Fentanyl Sublingual Tablets Versus Subcutaneous Morphine for the Management of Severe Cancer Pain Episodes in Patients Receiving Opioid Treatment: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial

被引:18
|
作者
Zecca, Ernesto [1 ]
Brunelli, Cinzia [1 ,2 ]
Centurioni, Fabio [1 ]
Manzoni, Andrea [1 ]
Pigni, Alessandra [1 ]
Caraceni, Augusto [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Milan, Italy
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
BREAKTHROUGH PAIN; ORAL MORPHINE; TRANSMUCOSAL FENTANYL; INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; BUCCAL TABLET; PHARMACOKINETICS; EFFICACY; REGIMEN; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9504
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Fentanyl sublingual tablets (FST) are a potentially useful alternative to parenteral opioids such as subcutaneous morphine (SCM) to treat severe cancer pain episodes. No direct comparison between FST and SCM is available. The aim of this study was to test noninferiority of FST versus SCM during the first 30 min postadministration. Methods Patients receiving stable opioid therapy and experiencing a severe pain episode were randomly assigned to either 100 mg FST or 5 mg SCM in a double-blind, double-dummy trial. Average pain intensity (PI) assessed on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale at 10, 20, and 30 min postadministration was the main end point. Analysis of covariance, adjusted by baseline PI, was the main analysis. The noninferiority margin (NIm) for the between-group difference was set at 20.6, that is, equal to one third of the minimum clinically important PI difference of two points. Results A total of 114 patients were randomly assigned to either FST (n = 58) or SCM (n = 56). One patient (in the FST group) withdrew consent before drug administration and was excluded from analysis. Baseline mean PIs were 7.5 in both groups; mean average PIs assessed at 10, 20, and 30 min postadministration were 5.0 and 4.5 for FST and SCM, respectively, with the 95% CI of the between-group difference including the NIm (-0.49; 95% CI, -1.10 to 0.09). Patients taking FST received a second drug dose after 30 min more frequently than did patients taking SCM (51% v 37%, respectively; risk difference, -13%; 95% CI, -30% to 3%). Both treatments were well tolerated, with average follow-up adverse event scores below the response of "A Little." Ninety-three percent of patients preferred the sublingual administration. Conclusion This trial did not show noninferiority of FST versus SCM within the chosen NIm. Both treatments were safe, and patients preferred the sublingual route of administration. FST provides analgesia with modest to moderate increased risk of lower efficacy compared with SCM. (C) 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:759 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Opioid Exposure on Efficacy and Tolerability of Sublingual Fentanyl and Subcutaneous Morphine for Severe Cancer Pain Episodes. Secondary Analysis From a Double-Blind Double-Dummy, Randomized Trial
    Ricchini, Francesca
    Caraceni, Augusto
    Zecca, Ernesto
    Pigni, Alessandra
    Centurioni, Fabio
    Manzoni, Andrea
    Kaasa, Stein
    Brunelli, Cinzia
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 58 (04) : 587 - 595
  • [2] Patient Controlled Subcutaneous Analgesia of Hydromorphone Versus Morphine to Treat Moderate and Severe Cancer Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial
    Zeng, Xianzheng
    Zhu, Jiang
    Li, Jun
    Chen, Chan
    Sang, Ling
    Liu, Maotong
    Song, Li
    Liu, Hui
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2024, 67 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [3] Efficacy of reconstituted intravenous fentanyl to sublingual solution versus oral morphine syrup for breakthrough pain among patients with chronic gynecologic cancer pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Thantiprechapong, Thitirath
    Tilagul, Thanvarat
    Vasikasin, Vasin
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (07) : 1815 - 1820
  • [4] Sublingual Buprenorphine in Acute Pain Management: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Jalili, Mohammad
    Fathi, Marzieh
    Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar
    Zehtabchi, Shahriar
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 59 (04) : 276 - 280
  • [5] Epidural and subcutaneous morphine in the management of cancer pain - A double-blind crossover study
    Kalso, E
    Heiskanen, T
    Rantio, M
    Rosenberg, PH
    Vainio, A
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 1996, 12 (03) : 64 - 64
  • [6] Intranasal ketamine versus intravenous morphine for pain management in patients with renal colic: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Mahboub Pouraghaei
    Payman Moharamzadeh
    Seyed Pouya Paknezhad
    Zahra Vand Rajabpour
    Hassan Soleimanpour
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1263 - 1267
  • [7] Intranasal ketamine versus intravenous morphine for pain management in patients with renal colic: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Pouraghaei, Mahboub
    Moharamzadeh, Payman
    Paknezhad, Seyed Pouya
    Rajabpour, Zahra Vand
    Soleimanpour, Hassan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (04) : 1263 - 1267
  • [8] CONTROLLED RELEASE MORPHINE TABLETS - A DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CANCER
    HANKS, GW
    TWYCROSS, RG
    BLISS, JM
    ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 42 (08) : 840 - 844
  • [9] Treatment of opioid dependence with buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual tablets: A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Wang, XuYi
    Jiang, Haifeng
    Zhao, Min
    Li, Jing
    Gray, Frank
    Sheng, Lixia
    Li, Yi
    Li, Xiaodong
    Ling, Walter
    Li, Wei
    Hao, Wei
    ASIA-PACIFIC PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [10] Methadone versus morphine as a first-line strong opioid for cancer pain: A randomized, double-blind study
    Bruera, E
    Palmer, JL
    Bosnjak, S
    Rico, MA
    Moyano, J
    Sweeney, C
    Strasser, F
    Willey, J
    Bertolino, M
    Mathias, C
    Spruyt, O
    Fisch, MJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (01) : 185 - 192