
    Beck, Edward C.
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Kunze, Kyle N.
    Nho, Shane J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (13): : 3141 - 3147
  • [19] Practical issues encountered while determining Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Woaye-Hune, Pascal
    Hardouin, Jean-Benoit
    Lehur, Paul-Antoine
    Meurette, Guillaume
    Vanier, Antoine
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [20] Practical issues encountered while determining Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Pascal Woaye-Hune
    Jean-Benoit Hardouin
    Paul-Antoine Lehur
    Guillaume Meurette
    Antoine Vanier
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18