The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with prostate cancer: EORTC QLQ-PR25. Validation study for Spanish patients

被引:14
|
作者
Ignacio Arraras, Juan [1 ,2 ]
Villafranca, Elena [1 ]
Arias de la Vega, Fernando [1 ]
Romero, Pilar [1 ]
Rico, Mikel [1 ]
Vila, Meritxell [1 ]
Asin, Gemma [1 ]
Chicata, Volker [1 ]
Angel Dominguez, Miguel [1 ]
Lainez, Nuria [2 ]
Manterola, Ana [1 ]
Martinez, Enrique [1 ]
Martinez, Maite [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Navarre, Radiotherapeut Oncol Dept, ES-31008 Navarra, Spain
[2] Hosp Navarre, Dept Med Oncol, ES-31008 Navarra, Spain
来源
CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY | 2009年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
Cancer; Prostate; Quality of life; Validation; Spanish; EORTC QLQ-PR25; QLQ-C30; MEN; INSTRUMENT; INDEX; HEAD;
D O I
10.1007/S12094-009-0332-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The EORTC Quality of Life (QL) Group has developed a questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ-PR25, for evaluating QL in prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQPR25 when applied to a sample of Spanish patients. One hundred and thirty-seven prostate cancer patients with localised disease who started radiotherapy with radical intention combined with or without hormonotherapy prospectively completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaires three times: on the first and last day of radiotherapy and in the follow-up period. Psychometric evaluation of the questionnaires' structure, reliability and validity was conducted. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that many of the item-scale correlation coefficients met the standards of convergent and discriminant validity. Exceptions appeared mainly in the scales for bowel symptoms and for hormonal-treatment-related symptoms. Cronbach's coefficients of the scales were good (0.72-0.86) for the urinary symptoms and sexual function scales but they were lower (< 0.70) for the bowel and hormonal treatment scales. Most scales of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 had low to moderate intercorrelations. Correlations between the scales of the QLQ-C30 and the module were generally low. Group comparison analyses showed better QL in patients with higher Performance Status. Changes in QL appeared throughout the measurements. These were in line with the treatment process. The EORTC QLQ-PR25 was a reliable and valid instrument when applied to a sample of Spanish prostate cancer patients. These results are in line with those of the EORTC validation study.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 164
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An international update of the EORTC questionnaire for assessing quality of life in breast cancer patients: EORTC QLQ-BR45
    Bjelic-Radisic, V
    Cardoso, F.
    Cameron, D.
    Brain, E.
    Kuljanic, K.
    da Costa, R. A.
    Conroy, T.
    Inwald, E. C.
    Serpentini, S.
    Pinto, M.
    Weis, J.
    Morag, O.
    Astrup, G. Lindviksmoen
    Tomaszweksi, K. A.
    Pogoda, K.
    Sinai, P.
    Sprangers, M.
    Aaronson, N.
    Velikova, G.
    Greimel, E.
    Arraras, J.
    Bottomley, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 (02) : 283 - 288
  • [22] VALIDATION OF THE PROPOSED REDUCED QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE EORTC QLQ-C30 IN CUBANS PATIENTS WITH CANCER
    Viada, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A651 - A651
  • [23] Development, characteristics and validity of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 and the FACT-P for assessment of quality of life in prostate cancer patients
    Chu, Dominic
    Popovic, Marko
    Chow, Edward
    Cella, David
    Beaumont, Jennifer L.
    Lam, Henry
    Nguyen, Jasmine
    Di Giovanni, Julia
    Pulenzas, Natalie
    Bedard, Gillian
    Bottomley, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2014, 3 (05) : 523 - 531
  • [24] Validation of the EORTC QLQ-BIL21 questionnaire for measuring quality of life in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and cancer of the gallbladder
    S D Kaupp-Roberts
    G Yadegarfar
    E Friend
    C M O'Donnell
    J W Valle
    C Byrne
    I Bahar
    M Finch-Jones
    R Gillmore
    C D Johnson
    S P Pereira
    J K Wiggers
    M Pinto
    B Al-Sarireh
    J K Ramage
    British Journal of Cancer, 2016, 115 : 1032 - 1038
  • [25] Validation of the EORTC QLQ-BIL21 questionnaire for measuring quality of life in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and cancer of the gallbladder
    Kaupp-Roberts, S. D.
    Yadegarfar, G.
    Friend, E.
    O'Donnell, C. M.
    Valle, J. W.
    Byrne, C.
    Bahar, I.
    Finch-Jones, M.
    Gillmore, R.
    Johnson, C. D.
    Pereira, S. P.
    Wiggers, J. K.
    Pinto, M.
    Al-Sarireh, B.
    Ramage, J. K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 115 (09) : 1032 - 1038
  • [26] Information disclosure to cancer patients: EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire
    Ignacio Arraras, Juan
    Greimel, Eva
    Chie, Wei-Chu
    Sezer, Orhan
    Bergenmar, Mia
    Costantini, Anna
    Young, Teresa
    Kuljanic, Karin
    Velikova, Galina
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2011, 11 (03) : 281 - 286
  • [27] Cross-Cultural Application of the Korean Version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients with Prostate Cancer - EORTC QLQ-PR25
    Park, Jinsung
    Shin, Dong Wook
    Yun, Seok Joong
    Park, Sung-Woo
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Kwak, Cheol
    Kwon, Tae Gyun
    Kim, Hyung Jin
    Ahn, Hanjong
    ONCOLOGY, 2013, 85 (05) : 299 - 305
  • [28] Development of a questionnaire (EORTC module) to measure quality of life in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer, the EORTC QLQ-BIL21
    E Friend
    G Yadegarfar
    C Byrne
    C D Johnson
    O Sezer
    S Pucciarelli
    S P Pereira
    W-C Chie
    A Banfield
    J K Ramage
    British Journal of Cancer, 2011, 104 : 587 - 592
  • [29] Update of the EORTC questionnaire for assessing quality of life in patients with lung cancer: Introducing the new EORTC QLQ-LC29
    Koller, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [30] Questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with breast cancer - Validation of the Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-BR 53
    Zhang, Zhen
    Zhang, Xian
    Wei, Ling
    Lin, Yunshou
    Wu, Dongwen
    Xie, Shumin
    Yue, Lin
    Tian, Jingru
    Zhang, Yu
    Song, Qijun
    Woo, Stephenie Mu-Lian
    Miller, Adam R.
    Luo, Le
    Zhang, Lei
    BREAST, 2017, 32 : 87 - 92