Eczema apps conformance with clinical guidelines: a systematic assessment of functions, tools and content

被引:21
|
作者
van Galen, L. S. [1 ,2 ]
Xu, X. [1 ]
Koh, M. J. A. [3 ]
Thng, S. [4 ]
Car, J. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci CePHaS, Clin Sci Bldg,11 Mandalay Rd, Singapore 308232, Singapore
[2] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Internal Med, Sect Acute Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dermatol Serv, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Skin Ctr, 1 Mandalay Rd, Singapore 308205, Singapore
[5] Imperial Coll London, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth, Global Digital Hlth Unit, 3rd Floor Reynolds Bldg,St Dunstans Rd, London W6 8RP, England
关键词
ATOPIC-DERMATITIS; SMARTPHONE APPS; HEALTH; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; CHILDREN; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/bjd.18152
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Eczema is a prevalent complex skin condition requiring active disease monitoring and personalized education. No studies have assessed the quality of apps that aim to support eczema self-management. Objectives To evaluate the quality and comprehensiveness of English, Chinese and Spanish self-management eczema smartphone apps for patients and/or their caregivers. Methods A systematic assessment of eczema apps from July 2018 to November 2018. The assessment criteria were based on conformance with international eczema guidelines. The following domains were assessed: consistency and comprehensiveness of eczema-specific educational information; quality and comprehensiveness of eczema-specific tracking functions; compliance with health information best practice principles. Results In total, 98 apps were assessed: 82 (84%) provided educational information; 38 (39%) tracking functions; and 13 (13%) both. We found that 34% (28/82) of apps provided misleading information, particularly regarding aspects of treatment and disease progression of eczema. Only 15% (12/82) provided international guideline supported information on pharmacological therapies and 16% (13/82) on nonpharmacological therapies. Among 38 apps with a tracking function, 82% (31/38) measured specific symptoms, disease severity or current skin condition and 89% (34/38) helped users to record medication usage including application of topicals. Environmental or dietary allergens were recorded by 34% (13/38). None of the included apps complied with all criteria for educational information, tracking functions or health information principles. Conclusions Eczema apps have not yet reached their potential. The large variance in quality of eczema apps highlights the need for quality assurance mechanisms for health apps and guidance for clinicians that would enable them to make personalized recommendations for patients and caregivers.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 453
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical assessment of patients with chest pain; a systematic review of predictive tools
    Ayerbe, Luis
    Gonzalez, Esteban
    Gallo, Valentina
    Coleman, Claire L.
    Wragg, Andrew
    Robson, John
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2016, 16
  • [42] A systematic scoping review and content analysis of organizational health literacy responsiveness assessment tools
    Chu, Teresa Cheng-Chieh
    Kelly, Rebecca K.
    Hu, Yih-Jin
    Elmer, Shandell
    Nash, Rosie
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 39 (03)
  • [43] Assessment of content, behavior change techniques, and quality of unintended pregnancy apps in Spain: Systematic search on app stores
    Martin-Payo, Ruben
    Gonzalez-Mendez, Xana
    Carrasco-Santos, Sergio
    Munoz-Mancisidor, Aranzazu
    Papin-Cano, Cristina
    del Mar Fernandez-Alvarez, Maria
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [44] A Systematic Literature Review on Evaluation of Digital Tools for Authoring Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines
    Khodambashi, Soudabeh
    Nytro, Oystein
    INTEGRATING AND CONNECTING CARE, 2017, 239 : 48 - 54
  • [45] A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit
    Vlayen, J
    Aertgeerts, B
    Hannes, K
    Sermeus, W
    Ramaekers, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 17 (03) : 235 - 242
  • [46] Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: a systematic review
    Coronado Daza, Jorge
    Vernooij, Robin W. M.
    Salas, Karla
    Osorio, Dimelza
    Urrutia Cuchi, Gerard
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [47] Low-value care in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines
    Verkerk, Eva W.
    Huisman-de Waal, Getty
    Vermeulen, Hester
    Westert, Gert P.
    Kool, Rudolf B.
    van Dulmen, Simone A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2018, 87 : 34 - 39
  • [48] Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for integrative medicine in China: A systematic review
    Yao Sha
    Wei Dang
    Chen Yao-Long
    Wang Qi
    Wang Xiao-Qin
    Zeng Zhao
    Li Hui
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 23 (05) : 381 - 385
  • [49] QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN AXIAL AND PERIPHERAL SPONDYLARTHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC APPRAISAL
    Jauregui, Edwin
    Saldarriaga, Lina
    Bautista, Wilson
    Ricardo Pieschacon, Jose
    Ximena Rojas, Maria
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 26 : 107 - 107
  • [50] Assessment of obesity in children and adolescents: synthesis of recent systematic reviews and clinical guidelines
    Reilly, J. J.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2010, 23 (03) : 205 - 211