Overall survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy

被引:98
|
作者
Westin, Shannon N. [1 ]
Rallapalli, Vijayashri [1 ]
Fellman, Bryan [2 ]
Urbauer, Diana L. [2 ]
Pal, Navdeep [1 ]
Frumovitz, Michael M. [1 ]
Ramondetta, Lois M. [1 ]
Bodurka, Diane C. [1 ]
Ramirez, Pedro T. [1 ]
Soliman, Pamela T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Pelvic exenteration; Gynecologic malignancy; Cervical cancer; Endometrial cancer; Vulvar cancer; Overall survival; CERVICAL-CANCER; EXPERIENCE; CISPLATIN; RADIATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.034
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Five-Year survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies has been reported as high as 60%. The objective of this study was to determine overall survival (OS) after pelvic exenteration and evaluate factors impacting outcome. Methods. A retrospective review of all women who underwent pelvic exenteration at our institution between February 1993 and December 2010 was performed. OS was defined as time from exenteration to date of death or last contact. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan Meyer method. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the impact of clinical and pathologic factors on survival outcomes. Results. One hundred sixty patients with gynecologic malignancy underwent pelvic exenteration. Five-year recurrence free survival (RFS) was 33% (95%CI 0.25-0.40). Factors which negatively impacted RFS included shorter treatment-free interval (p = .050), vulvar primary (p = .032), positive margins (p < .001), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, p < .001), positive lymph nodes (p < .001) and perineural invasion (p = 0.030). In multivariate analysis, positive margins (p = .040), positive nodes (p < .001) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, p = .003) retained a significant impact on RFS. Five-year OS was 40% (95% CI 0.32-0.48). Factors which negatively impacted OS included vulvar primary (p = .04), positive margins (p < .001), LVSI (p < .001), posithie lymph nodes (p < .001) and perineural invasion (p = .008). In multivariate analysis, positive nodes (p = .001) and LVSI (p = .001) retained a significant impact on OS. Conclusion. Five-year OS after pelvic exenteration was 40%. Survival outcomes have not significantly improved despite improvements in technique and patient selection. Multiple non-modifiable factors at the time of exenteration are associated with poor survival. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 551
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy: A NSQIP analysis of post-operative morbidity and mortality.
    Sears, Sarah
    Resnick, Kimberly Erin
    Singh, Sareena
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [32] Pelvic Exenteration for Advanced and Recurrent Malignancy
    Zoucas, Evita
    Frederiksen, Sven
    Lydrup, Marie-Louise
    Mansson, Wiking
    Gustafson, Pelle
    Alberius, Per
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 34 (09) : 2177 - 2184
  • [33] Survival after pelvic exenteration for cervical and vaginal cancer
    Baiocchi, G.
    Aguiar, S.
    Begnami, M.
    Lopes, A.
    Guimaraes, G.
    Soares, F.
    Oliveira, R.
    Faloppa, C.
    Kumagai, L.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 : S56 - S56
  • [34] Pelvic Exenteration for Advanced Nonrectal Pelvic Malignancy PelvExCollaborative
    Kelly, M. E.
    Ryan, E. J.
    Aalbers, A. G. J.
    Abdul, Aziz N.
    Abraham-Nordling, M.
    Alberda, W.
    Antoniou, A.
    Austin, K. K.
    Baker, R.
    Bali, M.
    Baseckas, G.
    Bednarski, B. K.
    Beets, G. L.
    Berg, P. L.
    Beynon, J.
    Biondo, S.
    Bordeianou, L.
    Bremers, A. B.
    Brunner, M.
    Buchwald, P.
    Burger, J. W. A.
    Burling, D.
    Campain, N.
    Chan, K. K. L.
    Chang, G. J.
    Chew, M. H.
    Chong, C. P.
    Christensen, H. K.
    Codd, M.
    Colquhoun, A. J.
    Corr, A.
    Coscia, M.
    Coyne, P. E.
    Creavin, B.
    Damjanovic, L.
    Daniels, I. R.
    Davies, M.
    Davies, R. J.
    de wilt, J. H. W.
    Denost, Q.
    Deutsch, C.
    Dietz, D.
    Domingo, S.
    Dozois, E. J.
    Duff, M.
    Eglinton, T.
    Evans, M. D.
    Fearnhead, N. S.
    Frizelle, F. A.
    Garcia-Granero, E.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 270 (05) : 899 - 905
  • [35] Clinical outcomes of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies
    Moolenaar, L. R.
    van Rangelrooij, L. E.
    van Poelgeest, M. I. E.
    van Beurden, M.
    van Driel, W. J.
    van Lonkhuijzen, L. R. C. W.
    Mom, C. H.
    Zaal, A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 171 : 114 - 120
  • [36] Current developments for pelvic exenteration in gynecologic oncology
    Schneider, Achim
    Koehler, Christhardt
    Erdemoglu, Evrim
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 21 (01) : 4 - 9
  • [37] Performance and outcome of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies
    Matsuo, K.
    Mandelbaum, R. S.
    Adams, C. L.
    Roman, L. D.
    Wright, J. D.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 : 190 - 190
  • [38] Palliative pelvic exenteration for patients with gynecologic cancer
    Guimaraes, G. C.
    Baiocchi, G.
    Kumagai, L. Y.
    Rossi, B. M.
    Ferreira, F. O.
    Aguiar, S.
    Faloppa, C. C.
    Lopes, A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (02) : S164 - S165
  • [39] Survival and morbidity outcomes after pelvic exenteration for pelvic sarcoma: an institutional series
    Lee, Peter J.
    Meshkat, Babak
    Sasidharan, Prashanth
    Zahid, Assad
    Coker, David J.
    Solomon, Michael J.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (05) : 1038 - 1043
  • [40] Cost Analysis of Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Malignancy
    Risbey, Charles W. G.
    Brown, Kilian G. M.
    Solomon, Michael
    Mcbride, Kate
    Steffens, Daniel
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (13) : 9079 - 9087