Development of Ar+16 charge exchange recombination spectroscopy measurements at ASDEX Upgrade

被引:16
|
作者
McDermott, R. M. [1 ]
Dux, R. [1 ]
Guzman, F. [2 ]
Puetterich, T. [1 ]
Fischer, R. [1 ]
Kappatou, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Plasma Phys, Boltzmannstr 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] Univ North Georgia, Dept Phys & Astron, Dahlonega, GA 30597 USA
关键词
plasma spectroscopy; argon charge exchange recombination spectroscopy; argon charge exchange cross-sections; argon spectroscopy;
D O I
10.1088/1741-4326/abc07f
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Argon is being considered as a radiator for future fusion devices. To support this, experiments in present day devices are needed to assess its effectiveness as a radiator and to study its compatibility with key aspects of reactor operation. For these purposes, accurate measurement of the Ar density in the confined plasma region are required. Charge exchange recombination spectroscopy is capable of providing this information, but requires validated cross-sections to produce accurate density profiles. For typical ASDEX Upgrade plasma parameters Ar+16 is the charge state of the most interest and the ArXVI n = 15-14 was identified as the best target for these measurements. Due to the fine structure splitting, the Ar charge exchange (CX) emission lines are highly asymmetric and detailed modeling is required to extract accurate ion temperatures or rotations. For the evaluation of Ar+16 densities, there are two main sets of CX cross-sections available: the data calculated by Schultz et al (Whyte et al 2010 J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys 43 144002, Schultz et al 2010 J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 144002) (ORNL) and by Errea et al (2006 J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 L91) (UAM). These cross-sections differ by over an order of magnitude and have very different energy dependencies. In this work, the validity of these datasets is tested experimentally. The Ar density profiles calculated using the ORNL cross-sections are 10-50x too large while the UAM densities are a factor of 2.73 too small. The UAM data, however, does a much better job at capturing the observed energy dependence. The authors conclude that the CTMC calculations of Errea, which use a hydrogenic distribution to describe the initial target and donor distributions better reproduce the experimental data. However, to produce accurate Ar density profiles, these cross-sections need to be corrected downward and the best profiles are produced with a small correction to the UAM energy dependence.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development of laser induced breakdown spectroscopy for studying erosion, deposition, and fuel retention in ASDEX Upgrade
    Paris, Peeter
    Piip, Kaarel
    Hakola, Antti
    Laan, Matti
    Aints, Maert
    Koivuranta, Seppo
    Likonen, Jari
    Lissovski, Aleksandr
    Mayer, Matej
    Neu, Rudolf
    Rohde, Volker
    Sugiyama, Kazuyoshi
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2015, 98-99 : 1349 - 1352
  • [42] Effect of the radial electric field on the results of measurements of the poloidal rotation of a tokamak plasma by charge exchange recombination spectroscopy
    Romannikov, AN
    Chernobai, AP
    PLASMA PHYSICS REPORTS, 2001, 27 (11) : 994 - 996
  • [43] Effect of the radial electric field on the results of measurements of the poloidal rotation of a tokamak plasma by charge exchange recombination spectroscopy
    A. N. Romannikov
    A. P. Chernobai
    Plasma Physics Reports, 2001, 27 : 994 - 996
  • [44] Charge exchange recombination spectroscopy measurements of DIII-D poloidal rotation with poloidal asymmetry in angular rotation
    Chrystal, C.
    Haskey, S. R.
    Burrell, K. H.
    Grierson, B. A.
    Collins, C. S.
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2021, 92 (04):
  • [45] First measurements with a Coherence Imaging Charge Exchange Recombination Spectroscopy (CICERS) diagnostic at Wendelstein 7-X
    Lopez-Cansino, R.
    Perseo, V
    Viezzer, E.
    Kriete, D. M.
    Ford, O. P.
    Romba, T.
    Poloskei, P. Zs
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2024, 66 (04)
  • [46] Helium line ratio spectroscopy for high spatiotemporal resolution plasma edge profile measurements at ASDEX Upgrade (invited)
    Griener, M.
    Wolfrum, E.
    Cavedon, M.
    Dux, R.
    Rohde, V.
    Sochor, M.
    Burgos, J. M. Munoz
    Schmitz, O.
    Stroth, U.
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2018, 89 (10):
  • [47] Development of a laser cleaning method for the first mirror surface of the charge exchange recombination spectroscopy diagnostics on ITER
    Kuznetsov, A. P.
    Buzinskij, O. I.
    Gubsky, K. L.
    Nikitina, E. A.
    Savchenkov, A. V.
    Tarasov, B. A.
    Tugarinov, S. N.
    PHYSICS OF ATOMIC NUCLEI, 2015, 78 (14) : 1677 - 1685
  • [48] Development of a laser cleaning method for the first mirror surface of the charge exchange recombination spectroscopy diagnostics on ITER
    A. P. Kuznetsov
    O. I. Buzinskij
    K. L. Gubsky
    E. A. Nikitina
    A. V. Savchenkov
    B. A. Tarasov
    S. N. Tugarinov
    Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 2015, 78 : 1677 - 1685
  • [49] Influence of neutral beam attenuation on beam emission spectroscopy and charge exchange recombination spectroscopy
    Yu, Y.
    Wang, H. J.
    Chen, Z.
    Chen, R.
    Lan, T.
    Li, Y. Y.
    Zang, Q.
    Zhang, J.
    Zhao, H. L.
    Mao, S. F.
    Lyu, B.
    Ye, M. Y.
    Wan, B. N.
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2018, 89 (07):
  • [50] Fast charge exchange recombination spectroscopy on HuanLiu-2A tokamak
    He, X. X.
    Yu, D. L.
    Yan, L. W.
    Liu, L.
    Chen, W. J.
    Wei, Y. L.
    He, X. F.
    Ma, Q.
    Shi, Z. B.
    Liu, Yi
    Yang, Q. W.
    Xu, M.
    Duan, X. R.
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2020, 91 (05):