Examining the heterogeneity of treatment patterns in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among children and adolescents in the Texas Medicaid population: modeling suboptimal treatment response

被引:1
|
作者
Grebla, Regina [1 ]
Setyawan, Juliana [1 ]
Park, Chanhyun [2 ]
Richards, Kristin M. [2 ]
Nwokeji, Esmond D. [2 ]
Pawaskar, Manjiri [1 ]
Erder, M. Haim [1 ]
Lawson, Kenneth A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Shire, Global Outcomes Res & Epidemiol, Lexington, MA USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Pharm, Hlth Outcomes Div, 2409 Univ Ave,Stop A1930, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; ADHD; treatment; precision medicine; personalized medicine; suboptimal response; ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS DATA; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; LISDEXAMFETAMINE; MUTATIONS; STIMULANT; SELECTION; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2019.1606814
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine suboptimal responses (SR) in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among pediatric patients in the Texas Medicaid program receiving osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) or lisdexamfetamine (LDX) and apply an SR prediction model to identify patients most likely to experience an SR to either OROS-MPH or LDX therapies. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Texas Medicaid claims data of ADHD children and adolescents (6-17 years of age) initiating OROS-MPH or LDX. Primary SR endpoints were drug discontinuation, switching, and augmentation 12-months post-ADHD drug initiation. Logistic regression models were developed to predict SR to OROS-MPH and LDX in 1:1 matched groups of children and adolescent cohorts. Results: A total of 3,633 children and 1,611 adolescents were matched for each cohort. SR was observed among more children (76.4% vs 72.3%; p < 0.001) and adolescents (82.7% vs 78.2%; p = 0.002) initiating OROS-MPH compared to LDX. Patient sub-groups with the highest predicted risk of OROS-MPH SR experienced significantly lower observed SR rates (p < 0.05) when initiating LDX (children: 80.6% for OROS-MPH vs 75.8% for LDX; OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60-0.94; adolescents: 87.2% for OROS-MPH vs 80.6% for LDX; OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.41-0.89). For patients with highest predicted SR rates to LDX, observed SR rates were not significantly different between patients initiating LDX or OROS-MPH. Conclusions: This study demonstrated how a personalized medicine approach using administrative claims data can be used to identify sub-groups of child and adolescent ADHD patients with different risks for suboptimal response with OROS-MPH or LDX in a Medicaid population.
引用
收藏
页码:788 / 797
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Health utility scores in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: response to stimulant treatment
    Hodgkins, P.
    Setyawan, J.
    Banaschewski, T.
    Soutullo, C.
    Lecendreux, M.
    Johnson, M.
    Zuddas, A.
    Adeyi, B.
    Squires, L. A.
    Coghill, D. R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 29
  • [42] Treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children with CHD
    Pierick, Alyson R.
    Lynn, Melodie
    McCracken, Courtney M.
    Oster, Matthew E.
    Iannucci, Glen J.
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2021, 31 (06) : 969 - 972
  • [43] PATTERNS OF RESPONSE TO ATOMOXETINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER
    Sobanski, E.
    Ki, S. Lepp M.
    Bushe, C.
    Berggren, L.
    Casillas, M.
    Deberdt, W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 29
  • [44] Piracetam treatment in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
    Pilina, G. S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 14 : 246 - 247
  • [45] Atomoxetine Treatment in Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Wietecha, Linda A.
    Williams, David W.
    Herbert, Michael
    Melmed, Raun D.
    Greenbaum, Michael
    Schuh, Kory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 19 (06) : 719 - 730
  • [46] Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, medication treatment, and substance use patterns among adolescents and young adults
    Upadhyaya, HP
    Rose, K
    Wang, W
    O'Rourke, K
    Sullivan, B
    Deas, D
    Brady, KT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 15 (05) : 799 - 809
  • [47] VARIATION IN TREATMENT PATTERNS AND OUTCOMES IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER ACROSS EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
    Setyawan, J.
    Grebla, R.
    Nam, S.
    Fridman, M.
    Supina, D.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A552 - A552
  • [48] Response to methylphenidate in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and manic symptoms in the multimodal treatment study of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder titration trial
    Galanter, CA
    Carlson, GA
    Jensen, PS
    Greenhill, LL
    Davies, M
    Li, W
    Chuang, SZ
    Elliott, GR
    Arnold, LE
    March, JS
    Hechtman, L
    Pelham, WE
    Swanson, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 13 (02) : 123 - 136
  • [49] The Prevalence of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder among Chinese Children and Adolescents
    Anni Liu
    Yunwen Xu
    Qiong Yan
    Lian Tong
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 8
  • [50] Reboxetine versus methylphenidate in treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder
    Fariba Arabgol
    Leily Panaghi
    Paria Hebrani
    [J]. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2009, 18 : 53 - 59