Development of Ar+16 charge exchange recombination spectroscopy measurements at ASDEX Upgrade

被引:16
|
作者
McDermott, R. M. [1 ]
Dux, R. [1 ]
Guzman, F. [2 ]
Puetterich, T. [1 ]
Fischer, R. [1 ]
Kappatou, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Plasma Phys, Boltzmannstr 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] Univ North Georgia, Dept Phys & Astron, Dahlonega, GA 30597 USA
关键词
plasma spectroscopy; argon charge exchange recombination spectroscopy; argon charge exchange cross-sections; argon spectroscopy;
D O I
10.1088/1741-4326/abc07f
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Argon is being considered as a radiator for future fusion devices. To support this, experiments in present day devices are needed to assess its effectiveness as a radiator and to study its compatibility with key aspects of reactor operation. For these purposes, accurate measurement of the Ar density in the confined plasma region are required. Charge exchange recombination spectroscopy is capable of providing this information, but requires validated cross-sections to produce accurate density profiles. For typical ASDEX Upgrade plasma parameters Ar+16 is the charge state of the most interest and the ArXVI n = 15-14 was identified as the best target for these measurements. Due to the fine structure splitting, the Ar charge exchange (CX) emission lines are highly asymmetric and detailed modeling is required to extract accurate ion temperatures or rotations. For the evaluation of Ar+16 densities, there are two main sets of CX cross-sections available: the data calculated by Schultz et al (Whyte et al 2010 J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys 43 144002, Schultz et al 2010 J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 144002) (ORNL) and by Errea et al (2006 J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 L91) (UAM). These cross-sections differ by over an order of magnitude and have very different energy dependencies. In this work, the validity of these datasets is tested experimentally. The Ar density profiles calculated using the ORNL cross-sections are 10-50x too large while the UAM densities are a factor of 2.73 too small. The UAM data, however, does a much better job at capturing the observed energy dependence. The authors conclude that the CTMC calculations of Errea, which use a hydrogenic distribution to describe the initial target and donor distributions better reproduce the experimental data. However, to produce accurate Ar density profiles, these cross-sections need to be corrected downward and the best profiles are produced with a small correction to the UAM energy dependence.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Toroidal charge exchange recombination spectroscopy on EAST
    Ye, Minyou
    Li, Yingying
    Yu, Yi
    Shi, Yuejiang
    Lyu, Bo
    Fu, Jia
    Du, Xuewei
    Yin, Xianghui
    Zhang, Yi
    Wang, Qiuping
    Wan, Baonian
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2015, 96-97 : 1017 - 1020
  • [22] Wall reflection modeling for charge exchange recombination spectroscopy (CXRS) measurements on Textor and ITER
    Banerjee, Santanu
    Vasu, P.
    von Hellermann, M.
    Jaspers, R. J. E.
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2010, 52 (12)
  • [23] CHARGE-EXCHANGE RECOMBINATION SPECTROSCOPY MEASUREMENTS OF ION TEMPERATURE AND PLASMA ROTATION IN PBX
    JAEHNIG, KP
    FONCK, RJ
    IDA, K
    POWELL, ET
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1985, 56 (05): : 865 - 867
  • [24] Modeling fast charge exchange recombination spectroscopy measurements from the Madison Symmetric Torus
    Gangadhara, S.
    Craig, D.
    Ennis, D. A.
    Den Hartog, D. J.
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2006, 77 (10):
  • [25] Development of the gas puff charge exchange recombination spectroscopy (GP-CXRS) technique for ion measurements in the plasma edge
    Churchill, R. M.
    Theiler, C.
    Lipschultz, B.
    Dux, R.
    Puetterich, T.
    Viezzer, E.
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2013, 84 (09):
  • [26] State-selective electron capture in Ar16++ H(1s) collisions for charge-exchange recombination spectroscopy
    Kotian, A. M.
    Antonio, N. W.
    Marchuk, O.
    Kadyrov, A. S.
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2024, 66 (09)
  • [27] Kinetics of highly excited states in Ar17+ charge exchange recombination fusion plasma spectroscopy
    Marchuk, O.
    Ralchenko, Yu
    Janev, R. K.
    Bertschinger, G.
    Biel, W.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS B-ATOMIC MOLECULAR AND OPTICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 42 (16)
  • [28] Calibration of the charge exchange recombination spectroscopy diagnostic for core poloidal rotation velocity measurements on JET
    Crombé, K
    Andrew, Y
    Giroud, C
    Hawkes, NC
    Murari, A
    Valisa, M
    Van Oost, G
    Zastrow, KD
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2004, 75 (10): : 3452 - 3454
  • [29] Imaging charge exchange recombination spectroscopy on the TEXTOR tokamak
    Howard, J.
    Jaspers, R.
    Lischtschenko, O.
    Delabie, E.
    Chung, J.
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2010, 52 (12)
  • [30] The development of charge exchange recombination spectroscopy diagnostics for the T-15MD tokamak
    Krupin, V.
    Zemtsov, I.
    Nurgaliev, M.
    Klyuchnikov, L.
    Nemets, A.
    Ivanov, A.
    Stupishin, N.
    Naumenko, N.
    Tugarinov, S.
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2020, 15 (02):