Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction

被引:13
|
作者
Fukunishi, Yoshifumi [1 ]
Yamasaki, Satoshi [2 ]
Yasumatsu, Isao [2 ,3 ]
Takeuchi, Koh [1 ]
Kurosawa, Takashi [2 ,4 ]
Nakamura, Haruki [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, Mol Profiling Res Ctr Drug Discovery Molprof, Koto Ku, 2-3-26 Aomi, Tokyo 1350064, Japan
[2] Technol Res Assoc Next Generat Nat Prod Chem, Koto Ku, 2-3-26 Aomi, Tokyo 1350064, Japan
[3] Daiichi Sankyo RD Novare Co Ltd, Edogawa Ku, 1-16-13 Kita Kasai, Tokyo 1348630, Japan
[4] Hitachi Solut East Japan, Kawasaki Ku, 12-1 Ekimaehoncho, Kanagawa 2100007, Japan
[5] Osaka Univ, Inst Prot Res, 3-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
Binding free energy; ChEMBL; Docking score; Protein-compound docking; DRUG; INHIBITOR; PREDICTION; FEATURES; DATABASE; FINGERPRINTS; LIGANDS; MATRIX; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1002/minf.201600013
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
In order to improve docking score correction, we developed several structure-based quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models by protein-drug docking simulations and applied these models to public affinity data. The prediction models used descriptor-based regression, and the compound descriptor was a set of docking scores against multiple (similar to 600) proteins including nontargets. The binding free energy that corresponded to the docking score was approximated by a weighted average of docking scores for multiple proteins, and we tried linear, weighted linear and polynomial regression models considering the compound similarities. In addition, we tried a combination of these regression models for individual data sets such as IC50, K-i, and %inhibition values. The cross-validation results showed that the weighted linear model was more accurate than the simple linear regression model. Thus, the QSAR approaches based on the affinity data of public databases should improve docking scores.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predicting in-vitro permeability of antimycotics using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models.
    Mills, D
    Basak, SC
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 229 : U207 - U207
  • [32] Predicting in-vitro permeability of antimycotics using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models.
    Mills, D
    Basak, SC
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 229 : U201 - U201
  • [33] Applying quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to extend the mixture toxicity prediction of scrubber water
    Lunde Hermansson, A.
    Gustavsson, M.
    Hassellöv, I.-M.
    Svedberg, P.
    García-Gómez, E.
    Gros, M.
    Petrović, M.
    Ytreberg, E.
    [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2025, 366
  • [34] Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship Models of Monomer Reactivity
    禹新良
    易翔
    杨辉琼
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2019, 38 (11) : 1867 - 1873
  • [35] Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for bee toxicity
    Toropov, Andrey A.
    Toropova, Alla P.
    Como, Francesca
    Benfenati, Emilio
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 99 (7-8): : 1117 - 1128
  • [36] Advances in quantitative structure-activity relationship models of antimalarials
    Roy, Kunal
    Ojha, Probir Kumar
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2010, 5 (08) : 751 - 778
  • [37] Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship Models of Monomer Reactivity
    Yu Xin-Liang
    Yi Xiang
    Yang Hui-Qiong
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 38 (11) : 1867 - 1873
  • [38] Advances in quantitative structure-activity relationship models of antioxidants
    Roy, Kunal
    Mitra, Indrani
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2009, 4 (11) : 1157 - 1175
  • [39] On the interpretation and interpretability of quantitative structure-activity relationship models
    Guha, Rajarshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2008, 22 (12) : 857 - 871
  • [40] Synthesis, antimuscarinic activity and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) of tropinyl and piperidinyl esters
    Xu, R
    Sim, MK
    Go, ML
    [J]. CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 46 (02) : 231 - 241