Sources and remediation for mercury contamination in aquatic systems - a literature review

被引:606
|
作者
Wang, QR
Kim, D
Dionysiou, DD
Sorial, GA
Timberlake, D
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
关键词
mercury; aquatic systems; remedial; sources; contamination; sediment; capping; dredging; natural attentuation; modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2004.01.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sources of mercury contamination in aquatic systems were studied in a comprehensive literature review. The results show that the most important anthropogenic sources of mercury pollution in aquatic systems are: (1) atmospheric deposition, (2) erosion, (3) urban discharges. (4) agricultural materials, (5) mining, and (6) combustion and industrial discharges. Capping and dredging are two possible remedial approaches to mercury contamination in aquatic systems, and natural attenuation is a passive decontamination alternative. Capping seems to be an economical and effective remedial approach to mercury-contaminated aquatic systems. Dredging is an expensive remedial approach. However, for heavily polluted systems, dredging may be more effective. Natural attenuation, involving little or no cost, is a possible and very economical choice for less contaminated sites. Proper risk assessment is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of remedial and passive decontamination methods as well as their potential adverse environmental effects. Modeling tools have a bright future in the remediation and passive decontamination of mercury contamination in aquatic systems. Existing mercury transport and transformation models were reviewed and compared. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 336
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Atmospheric mercury contamination of remote aquatic ecosystems in Canada
    Allan, RJ
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 39 (12) : 173 - 177
  • [22] Mercury modeling to predict contamination and bioaccumulation in aquatic ecosystems
    Braga, MCB
    Shaw, G
    Lester, JN
    REVIEWS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, VOL 164, 2000, 164 : 69 - 92
  • [23] Sources, Risks, and Remediation Technologies of Pollutants in Aquatic Environments
    Liu, Jing
    Feng, Weiying
    Yang, Fang
    WATER, 2024, 16 (11)
  • [24] Microplastics in Aquatic Environments: Sources, Ecotoxicity, Detection & Remediation
    Katare, Yasharth
    Singh, Prashant
    Sankhla, Mahipal Singh
    Singhal, Muskan
    Jadhav, Ekta B.
    Parihar, Kapil
    Nikalje, Bhagyashri T.
    Trpathi, Ashutosh
    Bhardwaj, Leena
    BIOINTERFACE RESEARCH IN APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2022, 12 (03): : 3407 - 3428
  • [25] Environmental mercury contamination in China: Sources and impacts
    Zhang, L.
    Wong, M. H.
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 33 (01) : 108 - 121
  • [26] A concise overview of perchlorate sources, contamination, and remediation techniques
    Sai, Kotabhaargavi
    Soundarajan, Meera
    Selvaraj, Kubera Raj
    Somasundaram, Shivani
    Kumar, Praveen
    Raghunathan, Muthukumar
    BIOREMEDIATION JOURNAL, 2024, 28 (04) : 530 - 540
  • [27] Remediation of mercury contaminated sites - A review
    Wang, Jianxu
    Feng, Xinbin
    Anderson, Christopher W. N.
    Xing, Ying
    Shang, Lihai
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2012, 221 : 1 - 18
  • [28] The Impairment of River Systems by Metal Mine Contamination: A Review Including Remediation Options
    Byrne, P.
    Wood, P. J.
    Reid, I.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 42 (19) : 2017 - 2077
  • [29] Factors determining cyanobacterial success in aquatic systems - a literature review
    Hyenstrand, P
    Blomqvist, P
    Petersson, A
    ADVANCES IN LIMNOLOGY 51: LAKE ERKEN - 50 YEARS OF LIMNOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1998, 51 : 41 - 62
  • [30] Tracing Mercury Contamination Sources in Sediments Using Mercury Isotope Compositions
    Feng, Xinbin
    Foucher, Delphine
    Hintelmann, Holger
    Yan, Haiyu
    He, Tanrong
    Qiu, Guangle
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (09) : 3363 - 3368