Fentanyl Sublingual Tablets Versus Subcutaneous Morphine for the Management of Severe Cancer Pain Episodes in Patients Receiving Opioid Treatment: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial

被引:18
|
作者
Zecca, Ernesto [1 ]
Brunelli, Cinzia [1 ,2 ]
Centurioni, Fabio [1 ]
Manzoni, Andrea [1 ]
Pigni, Alessandra [1 ]
Caraceni, Augusto [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Milan, Italy
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
BREAKTHROUGH PAIN; ORAL MORPHINE; TRANSMUCOSAL FENTANYL; INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; BUCCAL TABLET; PHARMACOKINETICS; EFFICACY; REGIMEN; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9504
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Fentanyl sublingual tablets (FST) are a potentially useful alternative to parenteral opioids such as subcutaneous morphine (SCM) to treat severe cancer pain episodes. No direct comparison between FST and SCM is available. The aim of this study was to test noninferiority of FST versus SCM during the first 30 min postadministration. Methods Patients receiving stable opioid therapy and experiencing a severe pain episode were randomly assigned to either 100 mg FST or 5 mg SCM in a double-blind, double-dummy trial. Average pain intensity (PI) assessed on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale at 10, 20, and 30 min postadministration was the main end point. Analysis of covariance, adjusted by baseline PI, was the main analysis. The noninferiority margin (NIm) for the between-group difference was set at 20.6, that is, equal to one third of the minimum clinically important PI difference of two points. Results A total of 114 patients were randomly assigned to either FST (n = 58) or SCM (n = 56). One patient (in the FST group) withdrew consent before drug administration and was excluded from analysis. Baseline mean PIs were 7.5 in both groups; mean average PIs assessed at 10, 20, and 30 min postadministration were 5.0 and 4.5 for FST and SCM, respectively, with the 95% CI of the between-group difference including the NIm (-0.49; 95% CI, -1.10 to 0.09). Patients taking FST received a second drug dose after 30 min more frequently than did patients taking SCM (51% v 37%, respectively; risk difference, -13%; 95% CI, -30% to 3%). Both treatments were well tolerated, with average follow-up adverse event scores below the response of "A Little." Ninety-three percent of patients preferred the sublingual administration. Conclusion This trial did not show noninferiority of FST versus SCM within the chosen NIm. Both treatments were safe, and patients preferred the sublingual route of administration. FST provides analgesia with modest to moderate increased risk of lower efficacy compared with SCM. (C) 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:759 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of Prophylactic Subcutaneous Fentanyl on Exercise-Induced Breakthrough Dyspnea in Cancer Patients: A Preliminary Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Hui, David
    Xu, Angela
    Frisbee-Hume, Susan
    Chisholm, Gary
    Morgado, Margarita
    Reddy, Suresh
    Bruera, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2014, 47 (02) : 209 - 217
  • [32] The effect of gabapentin versus intrathecal fentanyl on postoperative pain and morphine consumption in cesarean delivery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    Abdolreza Najafi Anaraki
    Kamran Mirzaei
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2014, 290 : 47 - 52
  • [34] Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Oral Methylnaltrexone for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain
    Rauck, Richard
    Slatkin, Neal E.
    Stambler, Nancy
    Harper, Joseph R.
    Israel, Robert J.
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2017, 17 (06) : 820 - 828
  • [35] A double-blind, randomized trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the management of chronic low back pain
    Skljarevski, V.
    Ossanna, M.
    Liu-Seifert, H.
    Zhang, Q.
    Chappell, A.
    Iyengar, S.
    Detke, M.
    Backonja, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 (09) : 1041 - 1048
  • [36] The treatment of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain in China: a double-blind randomized trial of duloxetine versus placebo
    Gao, Yan
    Guo, Xiaohui
    Han, Ping
    Li, Quanmin
    Yang, Gangyi
    Qu, Shen
    Yue, Li
    Wang, Chia-Ning
    Skljarevski, Vladimir
    Duenas, Hector
    Raskin, Joel
    Gu, Liqun
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2014, 30 : 30 - 31
  • [37] Ketamine Mouthwash Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Severe Oral Mucositis Pain in Children With Cancer: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Prakash, S.
    Meena, J. P.
    Gupta, A.
    Bakhshi, S.
    Velpandian, T.
    Pandey, R. M.
    Seth, R.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2020, 67 : S212 - S212
  • [38] Ketamine mouthwash versus placebo in the treatment of severe oral mucositis pain in children with cancer: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Prakash, Satya
    Meena, Jagdish Prasad
    Gupta, Aditya Kumar
    Bakhshi, Sameer
    Velpandian, Thirumurthy
    Pandey, R. M.
    Seth, Rachna
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2020, 67 (09)
  • [39] Sublingual ketorolac versus sublingual tramadol for moderate to severe post-traumatic bone pain in children: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial
    Neri, Elena
    Maestro, Alessandra
    Minen, Federico
    Montico, Marcella
    Ronfani, Luca
    Zanon, Davide
    Favret, Anna
    Messi, Gianni
    Barbi, Egidio
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2013, 98 (09) : 721 - 724
  • [40] Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Hashemi, Masoud
    Zali, Alireza
    Golmakani, Ebrahim
    Delshad, Mohammad Hossein
    Shadnoush, Mahdi
    Akbari, Mohammad-Esmaeil
    DARU-JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 29 (01) : 51 - 59