Uncertainty Analysis on k-ε Turbulence Model in the Prediction of Subcooled Boiling in Vertical Pipes

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Xiang [1 ]
Xia, Genglei [1 ]
Cong, Tenglong [2 ]
Peng, Minjun [1 ]
Wang, Zhenhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Engn Univ, Fundamental Sci Nucl Safety & Simulat Technol Lab, Harbin, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
subcooled boiling; uncertainty analysis; deterministic sampling method; turbulence model; computational fluid dynamics; FLOW; CFD;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2020.584531
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become an effective method for researching two-phase flow in reactor systems. However, the uncertainty analysis of Computational fluid dynamics simulation is still immature. The effects of uncertainties from two-phase models and boundary conditions have been analyzed in our previous work. In this work, the uncertainties from a turbulence model on the prediction of subcooled boiling flow were analyzed with the DEBORA benchmark experiments by a deterministic sampling method. Seven parameters in the standard k-epsilon model, which interrelated momentum, energy, turbulent kinetic energy, and dissipation rate, were studied as uncertainty sources, including C-mu, C-mu,C-g, C-1 epsilon, C-2 epsilon, sigma(k), sigma(epsilon), and Pr-t. Radial parameters were calculated to study the effects of uncertainties from the turbulence model. The contributions of each uncertainty source on void fraction and liquid temperature were also analyzed. It was found that the models can simulate subcooled boiling flow accurately and uncertainty analysis by deterministic sampling can give a reference interval to increase the reliability of results. The C-2 epsilon and C-1 epsilon, parameters in the production term and dissipation term of transport equations, dominate the radial distributions of void fraction and liquid temperature.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of bubble behavior in subcooled pool boiling based on microlayer model
    Zhao, Y
    Tsuruta, T
    [J]. JSME INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL SERIES B-FLUIDS AND THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 45 (02) : 346 - 354
  • [32] Conservative Formulation of the k-ε Turbulence Model for Shock-Turbulence Interaction
    Sinha, Krishnendu
    Balasridhar, S. J.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2013, 51 (08) : 1872 - 1882
  • [33] Application of different low-Reynolds k-ε turbulence models to model the flow of concentrated pulp suspensions in pipes
    Cotas, Carla
    Silva, Rui
    Garcia, Fernando
    Faia, Pedro
    Asendrych, Dariusz
    Rasteiro, Maria Graca
    [J]. NEW PARADIGM OF PARTICLE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH WORLD CONGRESS ON PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 102 : 1326 - 1335
  • [34] Further development of the k-ζ (enstrophy) turbulence closure model
    Robinson, DF
    Hassan, HA
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1998, 36 (10) : 1825 - 1833
  • [35] Positivity preservation and adaptive solution for the k-ε model of turbulence
    Ilinca, F
    Pelletier, D
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1998, 36 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [36] A (k-ε) turbulence closure model for plant canopy flows
    Hiraoka, H.
    Ohashi, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (10-11) : 2139 - 2149
  • [37] An improved k-ω turbulence model applied to recirculating flows
    Bredberg, J
    Peng, SH
    Davidson, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2002, 23 (06) : 731 - 743
  • [38] Influence of the wall condition on k-ω turbulence model predictions
    Thivet, F
    Daouk, M
    Knight, DD
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2002, 40 (01) : 179 - 181
  • [39] Bayesian estimates of parameter variability in the k-ε turbulence model
    Edeling, W. N.
    Cinnella, P.
    Dwight, R. P.
    Bijl, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2014, 258 : 73 - 94
  • [40] Suitability of the k-ω turbulence model for scramjet flowfield simulations
    Chan, W. Y. K.
    Jacobs, P. A.
    Mee, D. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2012, 70 (04) : 493 - 514