Wisconsin PROMISE cost-benefit analysis and sustainability framework

被引:5
|
作者
Anderson, Catherine A. [1 ]
Schlegelmilch, Amanda [2 ]
Hartman, Ellie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Rehabil Psychol & Special Educ, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Stout, Vocat Rehabil Inst, Stout, WI USA
关键词
Transition-age youth; Supplemental Security Income; employment; DISABILITIES; FAMILY;
D O I
10.3233/JVR-191043
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Promoting the Readiness of Minors in Supplemental Security Income (PROMISE) is a federal demonstration grant funded by the U.S. Department of Education in collaboration with Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Social Security Administration. Wisconsin PROMISE is one of six model demonstration sites. OBJECTIVE: This analysis was conducted to help illustrate the estimated costs and potential savings associated with supporting transition-age youth receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) achieve competitive, integrated employment. RESULTS: While not all youth achieve earnings at substantial levels, the research clearly indicates that providing opportunities for employment during the transition age years increases the likelihood of employment in adulthood. Additionally, youth with access to coordinated services and supports are more likely to be employed at higher rates, preparing them for improved employment and earnings trajectories into adulthood. CONCLUSION: Two options are presented, and the integration of employment-focused targeted outreach and case management and/or family navigator advocates is recommended for all transition-age youth receiving SSI and their families.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 261
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On justifying cost-benefit analysis
    Kornhauser, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 1037 - 1057
  • [42] Cost-Benefit Analysis Reference Framework for Human Motion Capture and Analysis Systems
    Lau, Boung Yew Simon
    Ting, Huong Yong
    Tan, Yong Wen Daniel
    [J]. ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2018, 24 (02) : 1249 - 1253
  • [43] Walking, urban design, and health - Toward a cost-benefit analysis framework
    Boarnet, Marlon G.
    Greenwald, Michael
    McMillan, Tracy E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2008, 27 (03) : 341 - 358
  • [44] Cost-benefit analysis of transport projects: Theoretical framework and practical rules
    de Rus, Gines
    Socorro, M. Pilar
    Valido, Jorge
    Campos, Javier
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2022, 123 : 25 - 39
  • [45] Assessment of green roofs in the Philippines using sustainability indicators and cost-benefit analysis
    Orozco, Christian R.
    Madriaga, Danielle Alexandrine D.
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 2022, 79 (05) : 810 - 821
  • [46] Cost-benefit analysis as a part of sustainability assessment of remediation alternatives for contaminated land
    Soderqvist, Tore
    Brinkhoff, Petra
    Norberg, Tommy
    Rosen, Lars
    Back, Par-Erik
    Norrman, Jenny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 157 : 267 - 278
  • [47] A Framework of Cost-Benefit Analysis for Overhead-to-Underground Conversions in Florida
    Xu, L.
    Brown, R. E.
    [J]. 2009 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-8, 2009, : 2543 - 2549
  • [48] Sustainability Factor for the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Building-Integrated Greenery Systems
    Reyes, Marcelo
    Perez, Gabriel
    Coma, Julia
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [49] COST-BENEFIT AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    SCHOR, IM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 304 (07): : 432 - 432
  • [50] Using the Kaldor-Hicks Tableau to assess sustainability in cost-benefit analysis in transport: An example framework for rail transit
    Lane, Bradley W.
    Sherman, Colin P.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 7 : 91 - 105