Diagnostic capacity of skin tumor artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making software in real-world clinical settings

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Cheng-Xu [1 ,2 ]
Fei, Wen-Min [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Chang-Bing [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Zi-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Jing, Yan [5 ]
Meng, Ru-Song [6 ]
Cui, Yong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Dermatol, 2 Yinghua East St, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll & Chinese Acad Med Sci, Grad Sch, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Hebrew SeniorLife, Hinda & Arthur Marcus Inst Aging Res, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Dermatol, Hefei 230032, Anhui, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army, Specialty Med Ctr Air Force, Dept Dermatol, Beijing 100142, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Skin tumor; Diagnostic accuracy; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1097/CM9.0000000000001002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Youzhi artificial intelligence (AI) software is the AI-assisted decision-making system for diagnosing skin tumors. The high diagnostic accuracy of Youzhi AI software was previously validated in specific datasets. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of diagnostic capacity between Youzhi AI software and dermatologists in real-world clinical settings. Methods A total of 106 patients who underwent skin tumor resection in the Dermatology Department of China-Japan Friendship Hospital from July 2017 to June 2019 and were confirmed as skin tumors by pathological biopsy were selected. Dermoscopy and clinical images of 106 patients were diagnosed by Youzhi AI software and dermatologists at different dermoscopy diagnostic levels. The primary outcome was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Youzhi AI software with that of dermatologists and that measured in the laboratory using specific data sets. The secondary results included the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, F-measure, and Matthews correlation coefficient of Youzhi AI software in the real-world. Results The diagnostic accuracy of Youzhi AI software in real-world clinical settings was lower than that of the laboratory data (P < 0.001). The output result of Youzhi AI software has good stability after several tests. Youzhi AI software diagnosed benign and malignant diseases by recognizing dermoscopic images and diagnosed disease types with higher diagnostic accuracy than by recognizing clinical images (P = 0.008,P = 0.016, respectively). Compared with dermatologists, Youzhi AI software was more accurate in the diagnosis of skin tumor types through the recognition of dermoscopic images (P = 0.01). By evaluating the diagnostic performance of dermatologists under different modes, the diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists in diagnosing disease types by matching dermoscopic and clinical images was significantly higher than that by identifying dermoscopic and clinical images in random sequence (P = 0.022). The diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists in the diagnosis of benign and malignant diseases by recognizing dermoscopic images was significantly higher than that by recognizing clinical images (P = 0.010). Conclusion The diagnostic accuracy of Youzhi AI software for skin tumors in real-world clinical settings was not as high as that of using special data sets in the laboratory. However, there was no significant difference between the diagnostic capacity of Youzhi AI software and the average diagnostic capacity of dermatologists. It can provide assistant diagnostic decisions for dermatologists in the current state.
引用
收藏
页码:2020 / 2026
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Barriers and facilitators to implementing imaging-based diagnostic artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making software in hospitals in China: a qualitative study using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
    Liao, Xiwen
    Yao, Chen
    Jin, Feifei
    Zhang, Jun
    Liu, Larry
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (09):
  • [22] Pricing analysis of decision-making software: modelling and Artificial Intelligence approaches
    Dave, Dinesh
    Aggarwal, Ajay
    Challa, Chandrashekar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 26 (04) : 175 - 181
  • [23] Comparison of two assessments of real-world data and real-world evidence for regulatory decision-making
    Yuan, Lily
    Rahman, Motiur
    Concato, John
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 17 (01):
  • [24] Capsule endoscopy with artificial intelligence-assisted technology: Real-world usage of a validated AI model for capsule image review
    O'Hara, Fintan John
    Namara, Deirdre Mc
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (10) : E970 - E975
  • [25] Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Clinical Decision-Making in Health Care
    Maron, Jill L.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 44 (06) : 825 - 826
  • [26] Decision-Making Capacity to Refuse Treatment at the End of Life: The Need for Recognizing Real-World Practices
    Akabayashi, Akira
    Nakazawa, Eisuke
    Ino, Hiroyasu
    CLINICS AND PRACTICE, 2022, 12 (05) : 760 - 765
  • [27] Artificial intelligence-assisted clinical decision support for childhood asthma management: A randomized clinical trial
    Seol, Hee Yun
    Shrestha, Pragya
    Muth, Joy Fladager
    Wi, Chung-Il
    Sohn, Sunghwan
    Ryu, Euijung
    Park, Miguel
    Ihrke, Kathy
    Moon, Sungrim
    King, Katherine
    Wheeler, Philip
    Borah, Bijan
    Moriarty, James
    Rosedahl, Jordan
    Liu, Hongfang
    McWilliams, Deborah B.
    Juhn, Young J.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [28] Role of Real-World Evidence in Clinical Decision-Making for the Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer
    Caveney, Brian
    AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2017, 10 (03): : 152 - 154
  • [29] Risk assessment in clinical practice: a framework for decision-making in real-world complex systems
    Nathan, Rajan
    Bhandari, Sahil
    BJPSYCH ADVANCES, 2024, 30 (01) : 53 - 63
  • [30] Real-world experience of Molecular Tumour Boards for clinical decision-making for cancer patients
    Colomina, Julio Herrero
    Johnston, Eleanor
    Duffus, Kate
    Zair, Zoulikha M.
    Thistlethwaite, Fiona
    Krebs, Matthew
    Carter, Louise
    Graham, Donna
    Cook, Natalie
    NPJ PRECISION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 9 (01)