Sources and remediation for mercury contamination in aquatic systems - a literature review

被引:606
|
作者
Wang, QR
Kim, D
Dionysiou, DD
Sorial, GA
Timberlake, D
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
关键词
mercury; aquatic systems; remedial; sources; contamination; sediment; capping; dredging; natural attentuation; modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2004.01.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sources of mercury contamination in aquatic systems were studied in a comprehensive literature review. The results show that the most important anthropogenic sources of mercury pollution in aquatic systems are: (1) atmospheric deposition, (2) erosion, (3) urban discharges. (4) agricultural materials, (5) mining, and (6) combustion and industrial discharges. Capping and dredging are two possible remedial approaches to mercury contamination in aquatic systems, and natural attenuation is a passive decontamination alternative. Capping seems to be an economical and effective remedial approach to mercury-contaminated aquatic systems. Dredging is an expensive remedial approach. However, for heavily polluted systems, dredging may be more effective. Natural attenuation, involving little or no cost, is a possible and very economical choice for less contaminated sites. Proper risk assessment is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of remedial and passive decontamination methods as well as their potential adverse environmental effects. Modeling tools have a bright future in the remediation and passive decontamination of mercury contamination in aquatic systems. Existing mercury transport and transformation models were reviewed and compared. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 336
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MERCURY METHYLATION AND PARTITION IN AQUATIC SYSTEMS
    AKAGI, H
    MORTIMER, DC
    MILLER, DR
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 1979, 23 (03) : 372 - 376
  • [32] Remediation of nitrite contamination in ground and surface waters using aquatic macrophytes
    Rawat, S. K.
    Singh, R. K.
    Singh, Rana P.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (01): : 51 - 56
  • [33] Evaluation of Manganese Oxide Amendments for Mercury Remediation in Contaminated Aquatic Sediments
    Seelos, Mark
    Meraz, Edwin Rivas
    Beutel, Marc
    Traina, Samuel J.
    Furhmann, Byran
    Burmistrova, Julia
    Vlassopoulos, Dimitri
    O'Day, Peggy A.
    ACS ES&T ENGINEERING, 2021, 1 (12): : 1688 - 1697
  • [34] MERCURY - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    NIXON, GS
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1981, 151 (08) : 243 - 243
  • [35] MERCURY - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    JONES, DE
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1981, 151 (05) : 145 - 148
  • [36] Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: A review
    Singh, Rachana
    Singh, Samiksha
    Parihar, Parul
    Singh, Vijay Pratap
    Prasad, Sheo Mohan
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2015, 112 : 247 - 270
  • [37] A Review of Centrifugal Testing of Gasoline Contamination and Remediation
    Meegoda, Jay N.
    Hu, Liming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 8 (08) : 3496 - 3513
  • [38] Heavy metal contamination in urban surface sediments: sources, distribution, contamination control, and remediation
    Hanfi, Mohamed Y.
    Mostafa, Mostafa Y. A.
    Zhukovsky, Michael V.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 192 (01)
  • [39] A review of perchlorate contamination: Analysis and remediation strategies
    Fang C.
    Naidu R.
    Chemosphere, 2023, 338
  • [40] Arsenic Contamination in Soil and Sediment in India: Sources, Effects, and Remediation
    Anamika Shrivastava
    Devanita Ghosh
    Ayusman Dash
    Suatapa Bose
    Current Pollution Reports, 2015, 1 : 35 - 46