A modified technique of transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection for upper rectal or lower sigmoid colon cancer: a retrospective study

被引:6
|
作者
Yu, Si [1 ]
Ji, Yong [2 ]
Luo, Tedong [2 ]
Xu, Pengjie [2 ]
Zhen, Zuojun [2 ]
Deng, Jianzhong [2 ]
机构
[1] Second Peoples Hosp Foshan, Dept Gen Surg, Foshan, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Peoples Hosp Foshan 1, Foshan Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Foshan, Peoples R China
关键词
Transanal specimen extraction; Laparoscopic anterior rectal resection; Colorectal cancer;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-021-01085-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn recent years, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has become a field of special interest for colorectal surgeons. Some researchers have reported transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection, including intersphincteric resection (ISR) and rectal eversion-resection. However, these surgical procedures have certain limitations. Based on the proven expertise in laparoscopic surgery, our center has developed a modified technique of transanal specimen extraction. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of a modified technique of transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection.MethodsFrom January 2011 to January 2014, the patients with upper rectal or lower sigmoid colon cancer who had undergone laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with specimen extraction by a modified transanal technique were enrolled in the observation group, and the patients who had undergone laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with specimen extraction via an abdominal incision by the same surgeons during the same period were enrolled in the control group.ResultsA total of 36 patients were included in the observation group and 128 patients were included in the control group. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the two groups in terms of the mean operative time [14410 min vs. 141 +/- 11 min], mean intraoperative blood loss [63 +/- 6 ml vs. 61 +/- 7 ml], and the mean time to anal exhaust [67 +/- 7 h vs. 65 +/- 8 h]. However, there were significant differences (P<0.05) between the two groups in terms of the mean postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores [3.4 +/- 1.1 vs. 4.5 +/- 1.2], mean postoperative hospital stay [6.0 +/- 1.1 days +/- vs. 7.2 +/- 1.2 days], and incidence of postoperative complications (4/36 vs. 15/128). Long-term follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the two groups in terms of the 3- or 5-year overall survival.Conclusions The modified technique of transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection fulfilled the principle of no-neoplasm touch technique, with advantages, such as minimal trauma, rapid recovery, and fewer complications. Long-term follow-up results also showed satisfactory oncological outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A feasibility study of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Inomata, Masafumi
    Shiroshita, Hidefumi
    Etoh, Tsuyoshi
    Moriyama, Hatsuo
    Yasuda, Kazuhiro
    Noguchi, Tsuyoshi
    Shiraishi, Norio
    Kitano, Seigo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 25 : A172 - A173
  • [32] Totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has more advantages comparing with laparoscopic-assisted resection for selected patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer
    Zhang Xingmao
    Zhou Haitao
    Liang Jianwei
    Hou Huirong
    Hu Junjie
    Zhou Zhixiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (09) : 1119 - 1124
  • [33] Totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has more advantages comparing with laparoscopic-assisted resection for selected patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer
    Zhang Xingmao
    Zhou Haitao
    Liang Jianwei
    Hou Huirong
    HU Junjie
    Zhou Zhixiang
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014, 29 : 1119 - 1124
  • [34] Modified Single Stapler Technique in Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
    Akbaba, Soner
    Ersoy, Pamir Eren
    Gundogdu, Riza Haldun
    Ulas, Murat
    Menekse, Ebru
    [J]. JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2015, 25 (01): : 68 - 70
  • [35] Rectal sling technique to assist rectal washout during laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer
    Glaysher, M. A.
    Moore, T.
    Miles, A. J. G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2013, 95 (07) : 531 - 531
  • [36] Laparoscopic lower anterior resection is equivalent to laparotomy for lower rectal cancer at the distal line of resection
    Ichihara, T
    Nagahata, Y
    Nomura, H
    Fukumoto, S
    Urakawa, T
    Aoyama, N
    Kuroda, Y
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (02): : 97 - 98
  • [37] Three-Port with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction versus Conventional Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal-Sigmoid Cancer: A Matched Pair Analysis
    Zhou, Haiyang
    Wang, Anqi
    Lu, Hao
    Wu, Jia
    Ying, Jun
    Hu, Zhiqian
    Ruan, Canping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (04) : 788 - 792
  • [38] Comparison of specimen extraction site and another site for protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective comparative study
    Chao Liu
    Jizhun Zhang
    Leping Li
    Li Zhang
    Liang Shang
    Yan Ma
    [J]. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [39] Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer
    Ding, Yu
    Li, Zenan
    Gao, Haiting
    Cao, Yu
    Jin, Weisen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (05): : 1817 - 1823
  • [40] A Novel Method of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) during Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
    Wang, Jun
    Hong, Jun
    Wang, Qianwei
    Luo, Fen
    Guo, Fenghua
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 2021