Sustainability Factor for the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Building-Integrated Greenery Systems

被引:2
|
作者
Reyes, Marcelo [1 ]
Perez, Gabriel [2 ]
Coma, Julia [2 ]
机构
[1] Andres Bello Natl Univ, Engn Fac, Santiago 7500971, Chile
[2] Univ Lleida, Res Grp IT4S, Pere De Cabrera S-N, Lleida 25001, Spain
关键词
nature-based solutions; green roofs; green facades; cost-benefit ratio; sustainability; indicators; measurement; ecosystem services; ROOFS; PERFORMANCE; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/su16010157
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Building-integrated greenery (BIG) systems, which include green roofs and green facades, are well-established nature-based solutions (NBS) with proven scientific benefits. However, initial costs and economic apprehensions stemming from potential negative outcomes act as adoption barriers. Furthermore, the lack of standardized indicators and assessment methodologies for evaluating the city-level impacts of BIG systems presents challenges for investors and policy makers. This paper addresses these issues by presenting a comprehensive set of indicators derived from widely accepted frameworks, such as the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) and the NBS impact evaluation handbook. These indicators contribute to the creation of a 'sustainability factor', which facilitates cost-benefit analyses for BIG projects using locally sourced data. The practical application of this factor to a 3500 m2 green roof in Lleida, Catalonia (Spain) demonstrates that allocating space for urban horticultural production (i.e., food production), CO2 capture, and creating new recreational areas produces benefits that outweigh the costs by a factor value of nine during the operational phase of the green roof. This cost-benefit analysis provides critical insights for investment decisions and public policies, especially considering the significant benefits at the city level associated with the implementation of BIG systems.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Role of Building-Integrated Greenery Systems in Building Sustainability Rating Systems
    Reyes, Marcelo
    Perez, Gabriel
    Coma, Julia
    [J]. LAND, 2024, 13 (08)
  • [2] Cost-benefit analysis into integrated aquaponics systems
    Petrea, Stefan-Mihai
    Bandi, Alexandru-Cristian
    Cristea, Dragos
    Neculita, Mihaela
    [J]. CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2019, 15 (03): : 238 - 268
  • [3] Sustainability and cost-benefit analysis
    Pires, C
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1998, 30 (12) : 2181 - 2194
  • [4] Cost-Benefit Analysis in the era of sustainability
    Diaz Simal, Pedro
    [J]. OCEANS 2009 - EUROPE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 12 - 20
  • [5] Environmental cost-benefit analysis and sustainability
    Common, M
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATED APPRAISAL IN A DEVELOPING WORLD, 2000, : 46 - 64
  • [6] Sustainability of Agricultural Crop Policies in Rwanda: An Integrated Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Miklyaev, Mikhail
    Jenkins, Glenn
    Shobowale, David
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [7] A note on "Environmental sustainability and cost-benefit analysis"
    Pires, CP
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1998, 30 (11) : 2069 - 2073
  • [8] Discounting the Future? Cost-Benefit Analysis and Sustainability
    Mathis, Klaus
    [J]. EFFICIENCY, SUSTAINABILITY, AND JUSTICE TO FUTURE GENERATIONS, 2011, 98 : 165 - 180
  • [9] Cost-benefit analysis method for building solutions
    Araujo, Catarina
    Almeida, Manuela
    Braganca, Luis
    Barbosa, Jose Amarilio
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 173 : 124 - 133
  • [10] HUMAN COST AS A FACTOR USED IN THE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    Janota, Ales
    Rastocny, Karol
    Zahradnik, Jiri
    [J]. TRANSPORT PROBLEMS, 2008, 3 (04) : 45 - 52