The VGAM Package for Capture-Recapture Data Using the Conditional Likelihood

被引:0
|
作者
Yee, Thomas W. [1 ]
Stoklosa, Jakub [2 ]
Huggins, Richard M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE | 2015年 / 65卷 / 05期
关键词
closed population size estimation; conditional likelihood; mark-capture-recapture; vector generalized additive model; VGAM; NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION; BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSE; AUXILIARY VARIABLES; NATURAL-SELECTION; MODELS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
It is well known that using individual covariate information (such as body weight or gender) to model heterogeneity in capture-recapture (CR) experiments can greatly enhance inferences on the size of a closed population. Since individual covariates are only observable for captured individuals, complex conditional likelihood methods are usually required and these do not constitute a standard generalized linear model (GLM) family. Modern statistical techniques such as generalized additive models (GAMs), which allow a relaxing of the linearity assumptions on the covariates, are readily available for many standard GLM families. Fortunately, a natural statistical framework for maximizing conditional likelihoods is available in the Vector GLM and Vector GAM classes of models. We present several new R functions (implemented within the VGAM package) specifically developed to allow the incorporation of individual covariates in the analysis of closed population CR data using a GLM/GAM-like approach and the conditional likelihood. As a result, a wide variety of practical tools are now readily available in the VGAM object oriented framework. We discuss and demonstrate their advantages, features and flexibility using the new VGAM CR functions on several examples.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1 / 33
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing Coverage of Protein Interaction Data Using Capture-Recapture Models
    Kelly, W. P.
    Stumpf, M. P. H.
    BULLETIN OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 74 (02) : 356 - 374
  • [42] Analysis of Capture-Recapture Models with Individual Covariates Using Data Augmentation
    Royle, J. Andrew
    BIOMETRICS, 2009, 65 (01) : 267 - 274
  • [43] Maximum likelihood inference for the band-read error model for capture-recapture data with misidentification
    Wei Zhang
    Steven J. Price
    Simon J. Bonner
    Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2021, 28 : 405 - 422
  • [44] Modeling dispersal using capture-recapture data: A comparison of dispersal models
    Terui, Akira
    ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 35 (05) : 686 - 699
  • [45] Efficient profile-likelihood confidence intervals for capture-recapture models
    Gimenez, O
    Choquet, R
    Lamor, L
    Scofield, P
    Fletcher, D
    Lebreton, JD
    Pradel, R
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2005, 10 (02) : 184 - 196
  • [46] Using visual encounter data to improve capture-recapture abundance estimates
    Joseph, Maxwell B.
    Knapp, Roland A.
    ECOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (02):
  • [47] Spatial capture-recapture for categorically marked populations with an application to genetic capture-recapture
    Augustine, Ben C.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Murphy, Sean M.
    Chandler, Richard B.
    Cox, John J.
    Kelly, Marcella J.
    ECOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (04):
  • [48] Effects of measurement error and conditional score estimation in capture-recapture models
    Hwang, Wen-Han
    Huang, Steve Y. H.
    Wang, C. Y.
    STATISTICA SINICA, 2007, 17 (01) : 301 - 316
  • [49] A note on identifiability and maximum likelihood estimation for a heterogeneous capture-recapture model
    Moraes Pezzott, George Lucas
    Bueno Salasar, Luis Ernesto
    Leite, Jose Galvao
    Louzada-Neto, Francisco
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2020, 49 (21) : 5273 - 5293
  • [50] Efficient profile-likelihood confidence intervals for capture-recapture models
    Olivier Gimenez
    Rémi Choquet
    Laurent Lamor
    Paul Scofield
    David Fletcher
    Jean-Dominique Lebreton
    Roger Pradel
    Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2005, 10 : 184 - 196