Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship Models of Monomer Reactivity

被引:0
|
作者
Yu Xin-Liang [1 ]
Yi Xiang [1 ]
Yang Hui-Qiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Inst Engn, Hunan Prov Key Lab Environm Catalysis & Waste Reg, Coll Chem & Chem Engn, Xiangtan 411104, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
density functional theory; molecular descriptors; multiple linear regression; quantum chemical descriptors; quantitative structure-activity relationship; Q-E PARAMETERS; BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION; DERIVATIVES; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.14102/j.cnki.0254-5861.2011-2337
中图分类号
O61 [无机化学];
学科分类号
070301 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The reactivity parameters, Q and e, in the Q-e scheme reflect the reactivities of a monomer (or a radical) in free-radical copolymerizations. By applying multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis, the optimal quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model for the reactivity parameter lnQ was developed based on five descriptors (N-AF, N-OF, E-alpha LUMO, E-beta HOMO, and E-beta LUMO) and 69 monomers with the root mean square (rms) error of 0.61. The optimal MLR model of the parameter e obtained from five descriptors (T-Ocl, N-pN, N-SO, E-alpha HOMO and D-H) and 68 monomers produced rms error of 0.42. Compared with previous models, the two optimal MLR models in this paper show satisfactory statistical characteristics. The feasibility of combining 2D descriptors obtained from the monomers and 3D descriptors calculated from the radical structures (formed from monomers + H center dot) to predict parameters Q and e has been demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:1867 / 1873
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship Models of Monomer Reactivity
    禹新良
    易翔
    杨辉琼
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2019, 38 (11) : 1867 - 1873
  • [2] Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for compounds with anticonvulsant activity
    Bellera, Carolina L.
    Talevi, Alan
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2019, 14 (07) : 653 - 665
  • [3] Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for bee toxicity
    Toropov, Andrey A.
    Toropova, Alla P.
    Como, Francesca
    Benfenati, Emilio
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 99 (7-8): : 1117 - 1128
  • [4] Advances in quantitative structure-activity relationship models of antimalarials
    Roy, Kunal
    Ojha, Probir Kumar
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2010, 5 (08) : 751 - 778
  • [5] Advances in quantitative structure-activity relationship models of antioxidants
    Roy, Kunal
    Mitra, Indrani
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2009, 4 (11) : 1157 - 1175
  • [6] On the interpretation and interpretability of quantitative structure-activity relationship models
    Guha, Rajarshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2008, 22 (12) : 857 - 871
  • [7] Classical models of quantitative structure-activity relationship studies.
    Gaudio, AC
    [J]. QUIMICA NOVA, 1996, 19 (03): : 278 - 289
  • [8] Assessment and Reproducibility of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models by the Nonexpert
    Patel, Mukesh
    Chilton, Martr L.
    Sartini, Andrea
    Gibson, Laura
    Barber, Chris
    Covey-Crump, Liz
    Przybylak, Katarzyna R.
    Cronin, Mark T. D.
    Madden, Judith C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2018, 58 (03) : 673 - 682
  • [9] Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models for Ready Biodegradability of Chemicals
    Mansouri, Kamel
    Ringsted, Tine
    Ballabio, Davide
    Todeschini, Roberto
    Consonni, Viviana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2013, 53 (04) : 867 - 878
  • [10] Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models That Stand the Test of Time
    Davis, Andrew M.
    Wood, David J.
    [J]. MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS, 2013, 10 (04) : 1183 - 1190