Risk factors for the breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal delivery

被引:46
|
作者
Williams, Meredith K. [1 ]
Chames, Mark C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
perineal laceration; mediolateral episiotomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.085
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors that are associated with the breakdown of perineal laceration repair in the postpartum period. Study design: We conducted a retrospective, case-control study to review perineal laceration repair breakdown in patients who were delivered between September 1995 and February 2005 at the University of Michigan. Bivariate analysis with chi-square test and t-test and stepwise logistic regression analysis were performed. Results: Fifty-nine cases and 118 control deliveries were identified from a total of 14,124 vaginal deliveries. Risk factors were longer second stage of labor (142 vs 87 minutes; P =.001), operative vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-7.3), mediolateral episiotomy (odds ratio, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.6-18.7), third- or fourth-degree laceration (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.4), and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% CL 1.1-7.9). Previous vaginal delivery was protective (odds ratio, 0.38; 95 % CI, 0.18-0.84). Logistic regression showed the most significant factor to be an interaction between operative vaginal delivery and mediolateral episiotomy (odd ratio, 6.36; 95% Cl, 2.18-18.57). Conclusion: The most significant events were mediolateral episiotomy, especially in conjunction with operative vaginal delivery, third- and fourth-degree lacerations, and meconium. (c) 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 759
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors for breakdown of perineal laceration repair following vaginal delivery
    Williams, M
    Chames, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : S48 - S48
  • [2] Risk factors associated with breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal birth
    Cui, Long
    Zhang, Huizhu
    Li, Lun
    Wang, Chi Chiu
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (05) : 1543 - 1546
  • [3] Breakdown of Perineal Laceration Repair After Vaginal Delivery: A Case-Control Study
    Jallad, Karl
    Steele, Sarah E.
    Barber, Matthew D.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 22 (04): : 276 - 279
  • [4] Incidence and risk factors for severe perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients
    Nakai A.
    Yoshida A.
    Yamaguchi S.
    Kawabata I.
    Hayashi M.
    Yokota A.
    Isozaki T.
    Takeshita T.
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2006, 274 (4) : 222 - 226
  • [5] Risk Factors for Severe Perineal Laceration in Spontaneous Vaginal Deliveries
    Pratts, Meghan E.
    Khafagy, Ayatallah M.
    Burke, Anne E.
    Murphy, Jamie D.
    Argani, Cynthia H.
    Werner, Erika F.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 20 (S3) : 197A - 197A
  • [6] Risk Factors for Poor Perineal Outcome after Operative Vaginal Delivery
    Wilkie, Gianna L.
    Saadeh, Michael
    Robinson, Julian
    Little, Sarah
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 96S - 96S
  • [7] Risk factors for poor perineal outcome after operative vaginal delivery
    Gianna L. Wilkie
    Michael Saadeh
    Julian N. Robinson
    Sarah E. Little
    Journal of Perinatology, 2018, 38 : 1625 - 1630
  • [8] Risk factors for poor perineal outcome after operative vaginal delivery
    Wilkie, Gianna L.
    Saadeh, Michael
    Robinson, Julian N.
    Little, Sarah E.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 38 (12) : 1625 - 1630
  • [9] PERINEAL BREAKDOWN AFTER VAGINAL DELIVERY: WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
    DeAndrade, S.
    Hudson, P. L.
    James, K.
    Berkowitz, L. R.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S275 - S275
  • [10] Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy are the major risk factors for severe perineal laceration: A valid assertion.
    Kudish, B
    Blackwell, S
    McNeeley, SG
    Bujold, E
    Kruger, M
    Hendrix, S
    Sokol, R
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR GYNECOLOGIC INVESTIGATION, 2006, 13 (02) : 118A - 118A