Causal inference with a quantitative exposure

被引:21
|
作者
Zhang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Zhou, Jie [1 ]
Cao, Weihua [1 ]
Zhang, Jun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Biostat, Off Surveillance & Biometr, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Silver Spring, MD USA
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, MOE, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Dose-response relationship; double robustness; inverse probability weighting; outcome regression; propensity function; propensity score; stratification; DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; BODY-COMPOSITION; MODELS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0962280212452333
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The current statistical literature on causal inference is mostly concerned with binary or categorical exposures, even though exposures of a quantitative nature are frequently encountered in epidemiologic research. In this article, we review the available methods for estimating the dose-response curve for a quantitative exposure, which include ordinary regression based on an outcome regression model, inverse propensity weighting and stratification based on a propensity function model, and an augmented inverse propensity weighting method that is doubly robust with respect to the two models. We note that an outcome regression model often imposes an implicit constraint on the dose-response curve, and propose a flexible modeling strategy that avoids constraining the dose-response curve. We also propose two new methods: a weighted regression method that combines ordinary regression with inverse propensity weighting and a stratified regression method that combines ordinary regression with stratification. The proposed methods are similar to the augmented inverse propensity weighting method in the sense of double robustness, but easier to implement and more generally applicable. The methods are illustrated with an obstetric example and compared in simulation studies.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 335
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficient Nonparametric Causal Inference with Missing Exposure Information
    Kennedy, Edward H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2020, 16 (01):
  • [2] Contemporary Quantitative Methods and "Slow'' Causal Inference: Response to Palinkas
    Stone, Susan
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2014, 24 (05) : 552 - 555
  • [3] Causality and Causal Inference in Social Work: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives
    Palinkas, Lawrence A.
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2014, 24 (05) : 540 - 547
  • [4] Modeling networks for prediction and causal inference in quantitative genetics and genomics
    Rosa, G. J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 17 - 17
  • [5] Causal inference with misspecified exposure mappings: separating definitions and assumptions
    Savje, F.
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 2024, 111 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [6] Causal Inference
    Kuang, Kun
    Li, Lian
    Geng, Zhi
    Xu, Lei
    Zhang, Kun
    Liao, Beishui
    Huang, Huaxin
    Ding, Peng
    Miao, Wang
    Jiang, Zhichao
    [J]. ENGINEERING, 2020, 6 (03) : 253 - 263
  • [7] CAUSAL INFERENCE
    ROTHMAN, KJ
    LANES, S
    ROBINS, J
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 4 (06) : 555 - 556
  • [8] Commentary: The formal approach to quantitative causal inference in epidemiology: misguided or misrepresented?
    Daniel, Rhian M.
    De Stavola, Bianca L.
    Vansteelandt, Stijn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (06) : 1817 - 1829
  • [9] Causal inference with missing exposure information: Methods and applications to an obstetric study
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    Liu, Wei
    Zhang, Bo
    Tang, Li
    Zhang, Jun
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (05) : 2053 - 2066
  • [10] Rejoinder: Causal inference with misspecified exposure mappings: separating definitions and assumptions
    Saevje, F.
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 2024, 111 (01)