A new implant with solid core and porous surface: The biocompatability with bone

被引:13
|
作者
Yang, Xu [1 ]
Wang, Dihua [2 ]
Liang, Youde [1 ]
Yin, Huayi [2 ]
Zhang, Shuang [1 ]
Jiang, Tao [1 ]
Wang, Yining [1 ]
Zhou, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Key Lab Oral Biomed Engn, Minist Educ, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Dept Environm Engn, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Farthing-Fray-Chen (FFC); cambridge process; porous titanium; osteointegration; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOBLAST-LIKE CELLS; GENE-EXPRESSION; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; IN-VITRO; INTEGRATION; OSSEOINTEGRATION; INGROWTH; TOPOGRAPHY; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.a.34906
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This research investigated osteogenic potencies of Farthing-Fray-Chen Titanium (FFcTi) implant with transitional porous-solid structure. The material characteristics, biomechanical property, osteogenic performances were assessed. FFcTi showed similar roughness as sand-blasted and acid etched titanium (SA), but was more hydrophilic than SA and machined commercial pure titanium (MA). Young's modulus of FFcTi implant in compressive tests was 15.8 +/- 6.3 GPa, which was close to bone. In vitro observations manifested excellent spreading abilities of MC3T3-E1 cell on FFcTi and SA. Adhesion rates of MC3T3-E1 cells at 4 h gradually decreased on MA, SA, and FFcTi surfaces (MA>SA, p<0.01; SA>FFcTi, p<0.05), while cell proliferation ability on FFcTi was weaker than MA during 1-6 days (p<0.01) and similar to MA and SA in day 11. ALP activity of cells on FFcTi at 14 day was higher than MA and lower than SA (p<0.01). In a bone defect model of rabbits, BIC and bone volum ratio within 50 m were significantly higher for FFcTi than MA (BIC, p<0.01; BT0.05, p<0.05) while bone volume ratio within 100 and 500 m were of no differences. Micro CT analysis also showed similar results to the histomorphometric data. Thus, we conclude that FFcTi with melting sphere based multiporous structure has a hydrophilic, rough surface, and close modulus to bone. In vitro, its low proliferation and ALP activity promotion were similar to other micro scale roughed surface. In vivo test showed better osteogenesis ability when compared with MA at least in 2 weeks. Thus, this Farthing-Fray-Chen Titanium implant seems to hold considerable potential for bone implant applications. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 102A: 2395-2407, 2014.
引用
收藏
页码:2395 / 2407
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Investigation of the Bone Tissue and Implant Surface Interactions
    Bedzinski, R.
    Krzak-Ros, J.
    Stefanska, M.
    Maruszewski, K.
    STRAIN, 2010, 46 (06) : 518 - 525
  • [22] The smooth surface tunnel porous polyethylene enucleation implant
    Woog, JJ
    Dresner, SC
    Lee, TS
    Kim, YD
    Hartstein, ME
    Shore, JW
    Neuhaus, RW
    Kaltreider, SA
    Migliori, ME
    Mandeville, JTH
    Roh, JH
    Amato, MM
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, 2004, 35 (05): : 358 - 362
  • [23] Novel Minimal Access Bone Anchored Hearing Implant Surgery and a New Surface Modified Titanium Implant, the Birmingham Experience
    Limbrick, Jack
    Muzaffar, Jameel
    Kumar, Raghu
    Mulvihill, Daniel
    Gaskell, Peter
    Addison, Owen
    Monksfield, Peter
    Banga, Rupan
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2019, 40 (10) : 1326 - 1332
  • [24] A NEW DESIGN POROUS COATED ACETABULAR IMPLANT
    COCKSHUTT, JR
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 1985, 14 (01) : 51 - 51
  • [25] New bone formation and trabecular bone microarchitecture of highly porous tantalum compared to titanium implant threads: A pilot canine study
    Lee, Jin Whan
    Wen, Hai Bo
    Gubbi, Prabhu
    Romanos, Georgios E.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (02) : 164 - 174
  • [26] BONE INGROWTH AND MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES OF A POROUS HYDROXYAPATITE IMPLANT
    MARTIN, RB
    CHAPMAN, MW
    SHARKEY, N
    HEITTER, D
    SHORS, E
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1988, 21 (10) : 853 - 853
  • [27] Sliding behavior of zirconia porous implant surfaces against bone
    Dantas, T. A.
    Roedel, S.
    Mesquita-Guimaraes, J.
    Pinto, P.
    Souza, J. C. M.
    Fredel, M. C.
    Silva, F. S.
    Henriques, B.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2019, 107 (04) : 1113 - 1121
  • [28] HUMAN HISTOLOGY OF THE BONE-POROUS METAL IMPLANT INTERFACE
    BOBYN, JD
    ENGH, CA
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1984, 7 (09) : 1410 - 1421
  • [29] A porous swelling copolymeric material for improved implant fixation to bone
    Siegler, Sorin
    Taghvaei, Moein
    Zegarski, Ryan
    Palmese, Giuseppe
    Mathew, Rena
    Schayes, Julia
    Schaer, Thomas
    Najafi, Ahmad
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 111 (07) : 1342 - 1350
  • [30] Porous Bone Increases the Risk of Posterior Mandibular Implant Failure
    Block, Michael S.
    Christensen, Brian J.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 79 (07) : 1459 - 1466