Risk factors for the breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal delivery

被引:44
|
作者
Williams, Meredith K. [1 ]
Chames, Mark C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
perineal laceration; mediolateral episiotomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.085
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors that are associated with the breakdown of perineal laceration repair in the postpartum period. Study design: We conducted a retrospective, case-control study to review perineal laceration repair breakdown in patients who were delivered between September 1995 and February 2005 at the University of Michigan. Bivariate analysis with chi-square test and t-test and stepwise logistic regression analysis were performed. Results: Fifty-nine cases and 118 control deliveries were identified from a total of 14,124 vaginal deliveries. Risk factors were longer second stage of labor (142 vs 87 minutes; P =.001), operative vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-7.3), mediolateral episiotomy (odds ratio, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.6-18.7), third- or fourth-degree laceration (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.4), and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% CL 1.1-7.9). Previous vaginal delivery was protective (odds ratio, 0.38; 95 % CI, 0.18-0.84). Logistic regression showed the most significant factor to be an interaction between operative vaginal delivery and mediolateral episiotomy (odd ratio, 6.36; 95% Cl, 2.18-18.57). Conclusion: The most significant events were mediolateral episiotomy, especially in conjunction with operative vaginal delivery, third- and fourth-degree lacerations, and meconium. (c) 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 759
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors for breakdown of perineal laceration repair following vaginal delivery
    Williams, M
    Chames, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : S48 - S48
  • [2] Risk factors associated with breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal birth
    Cui, Long
    Zhang, Huizhu
    Li, Lun
    Wang, Chi Chiu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (05) : 1543 - 1546
  • [3] Breakdown of Perineal Laceration Repair After Vaginal Delivery: A Case-Control Study
    Jallad, Karl
    Steele, Sarah E.
    Barber, Matthew D.
    [J]. FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 22 (04): : 276 - 279
  • [4] Incidence and risk factors for severe perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients
    Nakai A.
    Yoshida A.
    Yamaguchi S.
    Kawabata I.
    Hayashi M.
    Yokota A.
    Isozaki T.
    Takeshita T.
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2006, 274 (4) : 222 - 226
  • [5] Risk Factors for Severe Perineal Laceration in Spontaneous Vaginal Deliveries
    Pratts, Meghan E.
    Khafagy, Ayatallah M.
    Burke, Anne E.
    Murphy, Jamie D.
    Argani, Cynthia H.
    Werner, Erika F.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 20 (S3) : 197A - 197A
  • [6] Risk Factors for Poor Perineal Outcome after Operative Vaginal Delivery
    Wilkie, Gianna L.
    Saadeh, Michael
    Robinson, Julian
    Little, Sarah
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 96S - 96S
  • [7] Risk factors for poor perineal outcome after operative vaginal delivery
    Gianna L. Wilkie
    Michael Saadeh
    Julian N. Robinson
    Sarah E. Little
    [J]. Journal of Perinatology, 2018, 38 : 1625 - 1630
  • [8] Risk factors for poor perineal outcome after operative vaginal delivery
    Wilkie, Gianna L.
    Saadeh, Michael
    Robinson, Julian N.
    Little, Sarah E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 38 (12) : 1625 - 1630
  • [9] PERINEAL BREAKDOWN AFTER VAGINAL DELIVERY: WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
    DeAndrade, S.
    Hudson, P. L.
    James, K.
    Berkowitz, L. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S275 - S275
  • [10] Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy are the major risk factors for severe perineal laceration: A valid assertion.
    Kudish, B
    Blackwell, S
    McNeeley, SG
    Bujold, E
    Kruger, M
    Hendrix, S
    Sokol, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR GYNECOLOGIC INVESTIGATION, 2006, 13 (02) : 118A - 118A