Infraposition of anterior maxillary implant-supported single-tooth restorations in adolescent and adult patients-A prospective follow-up study up to 6 years

被引:6
|
作者
Nilsson, Andree [1 ,2 ]
Johansson, Lars-Ake [1 ,3 ]
Stenport, Victoria F. [2 ]
Wennerberg, Ann [2 ]
Ekfeldt, Anders [4 ]
机构
[1] Halmstad Cty Hosp, Maxillofacial Unit, Div Prosthet Dent, Halmstad, Sweden
[2] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Odontol, Dept Prosthodontics Dent Mat Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Periodontol, Carl Gustavs Vag 34, SE-20506 Malmo, Sweden
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Dent, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent & Oral Funct, Oslo, Norway
关键词
clinical study; complications; dental implants; implant supported crown; infraposition; maxilla; patient satisfaction; ZIRCONIA ABUTMENTS; INCISOR REGION; ADJACENT TEETH; PLACEMENT; GROWTH; CROWNS; PINK;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12818
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background In the maxillary incisor area infraposition of implant restorations can be an esthetic problem. Purpose The aim was to analyze the prevalence of infraposition of single-tooth implant restorations in the anterior maxilla in adolescent and adult patients. Material and Methods The study comprised of 31 patients, 18 women and 13 men, with 39 restorations and with a mean and median age of 23.8 and 18.8 years, range 17.8 to 52.8 years, at the time of implant crown connection. The mean and median time in function for the restorations was 4.5 and 4.3 years respectively with a range of 3.3 to 6.6 years. Results Twenty restorations 51%, showed no signs of infraposition. A slight infraposition (<0.5 mm) was seen in 36% of the restorations. Only in one patient, the observed infraposition of the implant crown was more than 1 mm. We found no significant difference of the observed level of vertical infraposition, Score A (0 mm) and Score B (<0.5 mm), in subjects where the restoration was placed before the age of 20 years compared to the older patients. There were no significant differences in changes of the vertical infraposition when comparing different parameters such as age, gender, jaw relation (Angle-classes I-III), overbite/overjet, occlusal contact on the implant crown, bone augmentation before or at implant installation or if orthodontic treatment of the neighboring teeth had been made before or after the implant installation. Conclusions In the present study, there was a significant yet low correlation between the observed vertical infraposition of the single-tooth implant restoration and the subject's evaluation of the esthetics of the restoration (VAS). Fifty-one percent of the implant-supported crowns, showed no signs of vertical infraposition. A slight infraposition (< 0.5 mm) was however seen in 36% of the restorations. Only one crown showed a vertical infraposition of more than 1 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 959
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: An in vitro study
    Att, W
    Kurun, S
    Gerds, T
    Strub, JR
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2006, 95 (02): : 111 - 116
  • [12] A Prospective Clinical Study of Alumina-Toughened Zirconia Abutments for Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations with a Mean Follow-up Period of 6.9 Years
    Yoon, Hyung-In
    Yeo, In-Sung Luke
    Kim, Dae-Joon
    Kim, Hae-Young
    Han, Jung-Suk
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (02) : 451 - 460
  • [13] A 5-year prospective study on implant-supported single-tooth replacements.
    Gibbard, LPL
    Zarb, GA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 518 - 518
  • [14] A 3-year prospective study of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic materials in patients with tooth agenesis
    Hosseini, Mandana
    Worsaae, Nils
    Schiodt, Morten
    Gotfredsen, Klaus
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (10) : 1078 - 1087
  • [15] Retrospective clinical evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: Mean follow-up of 15 years
    Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
    Kisch, Jeno
    Larsson, Christel
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (07) : 691 - 701
  • [16] Two-Year Prospective Follow-up of Implant/Tooth-Supported Versus Freestanding Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures
    Akca, Kivanc
    Cehreli, Murat C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2008, 28 (06) : 593 - 599
  • [17] Medium- and Long-Term Survival Rates of Implant-Supported Single and Partial Restorations at a Maximum Follow-up of 12 Years: A Retrospective Study
    Corbella, Stefano
    Alberti, Alice
    Calciolari, Elena
    Francetti, Luca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 34 (02) : 183 - +
  • [18] Occurrence of Maxillary Central Diastema between Tooth-supported and Implant-supported Prostheses: a 5-year Clinical Follow-up
    Li, De Li
    Li, Shi Ying
    Tang, Zhi Hui
    Wu, Yu Wei
    Li, Liang Zhong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 22 (01): : 65 - 68
  • [19] Implant-Supported Immediately Loaded Complete Arch Rehabilitations with a Mean Follow-up of 10 Years: A Prospective Clinical Study
    Tartaglia, Gianluca Martino
    Farronato, Marco
    Sforza, Chiarella
    Bidra, Avinash S.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (09): : 951 - 957
  • [20] Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Single Posterior Implant-Supported Restorations Completed by Predoctoral Students: A Retrospective Study with Up to 10 Years of Follow Up
    Bompolaki, Despoina
    Edmondson, Sara A.
    Katancik, James A.
    Kamposiora, Phophi
    Papavasiliou, George
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 30 (02): : 111 - 118