Diagnostic capacity of skin tumor artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making software in real-world clinical settings

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Cheng-Xu [1 ,2 ]
Fei, Wen-Min [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Chang-Bing [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Zi-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Jing, Yan [5 ]
Meng, Ru-Song [6 ]
Cui, Yong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Dermatol, 2 Yinghua East St, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll & Chinese Acad Med Sci, Grad Sch, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Hebrew SeniorLife, Hinda & Arthur Marcus Inst Aging Res, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Dermatol, Hefei 230032, Anhui, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army, Specialty Med Ctr Air Force, Dept Dermatol, Beijing 100142, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Skin tumor; Diagnostic accuracy; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1097/CM9.0000000000001002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Youzhi artificial intelligence (AI) software is the AI-assisted decision-making system for diagnosing skin tumors. The high diagnostic accuracy of Youzhi AI software was previously validated in specific datasets. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of diagnostic capacity between Youzhi AI software and dermatologists in real-world clinical settings. Methods A total of 106 patients who underwent skin tumor resection in the Dermatology Department of China-Japan Friendship Hospital from July 2017 to June 2019 and were confirmed as skin tumors by pathological biopsy were selected. Dermoscopy and clinical images of 106 patients were diagnosed by Youzhi AI software and dermatologists at different dermoscopy diagnostic levels. The primary outcome was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Youzhi AI software with that of dermatologists and that measured in the laboratory using specific data sets. The secondary results included the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, F-measure, and Matthews correlation coefficient of Youzhi AI software in the real-world. Results The diagnostic accuracy of Youzhi AI software in real-world clinical settings was lower than that of the laboratory data (P < 0.001). The output result of Youzhi AI software has good stability after several tests. Youzhi AI software diagnosed benign and malignant diseases by recognizing dermoscopic images and diagnosed disease types with higher diagnostic accuracy than by recognizing clinical images (P = 0.008,P = 0.016, respectively). Compared with dermatologists, Youzhi AI software was more accurate in the diagnosis of skin tumor types through the recognition of dermoscopic images (P = 0.01). By evaluating the diagnostic performance of dermatologists under different modes, the diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists in diagnosing disease types by matching dermoscopic and clinical images was significantly higher than that by identifying dermoscopic and clinical images in random sequence (P = 0.022). The diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists in the diagnosis of benign and malignant diseases by recognizing dermoscopic images was significantly higher than that by recognizing clinical images (P = 0.010). Conclusion The diagnostic accuracy of Youzhi AI software for skin tumors in real-world clinical settings was not as high as that of using special data sets in the laboratory. However, there was no significant difference between the diagnostic capacity of Youzhi AI software and the average diagnostic capacity of dermatologists. It can provide assistant diagnostic decisions for dermatologists in the current state.
引用
收藏
页码:2020 / 2026
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Decision-Making and Personality Traits; Achilles' Heel of Artificial Intelligence
    Khalilipur, Ehsan
    Chinikar, Majid
    Mehrani, Mehdi
    Elahifar, Armin
    RESEARCH IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (01) : 36 - 37
  • [42] Breaking Bias: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Clinical Decision-Making
    Brown, Chris
    Nazeer, Rayiz
    Gibbs, Austin
    Le Page, Pierre
    Mitchell, Andrew R. J.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [43] German surgeons' perspective on the application of artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making
    Henn, Jonas
    Vandemeulebroucke, Tijs
    Hatterscheidt, Simon
    Dohmen, Jonas
    Kalff, Joerg C.
    van Wynsberghe, Aimee
    Matthaei, Hanno
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2025,
  • [44] Artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making: Rethinking personal moral responsibility
    Smith, Helen
    Birchley, Giles
    Ives, Jonathan
    BIOETHICS, 2024, 38 (01) : 78 - 86
  • [45] A narrative review of artificial intelligence-assisted histopathologic diagnosis and decision-making for non-small cell lung cancer: achievements and limitations
    Li, Yongzhong
    Chen, Donglai
    Wu, Xuejie
    Yang, Wentao
    Chen, Yongbing
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2021, 13 (12) : 7006 - 7020
  • [46] OPTIMA prostate cancer care pathways - bridging clinical practice guidelines, real world evidence and artificial intelligence to enhance decision-making
    Santiago, Anselmo da Costa I.
    Rivas, Gomez J.
    Maclennan, S.
    Beyer, K.
    Murray, C.
    Smith, E. J.
    Auweter, S.
    Thomas, M.
    Krueger, H.
    N'dow, J.
    Bjartell, A.
    Cornford, P.
    Roobol, M.
    Omar, M. I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1885 - S1886
  • [47] Real-world lung cancer screening decision-making: Barriers and facilitators
    Lowenstein, Margaret
    Vijayaraghavan, Maya
    Burke, Nancy J.
    Karliner, Leah
    Wang, Sunny
    Peters, Melissa
    Lozano, Amy
    Kaplan, Celia P.
    LUNG CANCER, 2019, 133 : 32 - 37
  • [48] Real-world and game-based learning to enhance decision-making
    Vazquez-Calatayud, Monica
    Garcia-Garcia, Raquel
    Regaira-Martinez, Elena
    Gomez-Urquiza, Jose
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 140
  • [49] To Read or Not to Read a Food Label: A Real-World Decision-Making Task
    Gardiner, Jessie
    Turcotte, Josee
    Oddson, Bruce
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2012, 66 (04): : 282 - 282
  • [50] Artificial intelligence framework for simulating clinical decision-making: A Markov decision process approach
    Bennett, Casey C.
    Hauser, Kris
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2013, 57 (01) : 9 - 19