Sustainability Factor for the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Building-Integrated Greenery Systems

被引:2
|
作者
Reyes, Marcelo [1 ]
Perez, Gabriel [2 ]
Coma, Julia [2 ]
机构
[1] Andres Bello Natl Univ, Engn Fac, Santiago 7500971, Chile
[2] Univ Lleida, Res Grp IT4S, Pere De Cabrera S-N, Lleida 25001, Spain
关键词
nature-based solutions; green roofs; green facades; cost-benefit ratio; sustainability; indicators; measurement; ecosystem services; ROOFS; PERFORMANCE; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/su16010157
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Building-integrated greenery (BIG) systems, which include green roofs and green facades, are well-established nature-based solutions (NBS) with proven scientific benefits. However, initial costs and economic apprehensions stemming from potential negative outcomes act as adoption barriers. Furthermore, the lack of standardized indicators and assessment methodologies for evaluating the city-level impacts of BIG systems presents challenges for investors and policy makers. This paper addresses these issues by presenting a comprehensive set of indicators derived from widely accepted frameworks, such as the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) and the NBS impact evaluation handbook. These indicators contribute to the creation of a 'sustainability factor', which facilitates cost-benefit analyses for BIG projects using locally sourced data. The practical application of this factor to a 3500 m2 green roof in Lleida, Catalonia (Spain) demonstrates that allocating space for urban horticultural production (i.e., food production), CO2 capture, and creating new recreational areas produces benefits that outweigh the costs by a factor value of nine during the operational phase of the green roof. This cost-benefit analysis provides critical insights for investment decisions and public policies, especially considering the significant benefits at the city level associated with the implementation of BIG systems.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-benefit analysis of living wall systems on school building skins in a hot climate
    Haggag, M.
    Hassan, A.
    [J]. ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY V: SPECIAL CONTRIBUTIONS, 2015, : 3 - 11
  • [22] Cost-benefit analysis
    Miura, Grant
    [J]. NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 903 - 903
  • [23] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BJORNSTAD, P
    [J]. KJEMI, 1975, 35 (10): : 3 - 3
  • [24] Net energy and cost benefit of transparent organic solar cells in building-integrated applications
    Anctil, Annick
    Lee, Eunsang
    Lunt, Richard R.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 261
  • [25] Unit Commitment of Power Systems Integrated With Wind Farms Based on Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Zhang, Liudong
    Yin, Minghui
    Song, Kunlong
    Zou, Yun
    [J]. 2015 27TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2015, : 5509 - 5514
  • [26] Extending cost-benefit analysis for the sustainability impact of inter-urban Intelligent Transport Systems
    Kolosz, Ben
    Grant-Muller, Susan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2015, 50 : 167 - 177
  • [27] Methodological framework for impact evaluation of Building-Integrated Greenery (BIG-impact)
    Perez, Gabriel
    Reyes, Marcelo
    Coma, Julia
    Alva, Aleix
    Beriguete, Fanny E.
    Lacasta, Ana M.
    [J]. METHODSX, 2024, 13
  • [28] Life Cycle Incremental Cost-Benefit Analysis of Green Building
    Chen, Min
    Chen, Jianguo
    Cheng, Xinxin
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF GREEN BUILDING, MATERIALS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-8, 2011, 71-78 : 4645 - 4651
  • [29] Economic Evaluation of Green Building Based On Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Liu, Y.
    Lu, H. M.
    [J]. CRIOCM2009: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 464 - 469
  • [30] Cost-benefit analysis in correspondence related to building the Rideau Canal
    Bujaki, Merridee
    [J]. ACCOUNTING HISTORY, 2010, 15 (02) : 229 - 251