Reactor ageing and phase-out policies: global and regional prospects for nuclear power generation

被引:14
|
作者
Carrara, Samuel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Eni Enrico Mattei FEEM, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Renewable & Appropriate Energy Lab RAEL, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Directorate Energy Transport & Climate C, Westerduinweg 3, NL-1755 LE Petten, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Nuclear; Power generation; Climate change mitigation; Integrated assessment models; SYSTEM INTEGRATION; UNCERTAINTY; TECHNOLOGY; FUTURE; ENERGY; WITCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111834
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Nuclear is considered as a valuable option for the decarbonization of power generation, as it is a no-carbon, yet commercially consolidated technology. However, its real prospects are uncertain, especially in the OECD countries. The main aim of this work is to explore the techno-economic implications of policy-relevant scenarios for nuclear power, designed on the actual prospects in the world regions and developed with the Integrated Assessment Model WITCH. The analysis shows that nuclear generation constantly grows over the century, even if in general the nuclear share in the global electricity mix does not significantly change over time. If constraints are applied to nuclear deployment, the contribution of this technology is compensated by renewables (mainly wind and solar PV) and, to a lower extent, by CCS. The policy costs related to nuclear phase-out are moderate, as they are almost completely compensated by innovation and technology benefits in renewables and energy efficiency. Phase-out policies applied only to the OECD regions do not entail any additional policy costs in these regions, while non-OECD regions marginally benefit from lower uranium prices.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of global methyl bromide phase-out on the Sustainability of strawberry industries
    Porter, I. J.
    Mattner, S. W.
    Banks, J.
    Fraser, P.
    [J]. Proceedings of the Vth International Strawberry Symposium, 2006, (708): : 179 - 185
  • [42] Innovation benefits from nuclear phase-out: can they compensate the costs?
    De Cian, Enrica
    Carrara, Samuel
    Tavoni, Massimo
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 123 (3-4) : 637 - 650
  • [43] Innovation benefits from nuclear phase-out: can they compensate the costs?
    Enrica De Cian
    Samuel Carrara
    Massimo Tavoni
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2014, 123 : 637 - 650
  • [44] Effect of Depreciation Method for Long-Term Tangible Assets on Sustainable Management: From a Nuclear Power Generation Cost Perspective under the Nuclear Phase-Out Policy
    Bang, SungSig
    Park, SangYun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [45] With Fresh Election, Japan Veers Away from Nuclear Phase-Out
    Patel, Sonal
    [J]. POWER, 2013, 157 (02) : 9 - +
  • [46] Coal subsidization and nuclear phase-out in a general equilibrium model for Germany
    Welsch, H
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1998, 20 (02) : 203 - 222
  • [47] Belgian blackout? Estimations of the reserve margin during the nuclear phase-out
    Laleman, Ruben
    Albrecht, Johan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 81 : 416 - 426
  • [48] Comparative Assessment of the Global Fate of α- and β-Hexachlorocyclohexane before and after Phase-Out
    Woehrnschimmel, Henry
    Tay, Pascal
    von Waldow, Harald
    Hung, Hayley
    Li, Yi-Fan
    MacLeod, Matthew
    Hungerbuhler, Konrad
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (04) : 2047 - 2054
  • [49] Nuclear decommissioning after the German Nuclear Phase-Out an integrated view on new regulations and nuclear logistics
    Scherwath, Tim
    Wealer, Ben
    Mendelevitch, Roman
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 137
  • [50] Phase-Out: Nuclear Before Coal - Almost Half of Germans Think This Is a Mistake
    Wendler, Nicolas
    [J]. ATW-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUCLEAR POWER, 2019, 64 (04): : 189 - 189