Visual outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens

被引:130
|
作者
Sheppard, Amy L. [1 ,2 ]
Shah, Sunil [1 ,3 ]
Bhatt, Uday [1 ]
Bhogal, Gurpreet [1 ]
Wolffsohn, James S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
[2] Aston Univ, Aston Res Ctr Healthy Ageing, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
[3] Midland Eye Inst, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
关键词
CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CATARACT-SURGERY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; PERFORMANCE; DISTANCE; QUALITY; RESTOR; EXPECTATIONS; EXTRACTION; ACUITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.09.017
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess clinical outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Midland Eye Institute, Solihull, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: Patients had bilateral implantation of Finevision trifocal IOLs. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and manifest refraction were measured 2 months postoperatively. Defocus curves were assessed under photopic and mesopic conditions over a range of +1.50 to -4.00 diopters (D) in 0.50 D steps. Contrast sensitivity function was assessed under photopic conditions. Halometry was used to measure the angular size of monocular and binocular photopic scotomas arising from a glare source. Patient satisfaction with uncorrected near vision was assessed using the Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ). RESULTS: The mean monocular CDVA was 0.08 log MAR +/- 0.08 (SD) and the mean binocular CDVA, 0.06 +/- 0.08 logMAR. Defocus curve testing showed an extended range of clear vision from +1.00 to -2.50 D defocus, with a significant difference in acuity between photopic conditions and mesopic conditions at -1.50 D defocus only. Photopic contrast sensitivity was significantly better binocularly than monocularly at all spatial frequencies. Halometry showed a glare scotoma of a mean size similar to that in previous studies of multifocal and accommodating IOLs; there were no subjective complaints of dysphotopsia. The mean NAVQ Rasch score for satisfaction with near vision was 15.9 +/- 10.7 logits. CONCLUSIONS: The trifocal IOL implanted binocularly produced good distance visual acuity and near and intermediate visual function. Patients were very satisfied with their uncorrected near vision. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39:343-349 (C) 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 349
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visual outcomes after bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation
    Carballo-Alvarez, Jesus
    Vazquez-Molini, Jose M.
    Sanz-Fernandez, Juan C.
    Garcia-Bella, Javier
    Polo, Vicente
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, Jose M.
    [J]. BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [2] Visual outcomes after bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation
    Jesús Carballo-Alvarez
    Jose M Vazquez-Molini
    Juan C Sanz-Fernandez
    Javier Garcia-Bella
    Vicente Polo
    Julián García-Feijoo
    Jose M Martinez-de-la-Casa
    [J]. BMC Ophthalmology, 15
  • [3] Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a new trifocal diffractive intraocular lens
    Almulhim, Abdulmohsen K.
    Alarfaj, Khalid M.
    Altaisan, Abdulaziz A.
    Alromaih, Arwa Z.
    Aldawod, Razan A.
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 32 (04) : 310 - 317
  • [4] Comparison of visual outcomes and subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of apodized diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
    Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
    Potvin, Rick
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 805 - 811
  • [5] Comparative Evaluation of Visual Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens and an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens
    Singh, Bhupesh
    Sharma, Sourabh
    Dadia, Suchit
    Bharti, Neha
    Bharti, Sudhank
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 46 (05): : 314 - 318
  • [6] Visual outcomes after implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens
    Izquierdo, Luis
    Henriquez, Maria
    Rodriguez, Mauricio
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [7] Clinical Outcomes after Binocular Implantation of a New Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens
    Kretz, Florian T. A.
    Breyer, Detlev
    Diakonis, Vasilios F.
    Klabe, Karsten
    Henke, Franziska
    Auffarth, Gerd U.
    Kaymak, Hakan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [8] Evaluation of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens
    Mendicute, Javier
    Kapp, Alexander
    Levy, Pierre
    Krommes, Gero
    Arias-Puente, Alfonso
    Tomalla, Mark
    Barraquer, Elena
    Rozot, Pascal
    Bouchut, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (02): : 203 - 210
  • [9] Influence of angle κ on visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens
    Garzon, Nuria
    Garcia-Montero, Maria
    Lopez-Artero, Esther
    Albarran-Diego, Cesar
    Perez-Cambrod, Rafael
    Illarramendi, Igor
    Poyales, Francisco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 46 (05): : 721 - 727
  • [10] Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens
    Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
    Potvin, Rick
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 455 - 461