Fentanyl Sublingual Tablets Versus Subcutaneous Morphine for the Management of Severe Cancer Pain Episodes in Patients Receiving Opioid Treatment: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial

被引:18
|
作者
Zecca, Ernesto [1 ]
Brunelli, Cinzia [1 ,2 ]
Centurioni, Fabio [1 ]
Manzoni, Andrea [1 ]
Pigni, Alessandra [1 ]
Caraceni, Augusto [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Milan, Italy
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
BREAKTHROUGH PAIN; ORAL MORPHINE; TRANSMUCOSAL FENTANYL; INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; BUCCAL TABLET; PHARMACOKINETICS; EFFICACY; REGIMEN; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9504
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Fentanyl sublingual tablets (FST) are a potentially useful alternative to parenteral opioids such as subcutaneous morphine (SCM) to treat severe cancer pain episodes. No direct comparison between FST and SCM is available. The aim of this study was to test noninferiority of FST versus SCM during the first 30 min postadministration. Methods Patients receiving stable opioid therapy and experiencing a severe pain episode were randomly assigned to either 100 mg FST or 5 mg SCM in a double-blind, double-dummy trial. Average pain intensity (PI) assessed on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale at 10, 20, and 30 min postadministration was the main end point. Analysis of covariance, adjusted by baseline PI, was the main analysis. The noninferiority margin (NIm) for the between-group difference was set at 20.6, that is, equal to one third of the minimum clinically important PI difference of two points. Results A total of 114 patients were randomly assigned to either FST (n = 58) or SCM (n = 56). One patient (in the FST group) withdrew consent before drug administration and was excluded from analysis. Baseline mean PIs were 7.5 in both groups; mean average PIs assessed at 10, 20, and 30 min postadministration were 5.0 and 4.5 for FST and SCM, respectively, with the 95% CI of the between-group difference including the NIm (-0.49; 95% CI, -1.10 to 0.09). Patients taking FST received a second drug dose after 30 min more frequently than did patients taking SCM (51% v 37%, respectively; risk difference, -13%; 95% CI, -30% to 3%). Both treatments were well tolerated, with average follow-up adverse event scores below the response of "A Little." Ninety-three percent of patients preferred the sublingual administration. Conclusion This trial did not show noninferiority of FST versus SCM within the chosen NIm. Both treatments were safe, and patients preferred the sublingual route of administration. FST provides analgesia with modest to moderate increased risk of lower efficacy compared with SCM. (C) 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:759 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Epidural and subcutaneous morphine in the management of cancer pain: A double-blind cross-over study
    Kalso, E
    Heiskanen, T
    Rantio, M
    Rosenberg, PH
    Vainio, A
    PAIN, 1996, 67 (2-3) : 443 - 449
  • [22] Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs versus tramadol in pain management following transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial
    Guo, Xiaopeng
    Wang, Zihao
    Gao, Lu
    Ma, Wenbin
    Xing, Bing
    Lian, Wei
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 137 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [23] Authors' Response to: Prophylactic Fentanyl Sublingual Spray for Episodic Exertional Dyspnea in Cancer Patients: A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Hui, David
    Bruera, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 58 (04) : E17 - E18
  • [24] A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF EPIDURAL FENTANYL INFUSION VERSUS PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA WITH MORPHINE FOR POSTTHORACOTOMY PAIN
    BENZON, HT
    WONG, HY
    BELAVIC, AM
    GOODMAN, I
    MITCHELL, D
    LEFHEIT, T
    LOCICERO, J
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1993, 76 (02): : 316 - 322
  • [25] Meropenem versus ceftazidime in the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: A randomized, double-blind trial
    Feld, R
    DePauw, B
    Berman, S
    Keating, A
    Ho, W
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (21) : 3690 - 3698
  • [26] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Fentanyl Buccal Tablets for Breakthrough Pain: Efficacy and Safety in Japanese Cancer Patients
    Kosugi, Toshifumi
    Hamada, Sasagu
    Takigawa, Chizuko
    Shinozaki, Katsunori
    Kunikane, Hiroshi
    Goto, Fumio
    Tanda, Shigeru
    Shima, Yasuo
    Yomiya, Kinomi
    Matoba, Motohiro
    Adachi, Isamu
    Yoshimoto, Tetsusuke
    Eguchi, Kenji
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2014, 47 (06) : 990 - 1000
  • [27] DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ALTEPLASE VERSUS PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH CHEST PAIN AT REST
    ROBERTS, MJD
    MCNEILL, AJ
    DALZELL, GWN
    WILSON, CM
    WEBB, SW
    KHAN, MM
    PATTERSON, GC
    ADGEY, AAJ
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (11) : 1536 - 1542
  • [28] Efficacy and Safety of Low Dose Subcutaneous Diclofenac in the Management of Acute Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial
    Dietrich, Thomas
    Leeson, Rachel
    Gugliotta, Barbara
    Petersen, Birte
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2014, 14 (04) : 315 - 323
  • [29] TREATMENT OF CANCER PAIN WITH MORPHINE - A DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY OF EPIDURAL VERSUS INTRAMUSCULAR ROUTES OF ADMINISTRATION
    NATH, S
    REIZ, GE
    REIZ, S
    ANAESTHESIST, 1988, 37 (10): : 113 - 113
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of fentanyl inhalant for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Lin, Rongbo
    Song, Binbin
    Li, Na
    Rong, Biaoxue
    Bai, Jinghui
    Liu, Yong
    Wang, Wei
    Liu, Anwen
    Luo, Suxia
    Liu, Bo
    Cheng, Peng
    Wu, Yani
    Li, Yujie
    Yu, Xiaohui
    Liu, Xueying
    Dai, Xiangrong
    Li, Xiaoyi
    Liu, Dongying
    Wang, Jian
    Huang, Yan
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 23 (01):