Risk factors for the breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal delivery

被引:44
|
作者
Williams, Meredith K. [1 ]
Chames, Mark C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
perineal laceration; mediolateral episiotomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.085
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors that are associated with the breakdown of perineal laceration repair in the postpartum period. Study design: We conducted a retrospective, case-control study to review perineal laceration repair breakdown in patients who were delivered between September 1995 and February 2005 at the University of Michigan. Bivariate analysis with chi-square test and t-test and stepwise logistic regression analysis were performed. Results: Fifty-nine cases and 118 control deliveries were identified from a total of 14,124 vaginal deliveries. Risk factors were longer second stage of labor (142 vs 87 minutes; P =.001), operative vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-7.3), mediolateral episiotomy (odds ratio, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.6-18.7), third- or fourth-degree laceration (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.4), and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% CL 1.1-7.9). Previous vaginal delivery was protective (odds ratio, 0.38; 95 % CI, 0.18-0.84). Logistic regression showed the most significant factor to be an interaction between operative vaginal delivery and mediolateral episiotomy (odd ratio, 6.36; 95% Cl, 2.18-18.57). Conclusion: The most significant events were mediolateral episiotomy, especially in conjunction with operative vaginal delivery, third- and fourth-degree lacerations, and meconium. (c) 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 759
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The risk factors and outcome of third and fourth degree perineal tear following vaginal delivery
    Shafiee, M. N.
    Mohd, H.
    Lim, A.
    Abdul, A.
    Omar, M. H.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 : 108 - 108
  • [32] MANAGEMENT OF WOUND BREAKDOWN AFTER PRIMARY REPAIR OF FACIAL LACERATION
    SANDERS, B
    ANDREWS, J
    AKERS, P
    LAWRENCE, F
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1974, 32 (07): : 531 - 534
  • [33] Episiotomy and increase in the risk of obstetric laceration in a subsequent vaginal delivery
    Alperin, Marianna
    Krohn, Maryane A.
    Parviainen, Kristiina
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (06): : 1274 - 1278
  • [34] Naproxen suppository for perineal pain after vaginal delivery
    Wilasrusmee, Skuntala
    Chittachareon, Apichart
    Jirasiritum, Siriwan
    Srisangchai, Prasong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2008, 102 (01) : 19 - 22
  • [35] Risk factors for operative vaginal delivery after a previous instrumental delivery
    Brognard, Marlene
    Legendre, Guillaume
    Madzou, Sebastien
    Descamps, Philippe
    Corroenne, Romain
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 51 (06)
  • [36] Vacuum delivery with episiotomy versus perineal laceration
    Pohl, K.
    Bleicher, A.
    Nobis, V
    Tsvilina, A.
    Drinovac, V
    Jundt, K.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2007, 67 (05) : 543 - 543
  • [37] Risk of repetition of a severe perineal laceration
    Peleg, D
    Kennedy, CM
    Merrill, D
    Zlatnik, FJ
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (06): : 1021 - 1024
  • [38] Delivery Planning After a Third-or Fourth-Degree Perineal Laceration
    Worstell, Teresa
    Nardos, Rahel
    Gregory, W. Thomas
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 83S - 83S
  • [39] RISK FACTORS FOR POOR WOUND HEALING AFTER EPISIOTOMY AND PERINEAL LACERATION: RESULTS FROM THE PIANO REGISTRY
    Lewin, Sara M.
    Martin, Christopher
    Scherl, Ellen
    Stein, Daniel J.
    Ganguly, Eric K.
    Mahadevan, Uma
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S45 - S45
  • [40] Risk factors for perineal trauma in the primiparous population during non-operative vaginal delivery
    D'Souza, Joanna C.
    Monga, Ash
    Tincello, Douglas G.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (03) : 621 - 625