Examining the heterogeneity of treatment patterns in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among children and adolescents in the Texas Medicaid population: modeling suboptimal treatment response

被引:1
|
作者
Grebla, Regina [1 ]
Setyawan, Juliana [1 ]
Park, Chanhyun [2 ]
Richards, Kristin M. [2 ]
Nwokeji, Esmond D. [2 ]
Pawaskar, Manjiri [1 ]
Erder, M. Haim [1 ]
Lawson, Kenneth A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Shire, Global Outcomes Res & Epidemiol, Lexington, MA USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Pharm, Hlth Outcomes Div, 2409 Univ Ave,Stop A1930, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; ADHD; treatment; precision medicine; personalized medicine; suboptimal response; ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS DATA; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; LISDEXAMFETAMINE; MUTATIONS; STIMULANT; SELECTION; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2019.1606814
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine suboptimal responses (SR) in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among pediatric patients in the Texas Medicaid program receiving osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) or lisdexamfetamine (LDX) and apply an SR prediction model to identify patients most likely to experience an SR to either OROS-MPH or LDX therapies. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Texas Medicaid claims data of ADHD children and adolescents (6-17 years of age) initiating OROS-MPH or LDX. Primary SR endpoints were drug discontinuation, switching, and augmentation 12-months post-ADHD drug initiation. Logistic regression models were developed to predict SR to OROS-MPH and LDX in 1:1 matched groups of children and adolescent cohorts. Results: A total of 3,633 children and 1,611 adolescents were matched for each cohort. SR was observed among more children (76.4% vs 72.3%; p < 0.001) and adolescents (82.7% vs 78.2%; p = 0.002) initiating OROS-MPH compared to LDX. Patient sub-groups with the highest predicted risk of OROS-MPH SR experienced significantly lower observed SR rates (p < 0.05) when initiating LDX (children: 80.6% for OROS-MPH vs 75.8% for LDX; OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60-0.94; adolescents: 87.2% for OROS-MPH vs 80.6% for LDX; OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.41-0.89). For patients with highest predicted SR rates to LDX, observed SR rates were not significantly different between patients initiating LDX or OROS-MPH. Conclusions: This study demonstrated how a personalized medicine approach using administrative claims data can be used to identify sub-groups of child and adolescent ADHD patients with different risks for suboptimal response with OROS-MPH or LDX in a Medicaid population.
引用
收藏
页码:788 / 797
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment patterns among children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the United States - a retrospective claims analysis
    Schein, Jeff
    Childress, Ann
    Adams, Julie
    Gagnon-Sanschagrin, Patrick
    Maitland, Jessica
    Qu, Wendi
    Cloutier, Martin
    Guerin, Annie
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [22] TIME-TO-INITIATION, HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION, AND COSTS OF TREATMENT OF ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER AMONG TEXAS MEDICAID PRESCHOOLERS
    Singh, R. R.
    Lawson, K. A.
    Barner, J. C.
    Richards, K. M.
    Sasane, R.
    Wilson, J. P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A187 - A188
  • [23] Differential Response Profiles in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Treatment With Atomoxetine
    Wietecha, Linda A.
    Wang, Shufang
    Saylor, Keith E.
    Day, Kathleen A.
    Wu, Sheng Hu
    Kelsey, Doug
    [J]. CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2015, 54 (02) : 164 - 173
  • [24] Methylphenidate in the treatment of children and adolescents with bipolar disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder
    Findling, Robert L.
    Short, Elizabeth J.
    McNamara, Nora K.
    Demeter, Christine A.
    Stansbrey, Robert J.
    Gracious, Barbara L.
    Whipkey, Resaca
    Manos, Michael J.
    Calabrese, Joseph R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 46 (11): : 1445 - 1453
  • [25] PERSISTENCE OF STIMULANT TREATMENT IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH ATTENTION-DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER
    Palli, S. R.
    Aparasu, R. R.
    Chen, H.
    Sherer, J. T.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (03) : A200 - A200
  • [26] Atomoxetine:: a new treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents
    Purper-Ouakil, D
    Fourneret, P
    Wohl, M
    Rénéric, JP
    [J]. ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2005, 31 (03): : 337 - 348
  • [27] Efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in the treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents
    Brown, WJ
    Biederman, J
    Spencer, T
    Heiligenstein, J
    Wernicke, J
    Allen, AJ
    Faries, D
    Michelson, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 12 : S411 - S411
  • [28] The medical treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with amphetamines in children and adolescents
    Froelich, Jan
    Banaschewski, Tobias
    Spanagel, Rainer
    Doepfner, Manfred
    Lehmkuhl, Gerd
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KINDER-UND JUGENDPSYCHIATRIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2012, 40 (05): : 287 - 300
  • [29] GUANFACINE EXTENDED RELEASE IN THE TREATMENT OF ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS
    Connor, D. F.
    Rubin, J.
    [J]. DRUGS OF TODAY, 2010, 46 (05) : 299 - 314
  • [30] Efficacy and Safety of Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
    Kohn, Michael R.
    Tsang, Tracey W.
    Clarke, Simon D.
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-PEDIATRICS, 2012, 6 : 95 - 162