Uncertainty Analysis on k-ε Turbulence Model in the Prediction of Subcooled Boiling in Vertical Pipes

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Xiang [1 ]
Xia, Genglei [1 ]
Cong, Tenglong [2 ]
Peng, Minjun [1 ]
Wang, Zhenhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Engn Univ, Fundamental Sci Nucl Safety & Simulat Technol Lab, Harbin, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
subcooled boiling; uncertainty analysis; deterministic sampling method; turbulence model; computational fluid dynamics; FLOW; CFD;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2020.584531
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become an effective method for researching two-phase flow in reactor systems. However, the uncertainty analysis of Computational fluid dynamics simulation is still immature. The effects of uncertainties from two-phase models and boundary conditions have been analyzed in our previous work. In this work, the uncertainties from a turbulence model on the prediction of subcooled boiling flow were analyzed with the DEBORA benchmark experiments by a deterministic sampling method. Seven parameters in the standard k-epsilon model, which interrelated momentum, energy, turbulent kinetic energy, and dissipation rate, were studied as uncertainty sources, including C-mu, C-mu,C-g, C-1 epsilon, C-2 epsilon, sigma(k), sigma(epsilon), and Pr-t. Radial parameters were calculated to study the effects of uncertainties from the turbulence model. The contributions of each uncertainty source on void fraction and liquid temperature were also analyzed. It was found that the models can simulate subcooled boiling flow accurately and uncertainty analysis by deterministic sampling can give a reference interval to increase the reliability of results. The C-2 epsilon and C-1 epsilon, parameters in the production term and dissipation term of transport equations, dominate the radial distributions of void fraction and liquid temperature.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Influence of the wall condition on k-ω turbulence model predictions
    Thivet, F
    Daouk, M
    Knight, DD
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2002, 40 (01) : 179 - 181
  • [42] Resolving the dependence on freestream values for the k-ω turbulence model
    Kok, JC
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2000, 38 (07) : 1292 - 1295
  • [43] Calibration of the Transitional k-ω-γ-Reθt Turbulence Model
    Barrouillet, Benjamin
    Laurendeau, Eric
    Yang, Hong
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (07) : 4140 - 4148
  • [44] Evaluating k-ε with One-Equation Turbulence Model
    Rahman, M. M.
    Merilainen, A.
    Islam, A. K. M. Sadrul
    Lampinen, M. J.
    [J]. 5TH BSME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 56 : 206 - 216
  • [45] Resolving the dependence on freestream values for the k-ω turbulence model
    [J]. Kok, Johan C., 1600, AIAA, Reston (38):
  • [46] Extending the k-ω turbulence model towards oceanic applications
    Umlauf, L
    Burchard, H
    Hutter, K
    [J]. OCEAN MODELLING, 2003, 5 (03) : 195 - 218
  • [47] A k-Ω-kθ-Ωθ four parameter logarithmic turbulence model for liquid metals
    Da Via, R.
    Manservisi, S.
    Menghini, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2016, 101 : 1030 - 1041
  • [48] Model for single bubble growth of subcooled flow boiling in vertical narrow rectangular channel
    Yuan, Dewen
    Pan, Liangming
    Chen, Deqi
    [J]. Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal, 2009, 60 (11): : 2723 - 2728
  • [49] An assessment of k-ε turbulence models for gas distribution analysis
    Saeed, Muhammad
    Yu, Ji-Yang
    Abdalla, Aniseh Ahmed Atef
    Zhong, Xian-Ping
    Ghazanfar, Mahmood Ahmad
    [J]. NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES, 2017, 28 (10)
  • [50] Force balance model predictions of sliding bubbles velocity in vertical subcooled boiling flow
    Yoo, Junsoo
    Perez, Carlos E. Estrada
    Hassan, Yassin A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2021, 175