共 50 条
The Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Interventions Tailored to Smoking Parents of Children Aged 0-18 Years: A Meta-Analysis
被引:4
|作者:
Scheffers-van Schayck, Tessa
[1
,2
]
Mujcic, Ajla
[3
,4
]
Otten, Roy
[5
,6
,7
]
Engels, Rutger
[8
]
Kleinjan, Marloes
[2
,9
]
机构:
[1] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Trimbos Inst, Epidemiol & Res Support, Da Costakade 45, NL-3521 VS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Interdisciplinary Social Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Drugs Monitoring & Policy, Trimbos Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Social & Behav Sci, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Pluryn, Res & Dev, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Arizona State Univ, ASU REACH Inst, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ USA
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dev Psychopathol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[8] Erasmus Univ, Execut Board, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[9] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Youth, Trimbos Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词:
Systematic review;
Smoking cessation;
Parents;
Second-hand smoking;
Meta-analysis;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL;
QUIT SMOKING;
MATERNAL SMOKING;
ANTISMOKING SOCIALIZATION;
POSTPARTUM WOMEN;
SECONDHAND SMOKE;
YOUNG-CHILDREN;
EXPOSURE;
PREVENTION;
FATHERS;
D O I:
10.1159/000511145
中图分类号:
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Introduction:A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions tailored to parents of children aged 0-18 years. Methods: A systematic search was carried out in PsycInfo, Embase, and PubMed in March 2020. A manual search of the reference lists of the included studies and systematic reviews related to the topic was also performed. Two authors independently screened the studies based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) effect studies with control groups that examine smoking cessation interventions tailored to parents of children (0-18 years), and (2) full-text original articles written in English and published between January 1990 and February 2020. In total, 18 studies were included in the analyses. The TiDieR checklist and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 were used to extract data and to assess the risk of bias. Consensus among authors was reached at each stage. Results: Random-effects meta-analyses were performed. With a total number of 8,560 parents, the pooled relative risk was 1.62 (95% CI 1.38-1.90; p < 0.00001), showing a modest effect of the interventions on smoking cessation. Overall, 13.1% of the parents in the intervention conditions reported abstinence versus 8.4% of the parents in the control conditions. Discussion/Conclusion: Smoking cessation interventions tailored to parents are modestly effective. To increase the effectiveness and the impact of these interventions in terms of controlling tobacco use and public health, it is crucial for further research to explore how these interventions can be improved.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 293
页数:16
相关论文