Risk factors for the breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal delivery

被引:46
|
作者
Williams, Meredith K. [1 ]
Chames, Mark C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
perineal laceration; mediolateral episiotomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.085
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors that are associated with the breakdown of perineal laceration repair in the postpartum period. Study design: We conducted a retrospective, case-control study to review perineal laceration repair breakdown in patients who were delivered between September 1995 and February 2005 at the University of Michigan. Bivariate analysis with chi-square test and t-test and stepwise logistic regression analysis were performed. Results: Fifty-nine cases and 118 control deliveries were identified from a total of 14,124 vaginal deliveries. Risk factors were longer second stage of labor (142 vs 87 minutes; P =.001), operative vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-7.3), mediolateral episiotomy (odds ratio, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.6-18.7), third- or fourth-degree laceration (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.4), and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% CL 1.1-7.9). Previous vaginal delivery was protective (odds ratio, 0.38; 95 % CI, 0.18-0.84). Logistic regression showed the most significant factor to be an interaction between operative vaginal delivery and mediolateral episiotomy (odd ratio, 6.36; 95% Cl, 2.18-18.57). Conclusion: The most significant events were mediolateral episiotomy, especially in conjunction with operative vaginal delivery, third- and fourth-degree lacerations, and meconium. (c) 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 759
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in vaginal delivery, with an analysis of episiotomy types
    Bodner-Adler, B
    Bodner, K
    Kaider, A
    Wagenbichler, P
    Leodolter, S
    Husslein, P
    Mayerhofer, K
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (08) : 752 - 756
  • [42] Risk factors for perineal trauma in the primiparous population during non-operative vaginal delivery
    D'Souza, Joanna C.
    Monga, Ash
    Tincello, Douglas G.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (03) : 621 - 625
  • [43] Risk factors for perineal trauma in the primiparous population during non-operative vaginal delivery
    Joanna C. D’Souza
    Ash Monga
    Douglas G. Tincello
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31 : 621 - 625
  • [44] Factors related to perineal outcome after vaginal delivery in primiparas: a cross-sectional study
    Tavares de Souza, Marcella Rocha
    Vidal Cavalcante Farias, Laryssa Miranda
    Ribeiro, Gabriela Lima
    Coelho, Tatiane da Silva
    da Costa, Camila Chaves
    de Castro Damasceno, Ana Kelve
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2020, 54
  • [45] What are the risk factors for anal incontinence after vaginal delivery?
    Pirro, N.
    Sastre, B.
    Sielezneff, I.
    JOURNAL DE CHIRURGIE, 2007, 144 (03): : 197 - 202
  • [46] Retained placenta after vaginal delivery: risk factors and management
    Perlman, Nicola C.
    Carusi, Daniela A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 11 : 527 - 534
  • [47] Risk Factors for Perineal Tears in Normal Vaginal Births
    Rathfisch, G.
    Beji, N. Kizilkaya
    TekIrdag, A. I.
    Aslan, H.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2011, 71 (08) : 677 - 682
  • [48] REPAIR OF VAGINAL PROLAPSE AND PERINEAL HERNIA AFTER PELVIC EXENTERATION
    BARNHILL, D
    HOSKINS, W
    HELLER, P
    REPKA, M
    PARK, R
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 65 (05): : 764 - 766
  • [49] Vaginal delivery combined with vaginal tightening surgery and perineal body repair 5 case reports
    Wu, Hui
    Wang, Shuang
    Li, Qiang
    Zhou, Chuande
    Chen, Jing
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (01)
  • [50] Episiotomy and increase in the risk of obstetric laceration in a subsequent vaginal delivery - Reply
    Alperin, Marianna
    Parviainen, Kristiina
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (03): : 708 - 708