Nuclear decommissioning after the German Nuclear Phase-Out an integrated view on new regulations and nuclear logistics

被引:6
|
作者
Scherwath, Tim [1 ]
Wealer, Ben [1 ,2 ]
Mendelevitch, Roman [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] DIW Berlin, German Inst Econ Res, Mohrenstr 58, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Berlin Univ Technol, Workgrp Econ & Infrastruct Policy WIP, Str 17,Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Nuclear decommissioning; Nuclear dismantling; Financial liability; Nuclear logistics; Stochastic modeling; Regulation; WASTE MANAGEMENT; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111125
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With Germany's nuclear phase-out, 23 reactors need to be dismantled in the near future. Initiated by the difficult financial situation of affected utilities in 2014, a major discourse on ensuring financial liability led to a redistribution of liabilities and finances, with the utilities remaining in charge of dismantling, while liability for interim and final storage now transferred to the public. This paper assesses whether the new regulation is ultimately likely to be to the benefit of the public. It introduces a two-stage stochastic optimization framework encompassing the different dismantling phases, resulting waste flows and storage levels of low- and intermediatelevel waste (LLW and ILW) as well as the associated costs. Results show that storage risk - proclaimed as a major barrier to efficient decommissioning - is not a major driver for the optimal decommissioning schedule. However, a delay of ten years might increase interim storage costs now borne by the public by over 20%. Lacking experience and handling capacity of the industry could significantly shrink the buffer currently included in utility funds in order to deal with dismantling uncertainties. Our analysis reveals the storage gate as the new crucial interface between utilities and the public storage provider.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the Rationality of the German Nuclear Phase-out
    Stoll, Wolfgang
    [J]. ATW-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUCLEAR POWER, 2018, 63 (03): : 178 - +
  • [2] Assessing nuclear phase-out
    Rausch, Sebastian
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 12 (04) : 314 - 315
  • [3] Assessing nuclear phase-out
    Sebastian Rausch
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2022, 12 : 314 - 315
  • [4] The German Nuclear Phase-out Plan and its Impact
    Zhang, Yanli
    Gu, Chunlei
    Ding, Yongjian
    [J]. RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, PTS 1-7, 2012, 347-353 : 1621 - +
  • [5] Nuclear Competencies for Germany - indispensable even after the German Nuclear phase-out Spotlight on Advanced Nuclear Fuels GmbH (Framatome)
    不详
    [J]. ATW-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUCLEAR POWER, 2021, 66 (05): : D3 - D10
  • [6] Nuclear Competencies in Germany - a Legitimate Case Also After the Nuclear Phase-out
    Ohnemus, Joachim
    [J]. ATW-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUCLEAR POWER, 2021, 66 (05): : 38 - 41
  • [7] Nuclear Expertise for Germany - Indispensable Even After the German Nuclear Phase-out Spotlight on Advanced Nuclear Fuels GmbH (Framatome)
    Reimann, Peter
    [J]. ATW-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUCLEAR POWER, 2021, 66 (05): : 34 - 37
  • [8] Swiss reject nuclear phase-out
    不详
    [J]. PHYSICS WORLD, 2017, 30 (01) : 9 - 9
  • [9] Nuclear Phase-out Last Act? Are the New Compensation Regulations for Frustrated Expenses in Accordance with the Constitution?
    Leidinger, Tobias
    [J]. ATW-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUCLEAR POWER, 2018, 63 (8-9): : 440 - +
  • [10] Impact of the German nuclear phase-out on Europe's electricity generation
    Bruninx, Kenneth
    Madzharov, Darin
    Delarue, Erik
    D'haeseleer, William
    [J]. 2012 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET (EEM), 2012,