Eczema apps conformance with clinical guidelines: a systematic assessment of functions, tools and content

被引:21
|
作者
van Galen, L. S. [1 ,2 ]
Xu, X. [1 ]
Koh, M. J. A. [3 ]
Thng, S. [4 ]
Car, J. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci CePHaS, Clin Sci Bldg,11 Mandalay Rd, Singapore 308232, Singapore
[2] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Internal Med, Sect Acute Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dermatol Serv, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Skin Ctr, 1 Mandalay Rd, Singapore 308205, Singapore
[5] Imperial Coll London, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth, Global Digital Hlth Unit, 3rd Floor Reynolds Bldg,St Dunstans Rd, London W6 8RP, England
关键词
ATOPIC-DERMATITIS; SMARTPHONE APPS; HEALTH; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; CHILDREN; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/bjd.18152
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Eczema is a prevalent complex skin condition requiring active disease monitoring and personalized education. No studies have assessed the quality of apps that aim to support eczema self-management. Objectives To evaluate the quality and comprehensiveness of English, Chinese and Spanish self-management eczema smartphone apps for patients and/or their caregivers. Methods A systematic assessment of eczema apps from July 2018 to November 2018. The assessment criteria were based on conformance with international eczema guidelines. The following domains were assessed: consistency and comprehensiveness of eczema-specific educational information; quality and comprehensiveness of eczema-specific tracking functions; compliance with health information best practice principles. Results In total, 98 apps were assessed: 82 (84%) provided educational information; 38 (39%) tracking functions; and 13 (13%) both. We found that 34% (28/82) of apps provided misleading information, particularly regarding aspects of treatment and disease progression of eczema. Only 15% (12/82) provided international guideline supported information on pharmacological therapies and 16% (13/82) on nonpharmacological therapies. Among 38 apps with a tracking function, 82% (31/38) measured specific symptoms, disease severity or current skin condition and 89% (34/38) helped users to record medication usage including application of topicals. Environmental or dietary allergens were recorded by 34% (13/38). None of the included apps complied with all criteria for educational information, tracking functions or health information principles. Conclusions Eczema apps have not yet reached their potential. The large variance in quality of eczema apps highlights the need for quality assurance mechanisms for health apps and guidance for clinicians that would enable them to make personalized recommendations for patients and caregivers.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 453
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines in perioperative care: a systematic appraisal
    Barajas-Nava, Leticia
    Sola, Ivan
    Delgado-Noguera, Mario
    Gich, Ignasi
    Orrego Villagran, Carola
    Bonfill, Xavier
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (06): : e50
  • [32] Clinical assessment of patients with chest pain; a systematic review of predictive tools
    Luis Ayerbe
    Esteban González
    Valentina Gallo
    Claire L. Coleman
    Andrew Wragg
    John Robson
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 16
  • [33] Assessment Tools for Feedback and Entrustment Decisions in the Clinical Workplace: A Systematic Review
    Duijn, Chantal C. M. A.
    van Dijk, Emma J.
    Mandoki, Mira
    Bok, Harold G. J.
    ten Cate, Olle Th J.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 46 (03) : 340 - 352
  • [34] Frailty in trauma: A systematic review of the surgical literature for clinical assessment tools
    McDonald, Victoria S.
    Thompson, Kimberly A.
    Lewis, Paul R.
    Sise, C. Beth
    Sise, Michael J.
    Shackford, Steven R.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2016, 80 (05): : 824 - 834
  • [35] Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tools for assessment of acute stroke: a systematic review
    Antipova, Daria
    Eadie, Leila
    Macaden, Ashish
    Wilson, Philip
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [36] Tools available in Spanish for clinical assessment of delirium. Systematic review
    Diaz, Juliana
    Castrillon, Andrea
    Cardeno, Carlos
    Franco, Jose G.
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2023, 76 (06) : 197 - 208
  • [37] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF POLYPHARMACY DEFINITION, ASSESSMENT TOOLS, AND ASSOCIATION WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMES
    Masnoon, Nashwa
    Shakib, Sepehr
    Kalisch, Lisa
    Caughey, Gillian
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2017, 13 (04): : E28 - E29
  • [38] Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tools for assessment of acute stroke: a systematic review
    Daria Antipova
    Leila Eadie
    Ashish Macaden
    Philip Wilson
    BMC Emergency Medicine, 19
  • [39] Frailty in trauma: A systematic review of the surgical literature for clinical assessment tools
    Joseph, Bellal
    Hassan, Ahmed
    Pandit, Viraj
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2016, 81 (04): : 805 - 805
  • [40] Clinical performance assessment tools in physiotherapy practice education: a systematic review
    O'Connor, A.
    McGarr, O.
    Cantillon, P.
    McCurtin, A.
    Clifford, A.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2018, 104 (01) : 46 - 53