Comparison of anterior and posterior vertebral column resection versus anterior release with posterior internal distraction for severe and rigid scoliosis

被引:17
|
作者
Ren, Chunpeng [1 ]
Liu, Limin [1 ]
Song, Yueming [1 ]
Zhou, Chunguang [1 ]
Liu, Hao [1 ]
Li, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
Severe and rigid scoliosis; Vertebral column resection; Anterior release; Internal distraction; SEVERE SPINAL DEFORMITIES; HALO-GRAVITY TRACTION; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INSTRUMENTATION; OSTEOTOMY; EFFICACY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-014-3270-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to compare efficacy, safety, and cost between staged vertebral column resection (VCR) and anterior release with internal distraction in treating severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis. We examined the records of 43 patients with severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis treated in our hospital. Group A included 26 patients who underwent anterior VCR followed by posterior vertebral column resection and instrumentation from July 2007 to October 2009. Group B included 17 patients who underwent anterior release with temporary posterior internal distraction, followed by posterior fusion and instrumentation from November 2009 to June 2011. The average preoperative main curve for group A was 101.3A degrees (range 90A degrees-130A degrees) and for group B was 104.8A degrees (range 90A degrees-136A degrees). Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. A t test demonstrated that the differences between the groups in preoperative and postoperative coronal and sagittal imbalance, thoracic kyphosis correction, and lumbar lordosis were not statistically significant. Patients in group B showed better postoperative (P = 0.031) and final (P = 0.030) main thoracic curve correction (76.8 and 75.6 %, respectively) than patients in group A (68.3 and 67.7 %, respectively). Patients in group B had better thoracolumbar or lumbar curve correction (85.8 %) than those in group A (76.8 %; P = 0.048). The differences in blood loss and operation time were not statistically significant (P = 0.094 and P = 0.060, respectively). Hospital stay was longer (P = 0.001) and patient cost was higher (P < 0.001) for patients in group B. One patient in group A required ventilator support for 12 h after anterior surgery. One transient dyspnea occurred in group B. No neurologic deficits occurred in either group. Anterior release with posterior internal distraction produces better corrective effects than anterior and posterior VCR, though hospital stay and costs are greater.
引用
收藏
页码:1237 / 1243
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Two Surgical Methods for Treatment of Idiopathic Thoracic Scoliosis - Anterior versus Posterior Approaches
    Chaloupka, R.
    Repko, M.
    Tichy, V.
    Leznar, M.
    Krbec, M.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2012, 79 (05) : 422 - 428
  • [42] Surgical strategy of one stage surgery of anterior release combined with posterior correction in treatment of severe scoliosis
    李明
    刘洋
    朱晓东
    赵新刚
    白玉树
    倪春鸿
    石志才
    侯铁胜
    Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA, 2005, (01) : 43 - 48
  • [43] The impact of posterior temporary internal distraction on stepwise corrective surgery for extremely severe and rigid scoliosis greater than 130°
    Hui-Min Hu
    Hua Hui
    Hai-Ping Zhang
    Da-Geng Huang
    Zhong-Kai Liu
    Yuan-Ting Zhao
    Si-Min He
    Xue-Fang Zhang
    Bao-Rong He
    Ding-Jun Hao
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 557 - 568
  • [44] ONE-STAGE ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR HEMIVERTEBRAL RESECTION AND ARTHRODESIS FOR CONGENITAL SCOLIOSIS
    BRADFORD, DS
    BOACHIEADJEI, O
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 72A (04): : 536 - 540
  • [45] Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe and Rigid Spinal Deformity Associated With Neurological Deficit After Implant Removal Following Posterior Instrumented Fusion
    Tao, Youping
    Wu, Jigong
    Ma, Huasong
    Zhang, Lele
    Shao, Shuilin
    Si, Zebing
    Gao, Bo
    Ji, Yong
    Li, Haixia
    Tao, Feifei
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (13) : E794 - E798
  • [46] Anterior Versus Posterior Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis
    Si, Meng
    Yang, Zhi-ping
    Li, Zhen-feng
    Yang, Qiang
    Li, Jian-min
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 36 (06) : 831 - 836
  • [47] Anterior scoliosis surgery. State of the art and a comparison with posterior techniques
    Halm, H.
    Richter, A.
    Thomsen, B.
    Koeszegvary, M.
    Ahrens, M.
    Quante, M.
    ORTHOPADE, 2009, 38 (02): : 131 - +
  • [48] Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis
    Betz, RR
    Harms, J
    Clements, DH
    Lenke, LG
    Lowe, TG
    Shufflebarger, HL
    Jeszensky, D
    Beele, B
    SPINE, 1999, 24 (03) : 225 - 239
  • [49] Posterior Spinal Fusion Versus Anterior/Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Decision Analysis
    Davis, Matthew A.
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (21) : 2318 - 2323
  • [50] Posterior Multilevel Vertebral Osteotomy for Correction of Severe and Rigid Neuromuscular Scoliosis A Preliminary Study
    Suh, Seung Woo
    Modi, Hitesh N.
    Yang, JaeHyuk
    Song, Hae-Ryong
    Jang, Ki-Mo
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (12) : 1315 - 1320