Governance of Relationship Risks in Megaprojects: A Social Network Analysis

被引:15
|
作者
Xie, Linlin [1 ]
Han, Ting [1 ]
Skitmore, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; PROJECTS; POWER;
D O I
10.1155/2019/1426139
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Megaprojects usually involve an alarmingly large number of stakeholders that form a complicated social network and lead to significant relationship risks to client/owners. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out megaproject risk management from a sociological point of view. Based on a case study of the Zhuhai Port, which connects Hong Kong, Zhuhai, and Macao, this paper analyzes the relationship risk between stakeholders and corresponding risk management strategies using social network analysis (SNA). The findings show that stakeholders with a lower density and higher centrality in the network have comparatively a lower relationship risk. Different stakeholders should choose appropriate partners to improve their centrality, reduce the network density to increase their ability to access resources, and enhance their influence and independence in the network. For megaproject client/owners, identifying and monitoring key stakeholders is the key to effective relationship risk governance. The findings provide a number of practical implications for relationship risk management and further demonstrate the importance of stakeholder teamwork, particularly for megaprojects.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Social capital and governance: a social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in Central Finland
    Borg, Riikka
    Toikka, Arho
    Primmer, Eeva
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 50 : 90 - 97
  • [22] Social Co-Governance for Food Safety Risks
    Wu, Linhai
    Liu, Pingping
    Lv, Yuxin
    Chen, Xiujuan
    Tsai, Fu-Sheng
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (11)
  • [23] Economic, social and institutional conditions of network governance Network governance in East Asia
    Yoon, Woojin
    Hyun, Eunjung
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2010, 48 (7-8) : 1212 - 1229
  • [24] Meteorological satellite stakeholder relationship network based on social network analysis
    LI Lu
    LIU Yupeng
    HE Kongxin
    [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32 (04) : 907 - 926
  • [25] Meteorological satellite stakeholder relationship network based on social network analysis
    Li Lu
    Liu Yupeng
    He Kongxin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS, 2021, 32 (04) : 907 - 926
  • [26] A Model to Support OI Collaborative Risks Applying Social Network Analysis
    Nunes, Marco
    Abreu, Antonio
    [J]. BOOSTING COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS 4.0: 21ST IFIP WG 5.5 WORKING CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL ENTERPRISES, PRO-VE 2020, 2021, 598 : 324 - 335
  • [28] Taming wickedness: industrial megaprojects and local governance strategies
    Bjorgo, Frode
    Roiseland, Asbjorn
    [J]. URBAN RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2018, 11 (01) : 37 - 52
  • [29] Understanding the governance of sustainability pathways: hydraulic megaprojects, social–ecological traps, and power in networks of action situations
    Pablo F. Méndez
    Floriane Clement
    Guillermo Palau-Salvador
    Ricardo Diaz-Delgado
    Sergio Villamayor-Tomas
    [J]. Sustainability Science, 2023, 18 : 303 - 321
  • [30] 'Filling the mattress': Trust development in the governance of infrastructure megaprojects
    Ruijter, Hans
    van Marrewijk, Alfons
    Veenswijk, Marcel
    Merkus, Sander
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2021, 39 (04) : 351 - 364