Overall survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy

被引:98
|
作者
Westin, Shannon N. [1 ]
Rallapalli, Vijayashri [1 ]
Fellman, Bryan [2 ]
Urbauer, Diana L. [2 ]
Pal, Navdeep [1 ]
Frumovitz, Michael M. [1 ]
Ramondetta, Lois M. [1 ]
Bodurka, Diane C. [1 ]
Ramirez, Pedro T. [1 ]
Soliman, Pamela T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Pelvic exenteration; Gynecologic malignancy; Cervical cancer; Endometrial cancer; Vulvar cancer; Overall survival; CERVICAL-CANCER; EXPERIENCE; CISPLATIN; RADIATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.034
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Five-Year survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies has been reported as high as 60%. The objective of this study was to determine overall survival (OS) after pelvic exenteration and evaluate factors impacting outcome. Methods. A retrospective review of all women who underwent pelvic exenteration at our institution between February 1993 and December 2010 was performed. OS was defined as time from exenteration to date of death or last contact. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan Meyer method. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the impact of clinical and pathologic factors on survival outcomes. Results. One hundred sixty patients with gynecologic malignancy underwent pelvic exenteration. Five-year recurrence free survival (RFS) was 33% (95%CI 0.25-0.40). Factors which negatively impacted RFS included shorter treatment-free interval (p = .050), vulvar primary (p = .032), positive margins (p < .001), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, p < .001), positive lymph nodes (p < .001) and perineural invasion (p = 0.030). In multivariate analysis, positive margins (p = .040), positive nodes (p < .001) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, p = .003) retained a significant impact on RFS. Five-year OS was 40% (95% CI 0.32-0.48). Factors which negatively impacted OS included vulvar primary (p = .04), positive margins (p < .001), LVSI (p < .001), posithie lymph nodes (p < .001) and perineural invasion (p = .008). In multivariate analysis, positive nodes (p = .001) and LVSI (p = .001) retained a significant impact on OS. Conclusion. Five-year OS after pelvic exenteration was 40%. Survival outcomes have not significantly improved despite improvements in technique and patient selection. Multiple non-modifiable factors at the time of exenteration are associated with poor survival. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 551
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Complications of Urinary Diversion after Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecological Malignancy
    Huang-Kuang Chang
    King-Yik Lo
    Han-Sun Chiang
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2000, 11 : 358 - 360
  • [22] Complications of urinary diversion after pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancy
    Chang, HK
    Lo, KY
    Chiang, HS
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL AND PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION, 2000, 11 (06) : 358 - 360
  • [23] Prospective Assessment of First-Year Quality of Life After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancy: A French Multicentric Study
    A. Martinez
    T. Filleron
    P. Rouanet
    P. Méeus
    E. Lambaudie
    J. M. Classe
    F. Foucher
    F. Narducci
    S. Gouy
    F. Guyon
    F. Marchal
    E. Jouve
    P. E. Colombo
    A. Mourregot
    M. Rivoire
    N. Chopin
    G. Houvenaeghel
    I. Jaffre
    J. Leveque
    V. Lavoue
    E. Leblanc
    P. Morice
    E. Stoeckle
    J. L. Verheaghe
    D. Querleu
    G. Ferron
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 535 - 541
  • [24] Prospective Assessment of First-Year Quality of Life After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancy: A French Multicentric Study
    Martinez, A.
    Filleron, T.
    Rouanet, P.
    Meeus, P.
    Lambaudie, E.
    Classe, J. M.
    Foucher, F.
    Narducci, F.
    Gouy, S.
    Guyon, F.
    Marchal, F.
    Jouve, E.
    Colombo, P. E.
    Mourregot, A.
    Rivoire, M.
    Chopin, N.
    Houvenaeghel, G.
    Jaffre, I.
    Leveque, J.
    Lavoue, V.
    Leblanc, E.
    Morice, P.
    Stoeckle, E.
    Verheaghe, J. L.
    Querleu, D.
    Ferron, G.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (02) : 535 - 541
  • [25] PROSPECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF FIRST YEAR QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER PELVIC EXENTERATION FOR GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCY. A FRENCH MULTICENTRIC STUDY
    Martinez, A.
    Filleron, T.
    Rouanet, P.
    Meeus, P.
    Lambaudie, E.
    Classe, J. M.
    Foucher, F.
    Fabrice, N.
    Sebastien, G.
    Frederic, G.
    Querleu, D.
    Ferron, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 1977 - 1977
  • [26] The influence of surgeon volume on outcomes after pelvic exenteration for a gynecologic cancer
    Jalloul, Randa J.
    Nick, Alpa M.
    Munsell, Mark F.
    Westin, Shannon N.
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (05)
  • [27] Quality of life and its correlates after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic cancer
    Donovan, Kristine A.
    Albizu-Rivera, Alexandra
    Chon, Hye Sook
    Wenham, Robert Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (29)
  • [28] Pelvic exenteration for recurrent colonic malignancy
    B. Griffiths
    D. Harji
    S. Maslekar
    C. Bruce
    P. M. Sagar
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2012, 16 : 401 - 402
  • [29] Pelvic exenteration for recurrent colonic malignancy
    Griffiths, B.
    Harji, D.
    Maslekar, S.
    Bruce, C.
    Sagar, P. M.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2012, 16 (05) : 401 - 402
  • [30] Pelvic Exenteration for Advanced and Recurrent Malignancy
    Evita Zoucas
    Sven Frederiksen
    Marie-Louise Lydrup
    Wiking Månsson
    Pelle Gustafson
    Per Alberius
    World Journal of Surgery, 2010, 34 : 2177 - 2184