Visual Acuity, Quality of Vision, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation with a Trifocal or Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens

被引:13
|
作者
Tran, Dan B. [1 ]
Owyang, Ashley [1 ]
Hwang, Jin [1 ]
Potvin, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Coastal Vis Med Grp, 293 S Main St,Suite 100, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Sci Vis, Bend, OR USA
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2021年 / 15卷
关键词
trifocal IOL; EDOF IOL; presbyopia correction; cataract surgery; extended depth of focus; SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; RANGE;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S295503
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the visual acuity, quality of vision and patient reported outcomes for patients that were either bilaterally implanted with a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) or an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL. Design: Single site, prospective, non-interventional, masked, two-arm comparative study. Methods: Subjects who had prior uncomplicated cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of one of the lenses above were evaluated. Subjects in each group were assessed during a single visit. The uncorrected and best distance-corrected binocular near (40 cm), intermediate (60 cm), and distance visual acuity (VA) were measured, along with a spectacle independence questionnaire, a quality of vision questionnaire and contrast sensitivity measured in both mesopic and photopic conditions. Results: The study included 23 EDOF and 25 trifocal subjects. Binocular Uncorrected VAs were similar at distance and intermediate, but about 1.5 lines better at near with the trifocal (p < 0.001). Binocular best corrected distance - VA was significantly better with the EDOF lens (0.5 lines, p < 0.001), though the mean VA was better than 20/20 in both groups. Distance-corrected intermediate and near VA were significantly better with the trifocal IOL (1 line and 1.5 lines respectively, p < 0.001). Significantly more trifocal subjects had 20/25 or better VA at all three test distances (64% vs 4%, p<0.001). Patient reported spectacle independence was significantly higher in the trifocal group, driven primarily by differences in near vision. Mesopic and photopic binocular contrast sensitivity, satisfaction and subjective quality of vision scores were similar between groups. Conclusion: The trifocal IOL provided significantly better near vision (1.5 lines) with slightly worse distance vision (0.5 lines), while providing similar contrast sensitivity and visual quality. It may be the preferred choice for patients desiring more spectacle independence.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 412
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient Satisfaction and Visual Performance in Patients with Ocular Pathology after Bilateral Implantation of a New Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens
    Rementeria-Capelo, Laureano A.
    Lorente, Pilar
    Carrillo, Virginia
    Sanchez-Pina, Jose M.
    Ruiz-Alcocer, Javier
    Contreras, Ines
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [32] The relationship between patient satisfaction and visual and optical outcome after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus multifocal intraocular lens
    Mihaltz, Kata
    Szegedi, Stephan
    Steininger, Jolanda
    Vecsei-Marlovits, Pia Veronika
    ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2022, 2 (01):
  • [33] Early outcomes of vision and objective visual quality analysis after cataract surgery with trifocal intraocular lens implantation
    Mei-Fang Chu
    Na Hui
    Cong-Yi Wang
    Lei Yu
    Bo Ma
    Yan Li
    Cheng Pei
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2019, 12 (10) : 1575 - 1581
  • [34] Early outcomes of vision and objective visual quality analysis after cataract surgery with trifocal intraocular lens implantation
    Chu, Mei-Fang
    Hui, Na
    Wang, Cong-Yi
    Yu, Lei
    Ma, Bo
    Li, Yan
    Pei, Cheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 12 (10) : 1575 - 1581
  • [35] Evaluation of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens
    Mendicute, Javier
    Kapp, Alexander
    Levy, Pierre
    Krommes, Gero
    Arias-Puente, Alfonso
    Tomalla, Mark
    Barraquer, Elena
    Rozot, Pascal
    Bouchut, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (02): : 203 - 210
  • [36] Visual outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens
    Sheppard, Amy L.
    Shah, Sunil
    Bhatt, Uday
    Bhogal, Gurpreet
    Wolffsohn, James S.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (03): : 343 - 349
  • [37] Visual outcomes, spectacle independence and patient-reported satisfaction of the Vivity extended range of vision intraocular lens
    Kerr, Nathan
    Moshegov, Sophia
    Lim, Samantha
    Simos, Maria
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 51 (09): : 957 - 957
  • [38] Tolerance to induced astigmatism of patients with trifocal or extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation
    Mu, Jiancheng
    Xiong, Tianxu
    Xu, Feng
    Guo, Wanyue
    Sun, Chuhuan
    Chen, Hao
    Fan, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [39] Analysis of uncorrected near visual acuity after extended depth-of-focus AcrySof® Vivity™ intraocular lens implantation
    Jeon, Sohee
    Choi, Ayoung
    Kwon, Hyunggoo
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (11):
  • [40] Comparison of visual outcomes and subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of apodized diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
    Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
    Potvin, Rick
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 805 - 811