The Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Interventions Tailored to Smoking Parents of Children Aged 0-18 Years: A Meta-Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Scheffers-van Schayck, Tessa [1 ,2 ]
Mujcic, Ajla [3 ,4 ]
Otten, Roy [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Engels, Rutger [8 ]
Kleinjan, Marloes [2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Trimbos Inst, Epidemiol & Res Support, Da Costakade 45, NL-3521 VS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Interdisciplinary Social Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Drugs Monitoring & Policy, Trimbos Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Social & Behav Sci, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Pluryn, Res & Dev, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Arizona State Univ, ASU REACH Inst, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ USA
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dev Psychopathol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[8] Erasmus Univ, Execut Board, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[9] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Youth, Trimbos Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Systematic review; Smoking cessation; Parents; Second-hand smoking; Meta-analysis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; QUIT SMOKING; MATERNAL SMOKING; ANTISMOKING SOCIALIZATION; POSTPARTUM WOMEN; SECONDHAND SMOKE; YOUNG-CHILDREN; EXPOSURE; PREVENTION; FATHERS;
D O I
10.1159/000511145
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction:A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions tailored to parents of children aged 0-18 years. Methods: A systematic search was carried out in PsycInfo, Embase, and PubMed in March 2020. A manual search of the reference lists of the included studies and systematic reviews related to the topic was also performed. Two authors independently screened the studies based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) effect studies with control groups that examine smoking cessation interventions tailored to parents of children (0-18 years), and (2) full-text original articles written in English and published between January 1990 and February 2020. In total, 18 studies were included in the analyses. The TiDieR checklist and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 were used to extract data and to assess the risk of bias. Consensus among authors was reached at each stage. Results: Random-effects meta-analyses were performed. With a total number of 8,560 parents, the pooled relative risk was 1.62 (95% CI 1.38-1.90; p < 0.00001), showing a modest effect of the interventions on smoking cessation. Overall, 13.1% of the parents in the intervention conditions reported abstinence versus 8.4% of the parents in the control conditions. Discussion/Conclusion: Smoking cessation interventions tailored to parents are modestly effective. To increase the effectiveness and the impact of these interventions in terms of controlling tobacco use and public health, it is crucial for further research to explore how these interventions can be improved.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 293
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Variability and effectiveness of comparator group interventions in smoking cessation trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Black, Nicola
    Eisma, Maarten C.
    Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
    Johnston, Marie
    West, Robert
    Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie
    Michie, Susan
    de Bruin, Marijn
    ADDICTION, 2020, 115 (09) : 1607 - 1617
  • [22] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of behavioural smoking cessation interventions in selected disadvantaged groups
    Bryant, Jamie
    Bonevski, Billie
    Paul, Chris
    McElduff, Patrick
    Attia, John
    ADDICTION, 2011, 106 (09) : 1568 - 1585
  • [23] Variability and effectiveness of control group interventions in smoking cessation trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Black, Nicola
    Eisma, Maarten C.
    Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
    Johnston, Marie
    West, Robert
    Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie
    Michie, Susan
    de Bruin, Marijn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 1) : S48 - S49
  • [24] The trend of lead poisoning rate in Chinese population aged 0-18 years old: a meta-analysis
    Li, Min-ming
    Cao, Jia
    Gao, Zhen-yan
    Shen, Xiao-ming
    Yan, Chong-huai
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 15
  • [25] Effects of interventions on smoking cessation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Li, Ying
    Gao, Lei
    Chao, Yaqing
    Wang, Jianhua
    Qin, Tianci
    Zhou, Xiaohua
    Chen, Xiaoan
    Hou, Lingyu
    Lu, Linlin
    ADDICTION BIOLOGY, 2024, 29 (03)
  • [26] Smoking Cessation Interventions for Patients with Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gierisch, Jennifer M.
    Bastian, Lori A.
    Calhoun, Patrick S.
    McDuffie, Jennifer R.
    Williams, John W.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (03) : 351 - 360
  • [27] Smoking cessation interventions in COPD: a network meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Strassmann, R.
    Bausch, B.
    Spaar, A.
    Keijnen, J.
    Braendli, O.
    Puhan, M. A.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2009, 34 (03) : 634 - 640
  • [28] Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mottillo, Salvatore
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Belisle, Patrick
    Joseph, Lawrence
    Gervais, Andre
    O'Loughlin, Jennifer
    Paradis, Gilles
    Pihl, Robert
    Pilote, Louise
    Rinfret, Stephane
    Tremblay, Michele
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (06) : 718 - 730
  • [29] Smoking-Cessation Interventions in Appalachia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gupta, Shalika
    Scheuter, Claudia
    Kundu, Arti
    Bhat, Naina
    Cohen, Alasdair
    Facente, Shelley N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 58 (02) : 261 - 269
  • [30] Ecological momentary interventions for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Eghdami, Shayan
    Ahmadkhaniha, Hamid R.
    Baradaran, Hamid R.
    Hirbod-Mobarakeh, Armin
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 58 (10) : 1431 - 1445