A modified technique of transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection for upper rectal or lower sigmoid colon cancer: a retrospective study

被引:6
|
作者
Yu, Si [1 ]
Ji, Yong [2 ]
Luo, Tedong [2 ]
Xu, Pengjie [2 ]
Zhen, Zuojun [2 ]
Deng, Jianzhong [2 ]
机构
[1] Second Peoples Hosp Foshan, Dept Gen Surg, Foshan, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Peoples Hosp Foshan 1, Foshan Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Foshan, Peoples R China
关键词
Transanal specimen extraction; Laparoscopic anterior rectal resection; Colorectal cancer;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-021-01085-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn recent years, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has become a field of special interest for colorectal surgeons. Some researchers have reported transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection, including intersphincteric resection (ISR) and rectal eversion-resection. However, these surgical procedures have certain limitations. Based on the proven expertise in laparoscopic surgery, our center has developed a modified technique of transanal specimen extraction. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of a modified technique of transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection.MethodsFrom January 2011 to January 2014, the patients with upper rectal or lower sigmoid colon cancer who had undergone laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with specimen extraction by a modified transanal technique were enrolled in the observation group, and the patients who had undergone laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with specimen extraction via an abdominal incision by the same surgeons during the same period were enrolled in the control group.ResultsA total of 36 patients were included in the observation group and 128 patients were included in the control group. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the two groups in terms of the mean operative time [14410 min vs. 141 +/- 11 min], mean intraoperative blood loss [63 +/- 6 ml vs. 61 +/- 7 ml], and the mean time to anal exhaust [67 +/- 7 h vs. 65 +/- 8 h]. However, there were significant differences (P<0.05) between the two groups in terms of the mean postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores [3.4 +/- 1.1 vs. 4.5 +/- 1.2], mean postoperative hospital stay [6.0 +/- 1.1 days +/- vs. 7.2 +/- 1.2 days], and incidence of postoperative complications (4/36 vs. 15/128). Long-term follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the two groups in terms of the 3- or 5-year overall survival.Conclusions The modified technique of transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection fulfilled the principle of no-neoplasm touch technique, with advantages, such as minimal trauma, rapid recovery, and fewer complications. Long-term follow-up results also showed satisfactory oncological outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transanal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis from China
    Wang, Ruchen
    Wei, Zhewei
    Liu, Qilong
    Li, Wenfeng
    Xiao, Longbin
    Hang, Fang-hai Han
    Yang, Shibin
    [J]. VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2019, 14 (02) : 203 - 209
  • [22] Laparoscopic ultralow anterior rectal resection in APPEAR technique for deep rectal cancer
    Marquardt, C.
    Koppes, Ph
    Weimann, D.
    Schiedeck, Th
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (04) : 549 - 552
  • [23] Laparoscopic ultralow anterior rectal resection in APPEAR technique for deep rectal cancer
    C. Marquardt
    Ph. Koppes
    D. Weimann
    Th. Schiedeck
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2012, 27 : 549 - 552
  • [24] Laparoscopic high anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for early rectal cancer
    Ooi, B. S.
    Quah, H. M.
    Fu, C. W. P.
    Eu, K. W.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2009, 13 (01) : 61 - 64
  • [25] Laparoscopic high anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for early rectal cancer
    B.S. Ooi
    H.M. Quah
    C.W.P. Fu
    K.W. Eu
    [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2009, 13 : 61 - 64
  • [26] New Anastomosis Technique to Prevent Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer, Especially Upper Rectal Cancer
    Ando, Koji
    Kuriyama, Naotaka
    Fujimoto, Yoshiaki
    Jogo, Tomoko
    Hokonohara, Kentaro
    Hu, Qingjiang
    Hisamatsu, Yuichi
    Nakanishi, Ryota
    Nakashima, Yuichiro
    Kimura, Yasue
    Oki, Eiji
    Mori, Masaki
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (06): : 3533 - 3538
  • [27] Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Cancer With Transanal Extraction Using TEM (Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery)
    Alsina, Janivette
    Sylla, Patricia
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 138 (05) : S851 - S851
  • [28] Clinical application of two-port laparoscopic surgery in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection
    Jiang, Feng
    Ji, Mengmeng
    Jin, Fangtong
    Liu, Junfeng
    Liu, Xiaoping
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [29] Transanal specimen extraction in robotic rectal cancer surgery
    Kang, J.
    Min, B. S.
    Hur, H.
    Kim, N. K.
    Lee, K. Y.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (01) : 133 - 136
  • [30] Outcomes of trans-anal natural orifice specimen extraction combined with laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid and rectal carcinoma An observational study
    Ng, Hoi-loi
    Sun, Wu-qing
    Zhao, Xiao-mu
    Jin, Lan
    Shen, Xi-xi
    Zhang, Zhong-tao
    Wang, Jin
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (38)